• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: #593] Correlation Between Religiosity And Scientific Illiteracy Or Hostility

So......Still waiting.
No, you used this in the context of a discussion about why atheists are atheists. You said that the atheists that you know are all atheist because they hate believers. You never questioned theists about their real motivation for believing.
 
You ignore evidence when it is presented because it runs counter to your belief.
What evidence? Show it

When you can give me one good reason to indulge a conspiracy nutter.
Youre not indulging me, youre proving it to the others who read this. But since you keep failing at it, then youre just lying.

Well thank goodness nobody is doing that. The consensus arises from the evidence. Not the other way around.

And you are free to go get an education and do research to challenge it. So is everyone else.

So spare me your whi ing. You are on the outside looking in because you are wrong and know less than nothing about any of it anyway. That's your fault. Nobody else's.
Argumentum ad populum is exactly what youre doing- you keep harping about consensus when that is not science. There's a consensus amongst billions of Catholics that Jesus is God, so that means you believe it too since there's a billion of them.
 
What evidence? Show it


Youre not indulging me, youre proving it to the others who read this. But since you keep failing at it, then youre just lying.


Argumentum ad populum is exactly what youre doing- you keep harping about consensus when that is not science. There's a consensus amongst billions of Catholics that Jesus is God, so that means you believe it too since there's a billion of them.
Why would I bother to show you? I have just dealt with two deniers and they turned out to be of no consequence with their crap understanding of science. And that is all a denier can offer, pure crap. So why would I waste time when you cannot offer me the same in return.

It is not a case of I cannot show you evidence. It is a case of your not worth the effort .
 
What evidence? Show it


Youre not indulging me, youre proving it to the others who read this. But since you keep failing at it, then youre just lying.


Argumentum ad populum is exactly what youre doing- you keep harping about consensus when that is not science. There's a consensus amongst billions of Catholics that Jesus is God, so that means you believe it too since there's a billion of them.

I gave a link to the evidence.
 
Argumentum ad populum is exactly what youre doing
False
The consensus is a symptom of the evidence. I argue to the evidence. This childish crap will never work for you. Not ever.
 
Why would I bother to show you? I have just dealt with two deniers and they turned out to be of no consequence with their crap understanding of science. And that is all a denier can offer, pure crap. So why would I waste time when you cannot offer me the same in return.

It is not a case of I cannot show you evidence. It is a case of your not worth the effort .
This is a public forum, and the fact that you cannot show any evidence to me, or to anyone else who reads your BS proves youve lied.

I gave a link to the evidence.
No you didnt.

False
The consensus is a symptom of the evidence. I argue to the evidence. This childish crap will never work for you. Not ever.
The consensus is simply hyperbolic propaganda. The majority of Germans believed that Hitler was a good man to. According to your crappy logic, they were right.
 
This is a public forum, and the fact that you cannot show any evidence to me, or to anyone else who reads your BS proves youve lied.


No you didnt.


The consensus is simply hyperbolic propaganda. The majority of Germans believed that Hitler was a good man to. According to your crappy logic, they were right.

Yes, I did. But your belief in a CT prevented you from seeing it.
 
This is a public forum, and the fact that you cannot show any evidence to me, or to anyone else who reads your BS proves youve lied.


No you didnt.


The consensus is simply hyperbolic propaganda. The majority of Germans believed that Hitler was a good man to. According to your crappy logic, they were right.
It is not a fact that I cannot show evidence. The evidence is there for anyone to see quite plainly. The real question is why would I waste my time when you can do nothing more than make up a some conspiracy crap or just advertise your useless at science.
 
The consensus is simply hyperbolic propaganda.
Another stupid lie. You don't even know what the consensus is, that much is crystal clear.
 
Yes, I did. But your belief in a CT prevented you from seeing it.
Nope, you never did. Show us the links now.

It is not a fact that I cannot show evidence.
Yes it is. If there was any you'd have shown it.

Another stupid lie. You don't even know what the consensus is, that much is crystal clear.
More climate cult propaganda. There never was any consensus.

 
Nope, you never did. Show us the links now.


Yes it is. If there was any you'd have shown it.


More climate cult propaganda. There never was any consensus.


Nice conspiracy theory video. Try again.
 
See post #550.
"Most atheists I know are atheists because their parents were jerks" ≠ "atheists that you know are all atheist because they hate believers"

No response to the several posts where I questions theists' about their real motivation for believing?
 
Most recently, Gallup found 81%of Americans expressing belief when asked the simple question, "Do you believe in God?
This was down from 87% in 2017 and a record low for this question first asked in 1944, when 96% believed. It reached a high of 98% in the 1950s and 1960s.
You cherry picked the 81% from the article which goes on to give lower percentages depending on how the question is asked.

No matter how the question is asked religion in the US is in decline according to the Gallup Poll.
 
No response to the several posts where I questions theists' about their real motivation for believing?
Its pretty simple, gullible, exploitable, naive, simple, dupable, weak, needy cult followers.
 
Nope, you never did. Show us the links now.


Yes it is. If there was any you'd have shown it.


More climate cult propaganda. There never was any consensus.

When you can tell me why I would bother with someone who cannot return the favour of an intelligent conversation on the subject.
 
Its pretty simple, gullible, exploitable, naive, simple, dupable, weak, needy cult followers.
Whether it be stereotyping complete races, religions, or genders, this kind of generalization has a way of biting you later on.

Sorry you feel that way though.
 
Nice conspiracy theory video. Try again.
Ah so you lied again as usual. You be you.

When you can tell me why I would bother with someone who cannot return the favour of an intelligent conversation on the subject.
When you cannot prove what you claim, then you told a lie. Even a child can figure that out.
 
Ah so you lied again as usual. You be you.


When you cannot prove what you claim, then you told a lie. Even a child can figure that out.
And again it is not that I cannot. It is that I see no reason to indulge you. After all it is not as if you can provide anything even remotely suggesting evidence or even an educated opinion in return.
 
And again it is not that I cannot. It is that I see no reason to indulge you. After all it is not as if you can provide anything even remotely suggesting evidence or even an educated opinion in return.
It's not about indulging me, its about proving to everyone who reads this that youre supposedly telling the truth, when in fact, its the opposite.
 
It's not about indulging me, its about proving to everyone who reads this that youre supposedly telling the truth, when in fact, its the opposite.
Of course it is about indulging you. A conversation with people who actually understand that climate change is happening and that human activity is the main driver would be about how we deal with it. It would not be a waste of everyone's time as it would be with you still pushing what can only be described as the loony tune section of the band. Deniers are simply people who are not worth wasting time on. I would ask you to prove you are not but I just really could not care less about your opinion on climate change.
 
Ah so you lied again as usual. You be you.


When you cannot prove what you claim, then you told a lie. Even a child can figure that out.


I didn’t lie about anything. Same straw from you. Your CT video is what it is.
 
Of course it is about indulging you. A conversation with people who actually understand that climate change is happening and that human activity is the main driver would be about how we deal with it. It would not be a waste of everyone's time as it would be with you still pushing what can only be described as the loony tune section of the band. Deniers are simply people who are not worth wasting time on. I would ask you to prove you are not but I just really could not care less about your opinion on climate change.
This isnt a private conversation, its public. Anyone can read it, so it means if you defend your claim then others will see it aside from me.

The fact that you refuse to post any evidence in a public forum, is proof you are lying, not just to me, but to everyone else.

I didn’t lie about anything. Same straw from you. Your CT video is what it is.
Since you also failed to provide any proof of your claims, you are also lying. Thanks for admitting it.
 
Back
Top Bottom