[W:#7536]FBI executes search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago, former President says

[Paradoxical]

None of them are carrying AKs that I can see.

I entered a search term and in 5 seconds got this from the uber-liberal site Yahoo.

Voices: The FBI raid on Trump’s residence is unprecedented. But it’s not unjustified

In order for a search warrant of this nature to have been legally executed, a judge had to rule there was probable cause that a potential crime had been committed

news.yahoo.com

Note also the spin that Yahoo puts on this.

The MSM know they effed up and are trying whatever they can to sugarcoat it.

 

[Callen]

all he has to do is explain what was the exigent circumstance for a warrant

Easy enough for arm chair quarterbacks to say. We have zero facts to go on other than that the highest levels of the DOJ, a grand jury and a judge felt it was warranted. We don't know why this happened when it did. It may seem to us this happened quickly but that's only because we basically know very little about where they were in the process.

Garland also has to be wary about what information he releases publicly for many reasons one of which is the rights of those being investigated. For all we know they had to act when they did because they knew something was about to change dramatically. How does Garland say that without divulging information that may be politically harmful to Trump or implicate someone else.

All he can say is the DOJ had strong evidence that they needed to act right away.......that will assuage nothing!

 

[Callen]

And the danger was? He was going to sell them to Putin? Get serious. There was zero need to raid his home. ZERO.

What reason did Trump give for taking presidential documents out of the WH in contravention of the Presedential Records Act? Why did he not return all of them when the DOJ requested them?

 

[Paradoxical]

the point was, you asked the same question in february as you are asking now
if it was an answer you truly wanted, you would have figured it out by now
you are the one with no information, which causes you to keep asking the same question
come back and post when you have informed yourself about the topic

Holy smokes! You follow me so closely that you can readily access a post of mine from FEBRUARY!! I wouldn't begin to know how to do that. Is there some trick to it? Or does someone have to examine 46,000 posts and pick one out?

 

[CaughtInThe]

 

[Paradoxical]

A federal judge, who is also a criminal attorney, does not have to explain to you, or to anyone, what evidence of criminal activities the grand jury had. He reviewed the recommendation of the grand jury and felt it warranted a search and seizure order.

You mean that fat slob judge who donated to Obama and Jeb Bush?

 

[snakestretcher]

NO, your willingness to convict a former President based upon hearsay and hatred is what is on display here. What is the next issue you are going to attack Trump on after this one? It is amazing just how much fear there is on the left that Trump will run again and get elected. I get it, we cannot have the American people keeping more of what they earn taking power away from the liberal elites

Conservative attacks on Hillary were based on nothing but hearsay, and as it turned out she had no case to answer. Then, of course, we had the ridiculous, Trump-instigated birther conspiracy circus over Obama's presidency.

 

[Rawley]

Being involved in criminal activity forces government agents to take actions. There's often zero reason for government agents to tase a criminal gangbanger when he won't comply, but it does move the process along a little more quickly.

Comply and 99.9% of the time, things will go better for you.

According to all reports, he was cooperating. He gave them 15 boxes in February. He invited them in in June and the searched the place.. This week, Nancy's stormtroopers show up at his door with their AR15s drawn.

 

[Rawley]

Says who

Says anyone not suffering from TDS

 

[Paradoxical]

And they'd get the same result as when Hillary was investigated, with conservatives drooling over her alleged guilt and wetting themselves at the prospect of her being prosecuted. Except the FBI concluded there wasn't anything to drool over or prosecute-and they're still butthurt.

I'm luvin' this. It backfired bigly on this Gestapo third-world government we woke up to.

Now maybe you realize why our brilliant founders solidified that Americans have the right to keep and bear arms. All one needs to do is witness what a government out of control can do.

 

[snakestretcher]

NO, your willingness to convict a former President based upon hearsay and hatred is what is on display here. What is the next issue you are going to attack Trump on after this one? It is amazing just how much fear there is on the left that Trump will run again and get elected. I get it, we cannot have the American people keeping more of what they earn taking power away from the liberal elites

Hatred? Explain what there is to like about a thief, fraudster, racist and pathological liar? That's your boy, Trump, in case you didn't recognise the description.

 

[snakestretcher]

I'm luvin' this. It backfired bigly on this Gestapo third-world government we woke up to.

Now maybe you realize why our brilliant founders solidified that Americans have the right to keep and bear arms. All one needs to do is witness what a government out of control can do.

What are you babbling about now? Been in the sun too long?

 

[pamak]

When the FBI finally took possession of Hillary's illegal server the email archive had been wiped using a utility. Allegedly all backups had been destroyed. No independent examination of her email archive was ever done.

The FBI had Huma Abadeen cold on illegally storing classified documents on an unsecured device. She didn't know what she was doing. Please.

Trump's staff was negotiating in good faith over the documents when Biden’s DOJ decided to treat it as a criminal matter because Orange man bad. A subpoena would have sufficed to get the documents but that wouldn't have served as a platform to smear Trump.

What do you mean when you say no independent examination was ever done?
The FBI as you said took possession of the server. Are you trying to argue that there was not an investigation because the FBI did not invite the people you wanted to examine the server?

The FBI reopened Hillary's case and DID examine the emails they found in Huma husband's computer. If you disagree with the FBI's decision to continue with charges, this does not mean that the FBI did not examine the evidence they got. The reason the FBI chose not to proceed with charges is explained in the Inspector General's report which took place when Trump was president and which showed that the FBI followed the same legal theory and methodology it has followed in the past for similar cases. Read the report to understand why the FBI decided that it would be very difficult to prove intend.

Sorry but the moment you come here and tell me that you know that Trump's staff was negotiating in "good faith" you reveal an obvious bias. You have no clue about these negotiations

 

[Conservative]

Conservative attacks on Hillary were based on nothing but hearsay, and as it turned out she had no case to answer. Then, of course, we had the ridiculous, Trump-instigated birther conspiracy circus over Obama's presidency.

This conservative attacked Hillary on her resume and policies not her personality and rhetoric. You can divert until hell freezes over but that is the reality

 

[Conservative]

Hatred? Explain what there is to like about a thief, fraudster, racist and pathological liar? That's your boy, Trump, in case you didn't recognise the description.

You will have to tell me first who that is and what a foreigner like you knows about that issue and where you get your information. You have no standing in this country thus no credibility but as usual you put your country first and have a fit when we have someone doing the same thing here

 

[Paradoxical]

Easy enough for arm chair quarterbacks to say. We have zero facts to go on other than that the highest levels of the DOJ, a grand jury and a judge felt it was warranted. We don't know why this happened when it did. It may seem to us this happened quickly but that's only because we basically know very little about where they were in the process.

Garland also has to be wary about what information he releases publicly for many reasons one of which is the rights of those being investigated. For all we know they had to act when they did because they knew something was about to change dramatically. How does Garland say that without divulging information that may be politically harmful to Trump or implicate someone else.

All he can say is the DOJ had strong evidence that they needed to act right away.......that will assuage nothing!

Callen, this is a good thing. The longer it takes them to respond why they would raid an ex-presidents home with 30 plus agents armed to the teeth to retrieve "classified" documents that he had and didn't use against them for two years now, the more it drives the nail further into the coffins of what used to be the Democrat party.

 

[Rawley]

Being involved in criminal activity forces government agents to take actions. There's often zero reason for government agents to tase a criminal gangbanger when he won't comply, but it does move the process along a little more quickly.

Comply and 99.9% of the time, things will go better for you.

WHo is telling you he wasn't complying? Quote someone.

 

[Jredbaron96]

Machine guns then? To raid an ex-presidents residence? Really!

But hey. This is great. The optics of this are stupendous for the rout that the Democrats will get on 11-8. Here is the way I see it. There are far too many far-left liberals in all branches of government today. People like Strzok, McCabe, Comey, Brennan, Weissman, Holder, and they now engage in group think where they live in this bubble that conservatives are all stoopid trailer dwellers and they are the elite because they have 4 years of college and have a government job where THEY are the elite and leaders of America and we WILL do their bidding and have to because they have the guns. They plotted to create a narrative that most conservatives are white supremacists who would kill a governor. They plotted to frame a president.

But, you really have to look at the long-range picture. These little daily events such as raiding an ex-president's home are Banana Republic tactics of a desperate regime that knows they are toast on 11-8 and is doing everything they can to create a narrative that Republicans are bad people. Someone screwed up here big time and it cannot be corrected before 11-8. You don't raid the home of a president that was very popular with half the population. You just create a larger-than-life figure with the people who will back him now more than ever. It's like the King Kong movie where he took everything they threw at him; bullets, fire, missiles, and was still standing, battered, wounded, teetering and on the brink of death and the crowd starts to have sympathy for King Kong. Instead of being the villain, they turned him into a larger-than-life figure who the bad guys wanted to eliminate because they feared him.

At the risk of being hyperbolic, your side didn't "get" Trump. You made him and his supporters a force that will not be defeated. Your side has enraged the common everyday people who do not want 90,000 IRS agents auditing them, green energy policies that will tax and fee us to death, Marxist ideas pervading our schools and government offices, a police state where FBI agents raid the homes of presidents, his attorneys, and congressmen. We have seen quite enough, thank you very much and I will end with a phrase I invented.

Come November....
We WILL remember

I've read psych scribbles more grounded than this.

 

[snakestretcher]

You mean that fat slob judge who donated to Obama and Jeb Bush?

Just like when that fat slob Trump donated to Democrats?

Most of Donald Trump's Political Money Went To Democrats — Until 5 Years Ago

The man making a strong showing for the GOP presidential nomination also has a remarkably inconsistent track record as a conservative.

www.npr.org

History of Donald Trump's political donations, 1989-2015

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

 

[Paradoxical]

What are you babbling about now? Been in the sun too long?

You should try it. The sun contains lots of vitamin D. Gotta get outside soon instead of toying with the librals here.

You seem upset that Americans may be armed and the intent was to protect ourselves from what we witnessed happen to our beloved president the other day. I think the countries where the government only has guns are jealous.

 

[Jredbaron96]

I entered a search term and in 5 seconds got this from the uber-liberal site Yahoo.

Voices: The FBI raid on Trump’s residence is unprecedented. But it’s not unjustified

In order for a search warrant of this nature to have been legally executed, a judge had to rule there was probable cause that a potential crime had been committed

news.yahoo.com

Note also the spin that Yahoo puts on this.

The MSM know they effed up and are trying whatever they can to sugarcoat it.

I don't see the name AK listed anywhere nor an AK rifle appearing in any photo.

 

[Jredbaron96]

Says anyone not suffering from TDS

Where is your evidence that none of the materials were being illegally held?

 

[Paradoxical]

I've read psych scribbles more grounded than this.

That is precisely what an elitist would say and I cringe to think what is gonna happen to that sort of elitist attitude on 11-8.

baying at the moon will be heard all across the land.

 

[Callen]

According to all reports, he was cooperating. He gave them 15 boxes in February. He invited them in in June and the searched the place.. This week, Nancy's stormtroopers show up at his door with their AR15s drawn.

All reports? You mean Trump and his lawyer because there have been no other reports from people with knowledge of the situation.? Why didn't he give them all back? What was the basis for the negotiations?

 

[RedFishBlueFish]

maybe. I bet Garland wont comment unless the Repubs take the House and subpoena him

But Trump could comment now. He could publish the warrant and list of items taken. Why doesn't he?