• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:914] Do People Have The Right To Be Racists And Bigots?

Do People Have The Right To Be Racists And Bigots?


  • Total voters
    96
I was reading the following article today:


part of which Tulsi Gabbard said, " When you have people like former CIA Director John Brennan openly talking about how he’s spoken with or heard from appointees and nominees in the Biden administration who are already starting to look across our country for these types of movements similar to the insurgencies they’ve seen overseas, that in his words, he says make up this unholy alliance of religious extremists, racists, bigots, he lists a few others and at the end, even libertarians.”

So, it made me wonder, do People Have The Right To Be Racists And Bigots without being profiled by intelligence? Or, do we indiscriminately profile everyone who we deem to be racists or bigots and have an FBI file on all of them?
Mmmm..... ever heard of CIA tool, George Soros? From destroying the English pound, with money from the IMF, and Italy's finances, to the English defence league, to BLM to antifa.
They are the racists, they are the bigots, they are the problem.
The CIA and American military, Working with the terrorist organisations in Iraq, Syyria, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan, the same organisations blamed for the twin towers etc!
And the same terrorist organisation visited by Senator McCain, being one of many!
 
Mmmm..... ever heard of CIA tool, George Soros? From destroying the English pound, with money from the IMF, and Italy's finances, to the English defence league, to BLM to antifa.
They are the racists, they are the bigots, they are the problem.
The CIA and American military, Working with the [B]terrorist organisations in Iraq, Syyria, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan, the same organisations blamed for the twin towers[/B] etc!
And the same terrorist organisation visited by Senator McCain, being one of many!

Al Qaeda was proven the have committed 9/11.
 
Hiring people based off of color alone is racism... you agree undoubtedly.
Words have meanings and it is hard to debate topics when people misunderstand the meanings of words. Racism and discrimination are two different things, you are using the word racism when you appear to mean discrimination.

Hiring someone based off of color is not racism, whether or not it is discriminatory is a bit more debatable but using the modern vernacular, it would not be. The reason you are making the decision matters. If a company wants to expand sales to a particular community they may hire a spokesman or an advertising firm based solely off of race, that is not racism. They don't believe that people of other races are inferior they just believe their purpose is best served by a particular minority. If an administration wants to send a message of inclusion by targeting certain positions as minority led, that is not racism or discrimination as the justification isn't based on inferiority.
 
Words have meanings and it is hard to debate topics when people misunderstand the meanings of words. Racism and discrimination are two different things, you are using the word racism when you appear to mean discrimination.

Hiring someone based off of color is not racism, whether or not it is discriminatory is a bit more debatable but using the modern vernacular, it would not be. The reason you are making the decision matters. If a company wants to expand sales to a particular community they may hire a spokesman or an advertising firm based solely off of race, that is not racism. They don't believe that people of other races are inferior they just believe their purpose is best served by a particular minority. If an administration wants to send a message of inclusion by targeting certain positions as minority led, that is not racism or discrimination as the justification isn't based on inferiority.
I am not misunderstanding the meaning of the words... nice try being condescending thought... and that is a debate fail tactic, BTW.
 


Al Qaeda did 9/11....

That is what the evidence shows.

CT forum that way - - - >
 
Supremacists have a faulty mindset that they are Superior.

The Superiority Mindset leads to the Authority Mindset which allows for The Authoritarian Right to rule over the inferiors.

A domestic group with that faulty mindset of Superiority can be used as a terror threat in the country.

The Superiority Mindset eventually moves into the stage of looking at the inferiors as being subhuman.

Once the subhuman concept is firmly established then the mindset is altered to the taking action stage of bringing the inferiors into subjection by any means.

Terrorizing is the beginning stage of the subjection of the subhuman inferiors. Once submission is accomplished. The next step is the Absolute Power mindset.

Once Absolute Power is established the no holds barred mindset eventually will justify subhuman treatment of the subhuman inferiors.

Color of skin is not the telltale sign of the Supremacist Mindset.

The telltale sign is The Superiors who have the Power to actually achieve Absolute Power over the masses they deem to be inferior and skin color is not a factor...

The factor is those who do not Obey the Superiors are the ones who become the subhuman inferiors.

The Absolute Power Supremacists first tactic is Divide and then Conquer the inferiors using fear and chaos tactics.

domestics of any color do not have the power to achieve Absolute Power they are subhuman inferiors to be used and will be the first to be taken out easily.

imho Roseann

Brava, Roseann
👏
 
Your post is outing you as a Liberal... but that is beside the point. Also, this is not a black and white issue... NFL teams can hire, not hire or fire people. If a person hurts their image/whatever, they are free to not employ the person. Twitter is also not bound to allow anybody to speak about whatever they want, if Twitter feels that said person violates their rules/image. When you post black and white thinking your posts will be easy to decimate.
...But in the next breath :
Hiring people based off of color alone is racism... you agree undoubtedly.

Wow!

But you voted for this? (PR mirage)

Why Many White Men Love Trump’s Coronavirus Response
More than 80 percent of Republicans think the president is doing a great job with the pandemic. Here’s why.
10/29/20

"..Joe Biden doesn’t give these men the same sense of restored pride. They feel the Democratic nominee is a Trojan horse liberal women and minorities are using to advance their own interests. Biden doesn’t present himself as a defender of white men, and they don’t see him that way.

Hochschild sees her new work as an extension of the deep story she began probing in Strangers. In that book, her interview subjects found their guy in Trump. Now her interviewees are coming to realize their hero is surrounded by enemies. He’s battling evil forces such as the liberal media, the impeachment, the Democrats in Congress, and the lawyers who indicted his advisers. But Trump is fighting all of those enemies—the left, the deep state, the pandemic—and he’s fighting them for his constituents.

The final chapter of this story, she said, is Trump becoming an almost Christlike figure to these men. “‘Look how I suffer,’” is how Trump presents himself, Hochschild told me. “‘I am suffering for you.’ And they say, ‘Thank you.’”


DOJ Can't Replace Trump as Defendant in E. Jean Carroll ...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-trump-as-defendant-in-rape-accuser-s-lawsuit
"Oct 27, 2020 Trump Rape Accuser Says Slander Isn't a Presidential Duty. A DOJ team led by Acting Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Bossert Clark invoked the Federal Tort Claims Act ..."

Trump, lawyer plotted to oust acting attorney general ...
https://abc7.com/donald-trump-election-result-2020-jeffrey-clark-georgia/9935061/
"Jeffrey Clark nearly convinced Donald Trump to remove ..acting Attorney General and use the justice department to undo Georgia's election results, .."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-laziness-is-a-trait-in-blacks/
"What's True
Donald Trump once tweeted, "Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won't see another black president for generations!"..

"..KARL:.. But why do you say that means we won’t see another black president for generations?

TRUMP: Because I think that he has set a very poor standard. I think that he has set a very low bar and I think it’s a shame for the African American people.

And by the way, he has done nothing for African Americans. You look at what’s gone on with their income levels. You look at what’s gone on with their youth. I thought that he would be a great cheerleader for this country. I thought he’d do a fabulous job for the African American citizens of this country..."


Barbara Res' Trump Book Describes Racist, Sexist Comments
https://www.mediaite.com/donald-tru...ut-germans-putting-jewish-employees-in-ovens/
"from Barbara Res, who spent 18 years as a top executive with Trump's real estate development company, .."
 
Last edited:
The system is rigged for favored applicants? Roseann🙂

Yes, and many who took advantage of that pretend to care about one minority over another when in fact they really don't care just like pooping in the punch bowl because no matter what they and theirs are going to the front of the line... ✌
 
Biden is excluding white people from being considered for posts in his cabinet???

He vowed to do so for the #1 spot, Vice President. Promising a woman of color. Imagine a Presidential candidate promising a man absent of color.
 
If you are going to rely upon BS fabrications to try and make your point, you should probably strive for something relevant instead.

Did Trump and his supporters demand he be fired or not? If yes, how is that not trying to cancel him?
 
Yes, and many who took advantage of that pretend to care about one minority over another when in fact they really don't care just like pooping in the punch bowl because no matter what they and theirs are going to the front of the line... ✌
The many did not set the past or current application rules that Colleges used to determine acceptance of the applicants.

There is only one way to secure equality for all applicants...

There should be no questions concerning race, gender, name, parentage, politics or any other personal information about the applicants.

Colleges should simply use all of the applicants academic records via all of the learning institutions they attended.

Note: To ensure complete equality for all applicants...The names, locations or any information that identifies the institutions attended should be redacted.

imho Roseann:)
 
I am not misunderstanding the meaning of the words... nice try being condescending thought... and that is a debate fail tactic, BTW.
Well then, if you are not misunderstanding the words, you are knowingly wrong and fabricating a position. I apologize, I shouldn't have assumed it was an honest mistake. So you know very well that excluding a person from a job based on skin color is not sufficient to level a charge of racism. I don't really understand why we are having this discussion then, but trolls gotta troll...
 
Off hand, I would suggest we investigate groups who are a threat to our safety and security no matter what their specific beliefs are. Unfortunately our history of this shows that the authorities have been overzealous in their surveillance and actions against dissident groups, such as anti-war and civil rights groups and have gone easy on right-wing racist and so-called libertarian groups.

They've gone easy on Republican groups that you equate with right-wing racist. But that's because they usually don't riot.
 
Back
Top Bottom