Why don't you document some of Biden's war crimes for us here.If all war criminals are to be held accountable then Biden will be sitting side by side with Putin in the Hague during their war crimes trials.
Sure thing:Why don't you document some of Biden's war crimes for us here.
By that definition, every American president for the last 100 years is a war criminal and should be incarcerated. The depths you go to in order to defend Putin's actions are astounding.Sure thing:
Afghan killed by drone praised by co-workers in US aid group
The Afghan man who was killed in a U.S. drone strike last month was an enthusiastic longtime employee at an American humanitarian organizationabcnews.go.com Biden droned the wrong guy, innocent aid worker killed in Kabul strike: NYT
A US airstrike in Kabul against a supposed ISIS bomber reportedly killed an innocent man who worked for a US aid group and his family, according to newly published testimony and footage.nypost.com
Lying again as usual. How have I defended Putin? I want them all tried for war crimes, while you defend drone strikes against innocent civilians, so it means you love murder. Congrats on showing your true colors.By that definition, every American president for the last 100 years is a war criminal and should be incarcerated. The depths you go to in order to defend Putin's actions are astounding.
The intentional war crimes being committed by Russia as part of their doctrine is in no way comparable to unintentional deaths from drone strikes.
Sure thing:
Afghan killed by drone praised by co-workers in US aid group
The Afghan man who was killed in a U.S. drone strike last month was an enthusiastic longtime employee at an American humanitarian organizationabcnews.go.com Biden droned the wrong guy, innocent aid worker killed in Kabul strike: NYT
A US airstrike in Kabul against a supposed ISIS bomber reportedly killed an innocent man who worked for a US aid group and his family, according to newly published testimony and footage.nypost.com
You're defending Putin by trying to put him in the same category as the last 20 American presidents. The US does not intentionally target civilians like Russia does as part of their core doctrine.Lying again as usual. How have I defended Putin? I want them all tried for war crimes, while you defend drone strikes against innocent civilians, so it means you love murder. Congrats on showing your true colors.
LOL every drone strike is a deliberate target. You clearly have no idea what youre talking about.These are not deliberate targeting of civilians. You’re trying too hard.
Jesus, your reasons are moronic. So you think drone strikes arent a war crime just because a few people get killed? How many have to die for it to be a war crime in your view?You're defending Putin by trying to put him in the same category as the last 20 American presidents. The US does not intentionally target civilians like Russia does as part of their core doctrine.
It's like saying Roosevelt should be charged as a war criminal because some civilians died by American hands in WW2.
The killing of civilians has to be intentional or intentionally negligent. Russia targets civilians intentionally and on a mass scale as a strategic tactic.LOL every drone strike is a deliberate target. You clearly have no idea what youre talking about.
Jesus, your reasons are moronic. So you think drone strikes arent a war crime just because a few people get killed? How many have to die for it to be a war crime in your view?
You clearly dont know how drone strikes work. I thought you served?The killing of civilians has to be intentional or intentionally negligent. Russia targets civilians intentionally and on a mass scale as a strategic tactic.
Your comparison of that to US tactics is ridiculous and clearly has the goal of attempting to reduce Russia's guilt by pretending we all do the same.
Lol, I don't know how drone strikes work? Every attack is targeted by a drone operator, but none of the US drone operators are intentionally targeting civilians.You clearly dont know how drone strikes work. I thought you served?
Every attack is targeted since an operator manually controls the drone from a remote location.
Now answer the question- how many must be killed in order for you to consider it a war crime?
You're gaslighting. The Afghan strike was a mistake and it was not the only time that's happened. There was absolutely nothing strategic to be gained by deliberately targeting some random Afghan civilians as we were withdrawing. They thought they were targeting a legitimate target. That's happened with drone strikes under all sorts of US administrations, Democrat and Republican- including the Trump administration... actually, ESPECIALLY the Trump administration.LOL every drone strike is a deliberate target. You clearly have no idea what youre talking about.
Why don't you document some of Biden's war crimes for us here.
By that definition, every American president for the last 100 years is a war criminal and should be incarcerated. The depths you go to in order to defend Putin's actions are astounding.
The intentional war crimes being committed by Russia as part of their doctrine is in no way comparable to unintentional deaths from drone strikes.
You're gaslighting. The Afghan strike was a mistake and it was not the only time that's happened. There was absolutely nothing strategic to be gained by deliberately targeting some random Afghan civilians as we were withdrawing. They thought they were targeting a legitimate target. That's happened with drone strikes under all sorts of US administrations, Democrat and Republican- including the Trump administration... actually, ESPECIALLY the Trump administration.
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016
Civilian deaths skyrocketed in Afghanistan under Trump, whose administration relaxed the rules of engagement for airstrikes, a new study shows.www.businessinsider.com
Where was all your outrage back then?
Putin's strikes on civilian targets, on the other hand, ARE very deliberate and strategic- done with the express purpose of destroying the morale of the local population and getting them to submit.
You're trying too hard. It's making you look ridiculous. You may want to go back to looking for Obama's secret birth certificate- because at least you were doing a little better with that.
So all Russia has to say is “we thought there was one Ukrainian soldier in the theater and that’s who we were targeting” and it becomes okay and no longer a war crime?
The motives have to make sense. A drone strike on a civilian target killing a handful of people on your way out makes absolutely no sense other than as a mistake. But repeated targeting of things like kindergartens and maternity wards of hospitals while invading a country, however, does make sense as a tactic to break down the population to submit.
Come on man, I know you know this. You know you know this. It's obvious to everyone you're just trying too hard to troll, and it makes you look silly and desperate.
So it’s okay to kill a bunch of civilians through negligence? Nobody should be prosecuted for them?
The US operators had to know there were children right next to their supposed target. They chose to fire anyways.
By that definition, every American president for the last 100 years is a war criminal and should be incarcerated.
Yes there is a difference. Motivation matters. If a doctor has a complication inadvertently while doing some complicated surgical procedure, at best it might be considered negligence or malpractice- and even there it would have to be proven that some other reasonable or skilled doctor in that position could not have done the same. But if a doctor takes their scalpel and deliberately and repeatedly stabs their patient in the neck- well then that's murder. Big difference.
I understand that Americans don’t want to talk about that, don’t want to remember that, the political establishment wants to move on from that. But there is a moral dimension to the Ukraine war that should cause us to be a little bit humble about pointing fingers at other people.”
Indeed, Biden’s own Ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, had to edit her March 2nd remarks to the General Assembly. She said, “We have seen videos of Russian forces moving exceptionally lethal weaponry into Ukraine, which has no place on the battlefield. That includes cluster munitions and vacuum bombs – which are banned under the Geneva Convention.”
The phrase, “which has no place on the battlefield” was struck from the transcript, reflecting the U.S. refusal to sign the Convention on Cluster Munitions. The U.S. used cluster bombs in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Iraq and as recently as 2009 in Yemen in an attack that killed 55 people.
If international law is to count for anything, it must be enforced equally. No one, in Russia, the United States or elsewhere, is above the law. The United States should join the civilized world and sign the international treaties on the ICC, cluster munitions, and landmines.
Democracy Now!
A daily TV/radio news program, hosted by Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez, pioneering the largest community media collaboration in the U.S.www.democracynow.org
The operators of the drone were motivated to kill a bunch of children because they thought it would be “worth it” if they also killed another guy.
In what world is that not a war crime? How many innocent people is it okay to murder in order to kill a guilty person?
Law enforcement sometimes deals with such scenarios during hostage situations as well. Sometimes they make the wrong call. These are, admittedly, very difficult situations to be sure.
But are you really saying you don't see the difference between such difficult calls and a deliberate and systematic campaign of civilian slaughter for intimidation purposes?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?