• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: #624] Roe v Wade was a good decision until anti-abortion extremists overturned it , thanks to Trump

No, you are describing as a health risk a risk of life, not health.

If a health issue isn't dangerous to one's life, then it's not a risk by definition. It's an ailment, a symptom, or a minor condition, but not a risk.

If you're claiming there's a difference between a health risk and a health-related risk to one's life, then you're going to have to explain the difference. In the medical world, something is only determined to be risky if it somehow poses a risk of immediate or long-term danger to life, or irreversible damage to one's long-term health.

Otherwise, it's not a risk. We have different levels of care for a reason.

Throwing up due to nausea is a health risk if it happens continuously and often because you cannot take in enough nutrition.

Throwing up repeatedly and lacking nutrition is most-definitely a risk to one's life.

Pre-eclampsia and cancer and internal bleeding are risks of life, not just health.

Yes, that was my entire point.

Same old overemphasis on life and insufficient emphasis on health.

Health maintenance and risk management of serious health conditions are separate concepts. Literally everything one does affects health maintenance, not just going through a pregnancy.

Sickening in and of itself.

Stop with the hysterical bullshit. "Life of the mother" is the well known as the established standard on this topic. Trying to make a case that minor health symptoms that occur in everyday life for everyone makes an abortion a "health risk" issue is goddamned silly.
 
If a health issue isn't dangerous to one's life, then it's not a risk by definition. It's an ailment, a symptom, or a minor condition, but not a risk.

If you're claiming there's a difference between a health risk and a health-related risk to one's life, then you're going to have to explain the difference. In the medical world, something is only determined to be risky if it somehow poses a risk of immediate or long-term danger to life, or irreversible damage to one's long-term health.

Otherwise, it's not a risk. We have different levels of care for a reason.



Throwing up repeatedly and lacking nutrition is most-definitely a risk to one's life.



Yes, that was my entire point.



Health maintenance and risk management of serious health conditions are separate concepts. Literally everything one does affects health maintenance, not just going through a pregnancy.



Stop with the hysterical bullshit. "Life of the mother" is the well known as the established standard on this topic. Trying to make a case that minor health symptoms that occur in everyday life for everyone makes an abortion a "health risk" issue is goddamned silly.
I'm sorry you don't agree. A health risk is not an immediate risk to one's life, and it is the reason that, before Roe v Wade, various states had anti-abortion laws that had exceptions for the health as well as life of the pregnant woman.

Pregnancy is an immunosuppressed state in which the immune system that works all during infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and old age is suppressed and cannot possibly protect the pregnant person well. Various drugs could also sicken the health of or deform the embryo or fetus, so doctors cannot give them to the pregnant person, placing her health still more at risk.

For these reasons, there are huge numbers of health disruptions reported for pregnancy, and some of them can lead to permanent serious illnesses in postnatal life. No one in their right mind can possibly think that a bodily state that can cause a woman's teeth to loosen and hair to fall out is good health. Good grief.

This does not even touch the issue of childbirth as unhealthy for women. Childbirth can cause lifelong bodily injuries, e.g., chipped pelvis, permanent or temporary incontinence, a very large list of horrible problems, and even a caesarian can cause serious health problems, especially if the woman gets pregnant again.

Moreover, deaths from pregnancy and childbirth related causes can be determined up to a year after childbirth, but deaths beyond about 6 weeks are not even figured into the maternal mortality rate.

It is unbelievable to me that anyone imagines that there are no long-term health risks to continuing a pregnancy and giving birth, which is in typical cases a sacrifice that a woman makes to produce a child.
 
I'm sorry you don't agree. A health risk is not an immediate risk to one's life, and it is the reason that, before Roe v Wade, various states had anti-abortion laws that had exceptions for the health as well as life of the pregnant woman.

He made up his own definition of health risk and I dont find it valid. I provided 2 other posts with reasons...being murdered and losing one's job and income and not being able to support self/family. I guess he's chosen not to "see" my posts...too inconvenient. It doesnt erase them tho :)

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Back
Top Bottom