• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:776] Breaking: Special counsel informs Trump he is target in probe of efforts to overturn 2020 election:

This is beyond.

Your claiming bettors can determine an election?

Sorry, I'm not buying it. Not at all. Even pollsters can't get it right.
Bookmakers are superior to Pollsters in determining the possibilities of success of candidates.
A case in point today:

Ramaswamy is in 6th place in yesterdays poll behind Pence, Haley, Christie & Scott who have absolutely no chance

At Predictit - Ramaswamy is only behind Trump & DeSantis. He may not win but he'll be in the race far longer than those previously mentioned
That's their prediction at this time in place. That will happen


Pollster

Predictit a bookmaker
Screen Shot 2023-07-19 at 10.59.00 AM.webp
 
He couldn't get through many of his policies from the start because:
At the beginning of his presidency he was opposed by not only the Democrats but also leader of the house
Paul Ryan who was & still is an ani-Trumper if there ever was one & a very hostile MSM.

Know this:
Trump has changed the entire spectrum of past voting patterns.
More Democrats have become Trump supporters than there are
followers of republican politicians like Jeff Flake,
'Good ol’ Mittens’, Paul Ryan, Bob Corker, John McCain, & former
republican talking heads Steve Schmidt, Nicole Wallace & George Will to
name a few. These dinosaurs have almost no standing in there former party & have cast there lot with
the MSM the obvious reqiuem for losers.

Add Kinzinger & Liz Cheney to that group of persona-non-grata
Just goes to show how dumb a certain cohort of US voters is; that they actively want a documented thief, fraudster, racist, pathological liar, twice impeached and now indicted moron for president! As if four years of dismal failure wasn't enough, they crave even more lies, broken promises and criminal behaviour!
 
I'm assuming you are a relitively bright person. If my assumption is correct you can't possibly believe the post I'm
replying to. You just support Biden no matter how obvious his greedy nature is. If when Biden received his ill gotten gains
from Ukraine, Romania & China those who sent the moneys accompanied the money with a note saying 'Joe & Hunter;
always glad to do business with you, more to come as we need another of our companies listed on the NYSE regardless of merit'
still that wouldn't be enough proof for you to concede my point.

12 reasonable men acting on this subject reasonably would convict the Biden Crime Family based on the evidence already presented!
Name a crime committed by Biden Sr., or anyone else in his family which in any way comes close to the multiple crimes committed by Trump and his lot.
 
Alright I'll play. It's the wrong thread but let's see what you have.

Look at the bold. Citation, citation, citation and more citation please. Four counts.

Not innuendo, extrapolation or speculation: citation please - four of them.
This is stuff that's easily available on the Internet. Do your own search.
 
Uh, that glove demonstration was indeed evidence.

And regardless of "interpretation, the jurors weigh the evidence.
The evidence was the gloves Chomsky. The demonstration was the interpretation of the gloves in relationship to OJ. They (the evidence) didn't belong to OJ or either his hands grew larger or the gloves (the evidence) shrunk.
 
This is stuff that's easily available on the Internet. Do your own search.
That’s my whole complaint. Nothing but internet rumors.

Every time you guys are asked to front up it’s either “ask google” or “thuh FBI is cuhvering it uhp”.

Pathetic.
 
Wray was being badgered to discuss CI's in an ongoing investigation. No way should he divulge that. I completely disagree with your characterization of the dialogue.
Perhaps if Wray didn't stonewall he wouldn't have been "badgered". What possible CI would be divulged by answering a simple yes or no question? Were FBI agents embedded in the group of rioters? We all know the FBI has used this tactic in other investigations so no CI would be revealed by answering yes or no.
 
That’s my whole complaint. Nothing but internet rumors.

Every time you guys are asked to front up it’s either “ask google” or “thuh FBI is cuhvering it uhp”.

Pathetic.
And almost every time links are provided you guys dismiss them as being bad sources, like Fox. I'm not going to provide you with a source that's easily found on Google or YouTube.
 
So you don't find it odd that back in 2020, the "ONLY" Person in Government, or Government agency of ANY KIND who was trying to get Trump in front of a Court and Judge, was.................................... "TRUMP" ???.....

As for the Jan 6th Sham go watch Trumps lawyer prove that the "Committee" Falsified the evidence to make it SEEM Trump did something wrong!

Clearly, you’re speaking from the alt – right side of your mouth
 
You get nothing because I doubt you're sincerely interested. I don't like wasting my time with people like yourself.
That just tells me you cannot back up your position with concrete facts.

I have a concrete fact though: DJT is being indicted for electoral crimes. Fun times ahead.
 
That just tells me you cannot back up your position with concrete facts.

I have a concrete fact though: DJT is being indicted for electoral crimes. Fun times ahead.
Whatever.
 
So you don't find it odd that back in 2020, the "ONLY" Person in Government, or Government agency of ANY KIND who was trying to get Trump in front of a Court and Judge, was.................................... "TRUMP" ???.....

As for the Jan 6th Sham go watch Trumps lawyer prove that the "Committee" Falsified the evidence to make it SEEM Trump did something wrong!

so, all of those judges and the juries that have found all of those people guilty were political actors and it was all a sham???
 
Perhaps if Wray didn't stonewall he wouldn't have been "badgered". What possible CI would be divulged by answering a simple yes or no question? Were FBI agents embedded in the group of rioters? We all know the FBI has used this tactic in other investigations so no CI would be revealed by answering yes or no.
a person does not give out CI information regardless of who is doing the badgering and especially to someone in Congress.....they can pound sand..
 
a person does not give out CI information regardless of who is doing the badgering and especially to someone in Congress.....they can pound sand..
You have no evidence that such yes or no answers to the question amounts to divulging CI.
 
Do you blame me for thinking you're just wasting my time? I bring it out whenever I sense someone is just trolling.
Um, no one is wasting your time...you aren't forced to be here. You bring little value or facts and when you are confronted with that, you run.
 
It's clear that the FBI is slow-walking the Trump investigations, but Trump is no conservative.
It'd be really dumb to rush an investigation of a former POTUS, especially if all signs point to real criminal activity.
 
Um, no one is wasting your time...you aren't forced to be here. You bring little value or facts and when you are confronted with that, you run.
You presented no facts. Opinions aren't facts.

So . . .

Really . . .

Enjoy the rest of your day.
 
Back
Top Bottom