• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:#7536]FBI executes search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago, former President says

Again, Mr. Dershowitz is a real lawyer. Historically and factually.

The fact that you keep pushing a false assertion of your own opinion as if facts don't matter is what I find amusing.
Dershowitz a lawyer..like Rudy?
 
No, actually, not like that at all. This is a totally different type of warrant

Suh-wing and a miss
You can stop it, too.

Judges issue warrants. Every. Single. Warrant. EVER ISSUED was issued by a judge... who heard the evidence prior to issuance.
 
He'll never cut it as a FOX commentator, they're way past bullets or handcuffs tonight. You might think it's a big deal here, but it's small potatoes compared to the things they are broadcasting right now in front of my own two eyes.
FOX is currently showing video of a hot blonde with a red cap and a flag standing on a beach near Mar a Lago.

Trump: LOOK AT THIS
 
You can stop it, too.

Judges issue warrants. Every. Single. Warrant. EVER ISSUED was issued by a judge... who heard the evidence prior to issuance.
Right. And you are contriving doubt for a specific case only because of a bizarre political fetish. So let's be crystal clear.

And the standard of evidence for the warrants are not the same. So, no, not like the carter Page warrant.

Caps lock will not help you, here.
 
But that lawyer must also ARGUE his position.

In Eastman's case, he argued that his plan was illegal. Did you forget that?

You are slinging mud at Dershowitz, because you are either unable or unwilling to meet his argument with your own.
Dershowitz has no argument. He doesn't even know what the warrant consisted of. So how the hell can he legitimately even comment on it?
 
Right. And you are contriving doubt for a specific case only because of a bizarre political fetish. So let's be crystal clear.

And the standard of evidence for the warrants are not the same. So, no, not like the carter Page warrant.

Caps lock will not hep you, here.
The highlighted is just you projecting.

This is a MUCH bigger deal than you appear to be able to comprehend. I have already said that I HOPE it is legit. The reason that I hope it is, is because I already know what will happen if it isn't.

Good day...
 
Yes, Durham showed us how that worked. If the left get their way, Orwell's 1984 is just around the corner.
So, what do you specifically suggest is inappropriate about the DoJ getting a warrant and executing it on the former president?
 
I heard they broke his safe.

I hope one of them stopped up the toilet, too.
This makes one wonder why Ivanka and Jared went out of their way to keep the Secret Service away from their toilets. Is there a like-father-like-daughter dynamic at play here? What documents has Ivanka flushed away?
 
The highlighted is just you projecting.
No, it's clear by the evidence. You are committing the very childish fallacy of "X happens, therefore this is x". And you are doing it because of political fetishes. Else, you wouldn't make such a silly, egregious error.
 
FOX will have the civil war started by dawn………
"So the question now is no longer 'Should the Jesus Patriots rise?" but rather "What weapons make for the most festive revolt against the satanic American government? Bongino and "Only SotH I recognize" Newty McNewter weigh in right after this quick word from my friends at MyPillow and Pajama Grams!"
 
Yes, he is a real lawyer.... and you can always find a real lawyer that will take any position (see also John Eastman, Rudy Guilliani and Sidney Powell, all real lawyers). Dershowitz notoriously spouts fringe opinions. It is what keeps him relevant on the air. His opinions are rarely conventional. That said, after watching the whole tape, he really doesn't say much of anything. He offered the generic statement that raids are suppose to be done as a last resort, implying (but not really knowing) that this wasn't the last resort. OK, the government will need to be able to justify the raid. Garland is a pretty conservative operator and a very fine legal mind. This is a very, very high profile move for him. I really doubt he was cavalier with this step. He dotted his "i's. Counting on a misstep by him is not a high percentage play.

It was nice hearing Dershowitz talk, as we all know how much he loves to do so, but he really had very little say of note. He didn't even take a fringe position, he just said very little.
Was Alan wearing his bloomers?
 
"Nothing like this has ever happened to a President of the United States before. After working and cooperating with the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate.
Conspiring to stay in power after losing a fair election isn’t appropriate.
 
This makes one wonder why Ivanka and Jared went out of their way to keep the Secret Service away from their toilets. Is there a like-father-like-daughter dynamic at play here? What documents has Ivanka flushed away?
They probably figured the agents would pee on the seat.

They probably would. I would.
 
Back
Top Bottom