Of course Obama wasn't going to allow Hasan to be tried for a terrorist attack. It was liberal political correctness that allowed the attack to happen. And also, Barack Obama suffers from "Narcissistic Personality Disorder" (NPD. In layman terms, Obama is a narcissist, that's why instead of admitting that it was a terrorist attack that happened on his watch he claimed it was nothing more than violance in the work place.
But every soldier who was on Fort Hood that day knew it was a terrorist attack. Most Americans know it was a terrorist attack. Even Obama knows it was a terrorist attack. And if Obama wasn't a narcissist, he would have came out on day one and announced it to the American People that it was a terrorist attack. But Obama is an incompetent Cn'C who has no cajones. Just ask Vladimir Putin.
There are exceptions of those who don't believe it was a terrorist attack, those who drink the kool-aid.
Oh please. Bush still gets more hate than Obama, let alone during his presidency.
but but but.. that's different!
as an aside...who are our REAL enemies?
Oh please. Bush still gets more hate than Obama, let alone during his presidency.
When you consider every single issue, we'll have to agree to disagree. Bush's finest move since leaving the POTUS is behaving like a Statesman and listening to the advice of his Father. I did not join a different blog until May of 2010, after I retired, so I didn't see the hatred as now with the internet.
Oh I see. Obama personally demanded that Hasan not be charged with terrorism just like how he personally oversaw everything bad that's happened in America ever. Now that I see you're one of those types and know I can stop talking to you.
I like your Vegas location. His Dems are split 50-50. I see it connected to the Amash amendment and the NSA. The Nation is war-weary. I believe the President is listening. Hence, the call for a Congressional vote. Therefore, he's not going down alone on this one.
Do you know why Osama bin Laden decided to attack America on it's own soil and thinking they could get away with it ?
Now if you were underage in 1993 or didn't read the newspapers or were just uninformed, maybe you can be given a pass.
Osma bin Laden explained why he was going to attack America on it's own soil. It had to do not with President Clinton's actions but inactions. Bin Laden looked upon Clinton as being a pantywaist. Bin Laden made the mistake thinking that G.W. Bush was also a pantywaist but Bush was completely the opposite.
I don't like running foreign policy by public opinion.well yeah.. he is listening.... via the NSA:lol:.... but he sure isn't listening to the people about Syria, he doesn't have popular support for bombing Syria.. the opposite is true.
I believe the Amash vote has created a serious schism with defense, with two different coalitions across party lines.it doesn't matter much... we're gonna bomb Syria, despite having little to no support from the people or most of our allies...Congress will vote to bomb, they always do.
I am a betting man on sports, legally, when I'm in Nevada. I would not bet on this. My gut aches for the POTUS, our Congress, the Syrian good guys whoever they are, but especially for our Military Personnel.I think Congress with cover their ass though.... they'll give consent to Obama to bomb, if, and only if, he deems it necessary....they'll put it on him to decide, just like they did for Bush. ( then bitch about his decision later)
Obama may be the most incompetent Commander in Chief of the U.S. military in history but he is still the one who issues the orders.
Yeah, he was elected for a second term by idiots, it's like an idiot with a following of idiots. Amazing what this county have become, a majority of idiots.........
I love it! It truly takes a special kind of mind to be the kind of Islamophobic warmongering Neo-con that supported all of Bush's war plans as long as they were even remotely connected to fighting the terrorists who "hate our freedoms," are homicidal and suicidal maniacs, and are the antitheses of all we hold dear, and yet gives Bin Laden the benefit of the doubt for his stated justification for attacking the US in '93. I guess it would also be fair then to point out that the only reason he hated the US in the first place was because we placed troops in Saudi Arabia during Desert Shield/Storm, but I'm not going to hold that against Bush Sr. Why should American presidents be blamed for the psychotic reactions of a madman to their foreign policies?
Can I assume you were the kind of hysteric conservative that focused all dialogue after the Benghazi attacks on what the State Department/White House/Susan Rice knew and what they were covering up, rather than asking who actually committed the attacks and what we were doing to pursue them??
Yeah, he was elected for a second term by idiots, it's like an idiot with a following of idiots. Amazing what this county have become, a majority of idiots.........
I wouldn't be so quick to lambast Obama as incompetent. Republican nominee got Mitt Romney got trounced by a fairly large margin. His failures, perceived or otherwise, were not enough to get Americans to vote for the opposition. Keep that in mind that no matter how horrible you want to make Obama out to be, he crushed the oppposition. It wasn't close.Actually he was given a second chance by those who were so embarrassed that they voted for an unqualified and incompetent man for President in 2008 and were hoping that Obama would redeem himself after four years of failure.
But there are those who did vote to reelect Obama because they have a monkey on their backs and want more free stuff.
I wouldn't be so quick to lambast Obama as incompetent. .
You must think I'm partisan. I said: "Both presidents done what they could to stop the spread of Al Qaeda" The way you were writing it you had them in one area.You didn't mention the Al Qaeda attack at Fort Hood.
The Al Qaeda attack at the U.S. military recruiting station in Hope Arkansas.
Lets not forget the underwear bomber. Fortuantly even though the Al Qaeda terrorist was able to ignite the fuse, the kicker charge failed to set off the main charge.
All threee can be linked back to Yaman.
We'll give Obama a complete pass on the Boston Marathon terrorist bombings because they may have been Islamist terrorist they didn't have connections to Al Qaeda.
All of these happened on U.S. soil under Obama's watch.
Hasan, the FT. HOOD shooter, was not charged with terrorism and to this day there have not yet been any confirmed links that he was actually linked to Al-Qaeda. That's like saying I spoke to Donald Trump and therefore I'm a member of his business organizations.
Re: the terrorist who shot up the recruiting center...I also stand corrected. He was an actual terrorist with actual connections to al-qaeda. Thank goodness he was an incompetent goon.
The seeting hatred out there is worse in this Nation than it is with our REAL enemies.
You mean our REAL enemies? I'd like an answer to that question as well.
Luckily, BHO has been clear who these enemies are.
WASHINGTON, May 28, 2013 ― “We are going to punish our enemies and we are going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.” ― President Obama
Read more: Obama and the Chicago Way: Intimidate, silence and destroy 'enemies' | Washington Times Communities
So... he thinks average Americans are worse than genocidal dictators. How nice.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...78442/Barack-Obama-on-Syria-text-in-full.htmlIt endangers our friends and our partners along Syria’s borders, including Israel, Jordan, Turkey, Lebanon and Iraq.
You must think I'm partisan. I said: "Both presidents done what they could to stop the spread of Al Qaeda" The way you were writing it you had them in one area.
Well right now he is not going to do an air strike without congressional approval. But what are the costs of ignoring that situation completely? :shrug:
Obama smart. Bush dumb.
It comes down to that.
what are the costs of ignoring that situation completely? :shrug:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?