- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Bush was only President one year? Who knew?
I'm still waiting for a someone to explain to me how increasing barriers, including ( but not limited to) increasing taxes and regulations, on the ability of people to produce goods is going to lead to economic prosperity for all.
That seems to be what those that want to demonize Bush believe while ignoring the economic results up to 2008. I will take the Bush average over the Obama average in every category.
regarding getting Bin Laden, congratulations
now tell me how that puts 24 million unemployed/under employed Americans back to work and reduces the national debt?
As for the "Arab Spring" doesn't look like that one is turning out so well or don't you get the news out of the Middle East?
Really? Color me stunned.
I'm sure he appreciate it very much.
Don't look now, but the economic indicators are continuing to rise. Must suck to know it's going to be 4 more years. But you are right, cleaning up Dubya's mess has been a huge chore.
Well of course whatever happens over there is his doing.
no, it didn't help... too long on political rhetoric and too short on specifics.I'm happy to explain it to you. The president has not proposed increasing barriers, he has proposed targeted tax cuts for those that produce US jobs and eliminating tax breaks for those that only receive them because they are rich. Health and environmental regulations prevent the pollution and health damage that cost our economy more in the the long run.
We've had far too much short-sighted in actions in the past. We don't have the luxury today to keep making the same mistakes. Why would any sane person wish to repeat the a same deregulation and supply side economics of the last decade that almost brought us to another Great Depression???
Hope that helps!
Hardly as amazed as those on the left are at the sheep who drink at the Fox well.I continue to be amazed at how naive, gullible, and misinformed Obama supporters are. .
Hardly as amazed as those on the left are at the sheep who drink at the Fox well.
Meanwhile...4 more years..
Let's see, in four more years the debt will be almost 20 trillion dollars with more and more people dependent on the govt. You continue to buy what you are told but ignore the facts.
Says a lot about you.
What is it about liberalism that creates this kind of loyalty especially from someone who claims to be older than you appear?
Your version of facts are known in the dictionary as spin. But thanks for playing. Meanwhile the economy continues to improve. a deathknell to the right. Must suck to see that. I mean, after all, righties love a bad economy.
Being a fox follower says even more about you. Are you able to form your own opinions/ Check that. it's rhetorical.
With a collar like conservative, that's rich.
you both are a dishonor to your respective parties...
no, it didn't help... too long on political rhetoric and too short on specifics.
by the way, if supply side economics is such an abject failure, why does Obama engage in supply side tax policies?.. and furthermore, why aren't you outraged at him doing so?
Perhaps you should read up on current events.
You mean why did he give into the GOP holding unemployment benefits hostage? To protect the hostages.
ugh.. I remember you now.
thanks, but no thanks, I don't want to discuss anything with you.
Perhaps you should read up on current events.
You mean why did he give into the GOP holding unemployment benefits hostage? To protect the hostages.
Than stop making unsubstantiated claims.
How supply side economics wrecked America:
Progressive Eruptions: HOW REAGAN AND SUPPLY SIDE ECONOMICS WRECKED AMERICA'
David Stockman on GPS today stated that the GOP candidates plans to cut taxes and increase military spending will increase the deficit.
The Trickle Up Theory works quite well. Just ask any republican.
How is that Obama economy working out for you now that debt to GDP is 100%, what supply side Republican had Debt 100% of GDP? You certainly have a distorted view of reality.
Federal Debt - 1940-2015 (As a Percentage of the GDP) - Federal Budget Charts - National Priorities Project
How is that Obama economy working out for you now that debt to GDP is 100%, what supply side Republican had Debt 100% of GDP? You certainly have a distorted view of reality.
Federal Debt - 1940-2015 (As a Percentage of the GDP) - Federal Budget Charts - National Priorities Project
Two bush wars and the Greatest Recession since the Great Depression was the cause. Thankfully we are slowly pulling out of those and the President has call for cuts to our most wasteful spending and increasing revenues.
The GOP only offers more of the supply side economics of the last decade that drove us into the ditch to begin with.
Idiotic entitlements and the government violating the tenth amendment is what causes the problems
The "Obama economy" is still supply-side economics. Economic policy is not substantially different from what it was 5 years ago. It's not about Democrat/Republican.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?