One can learn, Maggie and one can draw adult, sensible conclusions from the evidence presented. Are you going to refuse jury duty because you are "educated" enough?
1. No steel framed high rise towers have ever collapses due to fires in all their history. Three did so on 911. The odds of that happening are 500 trillion to one. Office fires burning full tilt cannot compromise steel enough to cause a collapse, even with jet fuel added.
The combination of office furnishings and jet fuel burning as it did in WTCs 1 & 2, can burn for your and your kids' lifetimes and never melt steel [2,750F] or molybdenum [4,700F] or vaporize lead [3,180F] OR create the by products of a nanothermite reaction. For the last one, ONLY the US government/US military have access to this NON-COMMERCIALLY available supper explosive invented by US military labs in the 1990s.
How did this nanothermite get into the WTC twin towers and especially into WTC7?
You should be able to draw some adult, sensible conclusions from this evidence presented, or at the least, want to ask more questions, wonder about these impossible anomalies.
But that is exactly what should have happened with all three towers, they should have toppled,
fell in a haphazard halting manner according to the laws of physics. They all fell in a very symmetrical fashion, thru the path of greatest resistance, Maggie. The path of greatest resistance means all the numerous stories below that were stone cold steel which got progressively larger as you went down. They did so without any jolt, which also defies the laws of physics.
The French uses a method called verinage, which uses the weight of the top to help bring down the entire building. Half or more than half of a building's top floors is collapsed by hydraulics which causes the lower half to collapse. BUT, the crucial thing to remember in this is that there is ALWAYS A JOLT, which means there is ALWAYS a slowing down of the rate of descent in accordance with the laws of physics.
That did not happen to the twin towers. They accelerated throughout the collapse - a total impossibility according to the very laws of physics that the entire world acknowledges and believes in.
WTC7 fell at free fall speed. Again, that is an impossibility according to the same laws of physics.
You most assuredly may ask, assert, state anything you damn well please, Maggie.
Isn't that what we are supposed to be about? Why do you sit silent when others try to cow people into silence, when they shout them down, when they ridicule their offerings/evidence/beliefs/assertions/inquiries/... ?
I question your engineer's ideas. Just consider one thing. If what she said had any validity, 1. why did she feel the need to draw you aside and "inform" you in secret.
2. If what she said had any validity then there would never be any need for controlled demolition companies.
3. If what she said had any validity, by what method would the steel "twist and then fall straight down on itself"! Steel that is designed to carry the dead and live loads cannot also be designed to "twist".
[PART B TO FOLLOW]