• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wanna make some money? Help target SCOTUS judges!

Renae

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
50,241
Reaction score
19,244
Location
San Antonio Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative


Easy money if you spot them, this couldn't lead to terrible things... naw...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ren
Can it be more terrible than forcing a woman to become a mother? Probably not.
Ask the baby who would die if you had your way. Oh that's right, y'all choose to politically ignore the baby, because that makes it easier. Monstrous societies have done that for all of human history, justify the unpersoning of someone for political expedience then convincing themselves they weren't really people.
 
Ask the baby who would die if you had your way. Oh that's right, y'all choose to politically ignore the baby, because that makes it easier. Monstrous societies have done that for all of human history, justify the unpersoning of someone for political expedience then convincing themselves they weren't really people.
Think of a Chicken.
Then, think of an egg.
Has your zeal for your religious tenets clouded your ability to see the difference between the two?
 
Last edited:
Interesting, isn't it?

Never in my lifetime have SCOTUS judges been targeted like this. Makes you wonder, what has changed?

FYI

Trumpism is destroying America from within, just as Putin planned.
These... aren't trumpist.. these domestic terrorist are lefties.
 
1657381854129.webp

Is it just me or is there a high degree of irony...

..... ..... ..... In Doocy asking about SCOTUS Justices having a right to privacy...

..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... When protesters are protesting a SCOTUS decision where the Justices said the right of privacy isn't in the Constitution?

WW
 
This isn’t protesting. It’s stalking.
I'm not saying this is right or that I approve. But, in this World actions have consequences. When SCOTUS took an action that less than half of the population agree with, they should of known there would be consequences to pay.
 
I don’t mind protesting politicians or justices - nor even mind protesting at SCOTUS itself.

I do mind if he was with his family, especially his kids. They have nothing to do with his decision…or his position. And, I feel bad for other patrons in the restaurant that had no party to this.

I felt the same way when BLM protestors were harassing people at restaurants in the summer of 2020.

I feel there is a difference between productive protests and just flat out harassment. This strikes me as harassment.
 
If roles were reversed the OP would probably be trying to convince us that the justices were having sex with toddlers at the pizza parlor or some other heinous shit.

Let us know when things get out of hand, until then just think of it as you still triggering the snowflakes and owning the libs, which is what y'all always wanted, right.
 
View attachment 67400933

Is it just me or is there a high degree of irony...

..... ..... ..... In Doocy asking about SCOTUS Justices having a right to privacy...

..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... When protesters are protesting a SCOTUS decision where the Justices said the right of privacy isn't in the Constitution?

WW

Let's be clear, he was not forced out of a DC restaurant. He simply wanted to avoid the protest outside so like the coward he is. He ran out the back door.
I'll bet the girl he tried to rape wishes she had an easy escape, for an incomparable event.
 
I'm not saying this is right or that I approve. But, in this World actions have consequences. When SCOTUS took an action that less than half of the population agree with, they should of known there would be consequences to pay.
When making decisions Judges aren’t meant to measure public opinion.

As for “consequence,” one either condemns intimidation tactics or one does not. There is no middle ground.
 
I don’t mind protesting politicians or justices - nor even mind protesting at SCOTUS itself.

I do mind if he was with his family, especially his kids. They have nothing to do with his decision…or his position. And, I feel bad for other patrons in the restaurant that had no party to this.

I felt the same way when BLM protestors were harassing people at restaurants in the summer of 2020.

I feel there is a difference between productive protests and just flat out harassment. This strikes me as harassment.

For me the line is simple. Is it a legal protest or not. Who he is with holds no relevance. In fact, that is ridiculous.
 
Back
Top Bottom