- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
- Messages
- 8,755
- Reaction score
- 1,565
- Location
- Bremerton, Washington
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Conversely, the people who will condemn him for this weren’t going to vote for him anyway.I can understand that.
I'm not so sure it will "help him with some" though because the only people who would approve of what Lindsey Graham has become as of late would have voted for him anyways so, no help is even needed there.
But, the thing is, those who would respect him for standing their ground for them and their conservative ideas, are on the wrong side of history at this point in time. Meaning, most of America is against what most of what modern day "conservatism" stands for. Due to that societal change, and the associated growth in numbers that has put the majority at odds with the modern day conservatives, it is just a matter of time, even in the most remote areas of America, until this new version of conservatism just fizzles out.
The writing is on the wall from sea to shining sea. The regions of our nation, republican strong used to easily winning elections, the percentage gap is slipping. I'm not sure if we are quite there yet in Kentucky. But it's going to be close. Just 5 years ago, it probably wouldn't have been close at all. The flip-flop republicans who have hitched their wagons to the Trump train, I suspect, will sink right alongside of the USS Trumptanic in due time. Trump has a long history of drowning people in his destructive wake. Perhaps, this time, it might be viewed as poetic justice.
Seriously? Do you hold everyone to that who has changed positions on their previous stanceI cannot recall a US politician, much less a sitting Senator, debase him/herself as badly as Graham has done!
Seriously? Do you hold everyone to that who has changed positions on their previous stance
You are right; It is entirely up to the South Carolina electorate and those who live there know best what to think of the hypocrite.It will point out the nonsense you just posted...You aren't in South Carolina, like I am....and you do not know the electorate here or what we are tired of.
You’re not serious are you? They all have.Can you cite another politician who has begged for money on national television? I’ll wait........
You’re not serious are you? They all have.
Oh but you would pee your pants because that would mean 200 million people in the streets.You mean rioting. Protesters dont terrorize people. Secondly...we would not pee our pants. Picture 1 million Rittenhouses who decide they have had enough. Molon Labe.
I hear Hollywood is pouring money into Graham's opponent's campaign. Something they often do. Remember Beto? And what about Abrams who still thinks she is governor of Georgia. Hollywood poured millions into their campaigns and it didn't help.
Masks has fallen from many on the R side.it’s frightening to see people like him throw away so called principles for power. He is a huge liar and hypocrite. Why should be trusted?
From what is seen from polls, he is in a tight race, and his losing would be part of the icing on the cake
I hear Hollywood is pouring money into Graham's opponent's campaign. Something they often do. Remember Beto? And what about Abrams who still thinks she is governor of Georgia. Hollywood poured millions into their campaigns and it didn't help.
Yes it was much less...it was hanging chads. This is hanging chads on a nationwide scale. You guys must know the votes cant be counted right?
Sick peoole
people can always request a mail in. We are talking unsolicited...unsolicited...unsolicited unsolicited...
The hanging chad is relevant because it showed how one county help up the election. Now we have this scenario on a nationwide scale. In your logic process thats ok? I openly laugh at that process.You know for a fact hanging chads (which of course don't exist anymore) have absolutely no relevance to mail-in ballots. So there is no reason to bring up that election debacle in a discussion about absentee voting.
I will keep asking you this until you answer me: Why is mail-in voting unfair to voters who are at risk of getting COVID-19 if they do not stay home or are physically unable to vote any other way?
hahahaha....watch the rittenhouse video.Oh but you would pee your pants because that would mean 200 million people in the streets.
the one where the kid murders three people and is now facing murder charges, because he was pointing his gun and threatening protesters? That video? Yeah, go try it and we will all watch you on television while you are given the death penalty...or reading about you in the news, because a good guy with a gun shot back.hahahaha....watch the rittenhouse video.
Protesters dont chase people and throw things at them. Rioters do. Get your use of words fixed. Do you cede they were rioters ot do I need to iggy due to facebook level fact denial?the one where the kid murders three people and is now facing murder charges, because he was pointing his gun and threatening protesters? That video? Yeah, go try it and we will all watch you on television while you are given the death penalty...or reading about you in the news, because a good guy with a gun shot back.
No one is mailing ballots. People are being mailed forms to request ballots.The hanging chad is relevant because it showed how one county help up the election. Now we have this scenario on a nationwide scale. In your logic process thats ok? I openly laugh at that process.
On your question, it is not unfair as those people can request and vote absantee same as always. The question is why are you mailing ballots to people who didn't request them?
AbsenteeThe hanging chad is relevant because it showed how one county help up the election. Now we have this scenario on a nationwide scale. In your logic process thats ok? I openly laugh at that process.
On your question, it is not unfair as those people can request and vote absantee same as always. The question is why are you mailing ballots to people who didn't request them?
IronyProtesters dont chase people and throw things at them. Rioters do. Get your use of words fixed. Do you cede they were rioters ot do I need to iggy due to facebook level fact denial?
The problem with your theory is that no sane person believes Trump will come close to losing SC. So the problem is he’s not Trump enough.Graham used to be one of those Republicans I could respect despite being on the other side of the fence.
Watching him become a Trump snycophant these past few years has been downright disgusting.
And how would that end if even a portion of the protestors were carrying an AR? FYI, people were following him because he just shot someone.hahahaha....watch the rittenhouse video.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?