You confuse religion with science and demonstrate your ignorance of both. Researchers provide the evidence. Science is merely a tool. It's like you think people are never cynical and are not trying to prop up their own views at the expense of those of another. Only Creationists have nothing of a material nature to lose...
The idiot left insists developing babies are not human beings but rather 'zygotes'...worthless clumps of tissue...and can be killed in the name of convenience.
The idiot left insists men can be women, women can be men, people can be any of 179 made up pronouns, and all of them can get pregnant. (in which the baby produced can be killed because it is really not human..just a worthless clump of cells.)
The idiot left has pressed to destroy a fossil fuel industry the world NEEDS while touting green energy systems that fail to provide a viable replacement.
The idiot left has spent the last 3 decades promoting the global warming lies that have all fallen flat.
The idiot left blindly swallows every lie they are spoon fed about COVID and vaccines.
And you want to talk about science deniers?
I see you posting them constantly...its gotten pretty easy to recognize mindless drivel.
That's a pathetic piece of rag. Old cliche that "Goddidit."
Rational people know that many Christians - especially those with education - most especially so, apologists - simply don't respond and say, "God did it."
They usually have more to say than just that.
A Pee Wee Herman response.
Science is more than just a tool. It's also a process, methodology, and system of observing, understanding, and explaining how our reality works. It's also the best way to do that while being as objective as possible and reducing bias as much as possible. The strength of one's views is proportional to the objective empirical evidence they can produce to support it. Anyone can have a particular view about something, but without objective evidence, it doesn't have any validity.
It depends on the science. In the soft sciences one can be quite creative with objectivity.
No! The Pee Wee Herman response is, "I know you are but what am I?" Science is a tool and a study, but it can do NOTHING on its own, anymore than any cook book can bake a cake. Science doesn't explain how reality works. The opinions of men who study science come to such conclusions and wrote the cookbook. However, if they ignore data or miss data, such determinations are flawed. I know you now need to study objective empirical evidence as determined by Creation scientists and quit depending on the Atheists and Agnostics of this world to provide you with some UNBIASED view. They cannot and they will not.
Didn't care enough to go through any effort, so I thought I'd ask the guy who used it.
Pointing out the hypocrisy of climate jihadists when they bash religionists, yet have the same silly logic that governs their beliefs, is fun.
Effectively repeating back what I said with a minor alteration, as if you're making some point, is a Pee Wee Herman type response. Juvenile!
Scientific studies and research are often repeated and results verified or not to establish veracity. New evidence or findings may be found, which can affect the results. But each repeat, especially when it yields the same results, only builds on the veracity of the findings and conclusions, as well as diminish potential bias. Science generally does not accept something once and at face value before making a conclusion.
What objective empirical evidence? A "Creationist scientist" already has a built in bias favoring dogma. So do you it would seem. Or do you think "creationist scientists" are not capable of bias as you accuse more non-religious scientists or sources?
Religions historically have provided explanations for that which was unknown (i.e. "God did it."). Over time, especially with the advent of science, we learned that thunder and lightning really are not the result of an angry Zeus or Thor. And in modern times we have learned that human beings, and all other life on this planet, are (almost certainly) the result of billions of years of evolution.
There is data for CHRIST and it is found in an historical document known as the Bible.
Circular logic. That's like saying there is data for Harry Potter in the document known as the Harry Potter book series.
My view is based on science, not on ridiculous end of the world prophecies like your beliefs.
Uh? What other ancient figures' existence do you deny because of Harry Potter books?
Harry Potter was written by one author in a year, about places and individuals that never existed. The Bible was recorded over thousands of years by a variety of writers regarding actual people, places and things. All of it culminated in the birth, death, resurrection, assumption, and the MESSIAH's revelation as Wonderful Counselor, the Mighty GOD. the Everlasting FATHER the Prince of Peace ----- ALL prophesied throughout the books of the Bible.
All of which is still just stories written by multiple authors. But still stories nonetheless.
I deny claims made without evidence.
You mean your BS claim that taxing cow burps will save the earth? Thats true, no one with common sense would buy it.
Which doesn't really address your circular logic claim.
