• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

[W:720, 995]Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’

Tell me their qualifications that would show they had first hand knowledge of the president's comments.

Your idiotic claim that "2 is standard" is meaningless when you can't even vouch for the sources because you have no clue who they are or if they even exist.

4 sources. They are smart to remain anonymous
 
Time to take your bull**** to the Conspiracy Theory thread. :lol:

You aren't speaking in facts.

You seem very upset.


I bet you hated it when the fox reporter confirmed some of this. Lol
 
They told verified lies, unlike Deep Throat, who directed W&B to where to find the facts.

As with all vegas giants arguments you don't seem to realize that your blind ignorance does more to demean you than it does to push your desired narrative forward.

Wow. You are really upset. Lol
 
4 sources. They are smart to remain anonymous

So you have no clue of their qualifications, you just assume they are qualified because you need the story to be true.

You are definitely the target audience for this blatant propaganda, for sure.
 
So you have no clue of their qualifications, you just assume they are qualified because you need the story to be true.

You are definitely the target audience for this blatant propaganda, for sure.

A half dozen news outlets confirmed the sources are credible
 
Trump could have said it many other times. Or Kelly could be the source


Sorry, but The Atlantic was very specific on the time in their article ...


The Atlantic: "... In a conversation with senior staff members on the morning of the scheduled visit, Trump said, “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.” In a separate conversation on the same trip, Trump referred to the more than 1,800 marines who lost their lives at Belleau Wood as “suckers” for getting killed. ..."


... and every one - except for Kelly - has denied that ... on record.


Are you now saying Kelly stands for 4 anonymous sources?!? :lamo
 
A half dozen news outlets confirmed the sources are credible

How? Through whom did they get their verification? What are the qualifications of THOSE sources?
 
A half dozen news outlets confirmed the sources are credible


That would mean a half dozen news outlets know the names of the sources. Can you give me the links to those news outlets where they themselves confirmed the sources to be credible? Thanks!
 
Which then turns the story into "Remember when Trump said mean things to McCain? Maybe he thinks the same thing about all people in the military!!"

It's stupid rumor mongering and they know it, and can't actually be backed by any evidence.

To be honest, I can easily envision a scenario where Trump is bitching about the Iraq war saying "They get us into these wars that win nothing, but the dead and injured are the losers."
Easy to make that into something it's not.
 
How? Through whom did they get their verification? What are the qualifications of THOSE sources?

Both Jeffrey Goldberg and Jennifer Griffin made their careers with reporting that relied heavily on Pentagon sources. Griffin referenced "former senior administration officials" as her sources. My bet is General John Kelly. He has probably decided Trump should not be the President and he's doing what he can to make sure Trump is not re-elected.
 
Did they use other sources, or the same source as the Atlantic piece?

They likely used the same set of multiple sources.

Fox News confirmed this story. Why isn't that good enough for you? Is Fox News now Fake News?
 
That would mean a half dozen news outlets know the names of the sources. Can you give me the links to those news outlets where they themselves confirmed the sources to be credible? Thanks!

Here, the only thing you watch is Fox News anyway, so why are you asking for all these other "liberal" sources you don't trust to begin with?

Watch the videos in this article and read the article:

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin: ‘My Sources Are Unimpeachable’
 
Time to take your bull**** to the Conspiracy Theory thread. :lol:

You aren't speaking in facts.

It’s not a conspiracy theory when we have public statements and actions proving Trump has disdain for *anyone* who endeavors in any scenario that doesn’t end in personal profit. HE’s made public ****ty comments about those serving before, and he’s lied to our troops, used them as mercenaries - proudly declaring he sent our men and women to Saudi Arabia because they pay cash - and downplayed injuries to them because he thinks projecting being a tough guy makes him one of them.

It’s so funny watching you guys tell us for 4 years that you know he ain’t no saint, and we dont’ need to be his friend, and yada yada yada and then you break out into vapors at someone suggesting a ****ty thing he’s said is true.
 
Both Jeffrey Goldberg and Jennifer Griffin made their careers with reporting that relied heavily on Pentagon sources. Griffin referenced "former senior administration officials" as her sources. My bet is General John Kelly. He has probably decided Trump should not be the President and he's doing what he can to make sure Trump is not re-elected.

Well except for the fact that he's come out and said he's not the source.
 
To be honest, I can easily envision a scenario where Trump is bitching about the Iraq war saying "They get us into these wars that win nothing, but the dead and injured are the losers."
Easy to make that into something it's not.

Losers and suckers



Its disgusting
 
Well except for the fact that he's come out and said he's not the source.

I haven't seen that. Can you prove it? Link?
 
How? Through whom did they get their verification? What are the qualifications of THOSE sources?

Again they are anonymous. Woodward and Bernstein wrote 200 stories on Watergate using mostly anonymous sources
 
They likely used the same set of multiple sources.

Fox News confirmed this story. Why isn't that good enough for you? Is Fox News now Fake News?

So Source A,B,C,D went to Atlantic, and Atlantic ran with it, so Fox said, let's confirm this, and they called Sources A,B,C,D and who clearly confirmed their own story...and Fox confirmed it now....

See how that might be a bit of a problem?
 
Back
Top Bottom