- Joined
- Jan 5, 2016
- Messages
- 6,917
- Reaction score
- 2,930
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
No, it's just a literal interpretation of the words forming the term CT.
Consider President Bush's comments in that regard at the UN in late 2001 with his hallmark dyslexia: "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty." Attaboy George! :lol:
And Comey was one of the other most respected men in public life until the 2016 Presidential campaign where liberals were for him, then against him, then for him....just depended on what he had to say.
Here is a little more perspective on Mueller's "qualifications" and history.
He has been a yes man for the deep state players for quite some time. https://digwithin.net/2018/04/08/muellers-history/
And Comey was one of the other most respected men in public life until the 2016 Presidential campaign where liberals were for him, then against him, then for him....just depended on what he had to say.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...k-of-wolves-and-an-illegitimate-investigationHighly partisan investigators?
Please link that, with a credible link. And define what it means.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...k-of-wolves-and-an-illegitimate-investigation
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
And Comey was one of the other most respected men in public life until the 2016 Presidential campaign where liberals were for him, then against him, then for him....just depended on what he had to say.
Color me surprised if she dont. I already know she is just trying to troll me. She is asking a stupid question that she already knows the answer too. I'm sure she thinks she has some clever rebuttal.He (they) won't bother to even read it...
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...k-of-wolves-and-an-illegitimate-investigation
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
So you're Ned Ryun, Opinion writer for The Hill? How are things at the highly conservative American Majority that you founded?
SOP-DP LEFT "Dodge the FACTS..Attack the Source" Allinsky bull****. It's still 1998 for the DP left, apparently.
Does he not meet your approval list?So you're Ned Ryun, Opinion writer for The Hill? How are things at the highly conservative American Majority that you founded?
It's just as much fun for us, watching the mental contortions you all twist yourselves into trying to deflect away from the cold hard facts that interrupt your naratives.It's fun to watch you and other Twump sycophants tremble in fear of what's going to happen to Donnie when the hammer falls.
It's just as much fun for us, watching the mental contortions you all twist yourselves into trying to deflect away from the cold hard facts that interrupt your naratives.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Here is a little more perspective on Mueller's "qualifications" and history.
He has been a yes man for the deep state players for quite some time. https://digwithin.net/2018/04/08/muellers-history/
As TIME magazine reported, the likely explanation for the bombing, supported by independent intelligence experts, was that U.S. operatives “targeted Flight 103 in order to kill the hostage-rescue team.” This would prevent disclosure of what McKee’s team had learned.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...k-of-wolves-and-an-illegitimate-investigation
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Does he not meet your approval list?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
He blew any chance of being viewed as impartial as soon as he assembled a team of highly partisan investigators and it only gets worse from there.
Its been clear from the start that his mission isnt about the russians tampering with the election. Its to get Trump.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jeffrey-toobin-mueller-memo_us_5c07798be4b0a6e4ebd9b0df
Mueller was one of the most respected men in public life until his appointment as Special Prosecutor whereupon Trumpians promptly discovered he’d been misjudged. The time is here or almost here for the reckoning.
Act like you knew who Mueller was and liked him before he was named Special Prosecutor.
Correct, but so what if I didn’t.
No, I don't pay attention to partisans. I assume if one of the liberals here posted some uber partisan liberal's opinion piece (which is what you posted - an opinion piece), you'd agree with the liberal's opinion. Of course, right?
That article is an opinion piece about people who have either since been fired, or who had some incidental contact with democrats, or who investigated a supposedly discredited dossier that had nothing to do with the investigation. There is no evidence of a tainted investigation in that article, but there are a lot of vague questions and loose suggestions of conflicts of interest that a conspiracy theorist could cling to in order to imply that evidence exists.
It bears mentioning that all of the names mentioned in that article as having conflicts of interest have qualifications that make them absolutely ideal to serve on an investigation into money laundering and organized crime. Research them yourself and ask yourself if you wouldn't pick all of them to investigate election tampering and collusion with a foreign power.
If you didn't that plays to the point you were making about Mueller's respect before he became Special Counsel. Most people didn't know who he was, and they decided whether to like him or not along partisan lines.
The irony of you two complaining about a partisan source is delicious.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?