- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 68,960
- Reaction score
- 22,530
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
From Associated Press
President-elect says Guatemala can’t do migrant deal with US
GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — A Guatemalan immigration agreement signed with the Trump administration won’t work because the Central American nation does not have the resources, the country’s new president-elect says.
Alejandro Giammattei, a conservative who was chosen overwhelmingly by voters in a weekend runoff election, said in an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday that Guatemala is too poor to tend to its own people, let alone those from other countries.
The agreement signed in July by the outgoing administration of President Jimmy Morales would require migrants from other countries who cross into Guatemala to apply for asylum here rather than in the U.S.
“In order to be a safe country, one has to be certified as such by an international body, and I do not think Guatemala fulfills the requirements to be a third safe country. That definition doesn’t fit us,” said Giammattei, a 63-year-old doctor.
COMMENT:-
It looks like this is yet another "deal" that has absolutely no substance (and never was intended to have any), BUT since negotiations over the "secret protocols" are still ongoing, I rather suspect that it is possible that one of the things that is under discussion is how much money the US government will be paying to the Guatemalan government every month to cover the costs of dealing with the people who are being "retained" in Guatemala (and how soon after the first missed payment "the deal" expires).
But, then again, everyone knows that I'm a cynic.
How come Canada doesn't take this flood of refugees in? I thought you were supposed to be the nice guys?
Just give the word and we'll send you 100,000 of them.
The president of Guatemala is trying to shake us down for money.
Canada has taken in about 60,000 Syrian refugees since 2015 (I think). Seamlessly. And we can't handle the number of refugees crossing from the USA already. So you'll have to solve this yourselves.
They can't do that! A newly-elected President can't renege on an agreement made by his predecessor!
Can he?
From Associated Press
President-elect says Guatemala can’t do migrant deal with US
GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — A Guatemalan immigration agreement signed with the Trump administration won’t work because the Central American nation does not have the resources, the country’s new president-elect says.
Alejandro Giammattei, a conservative who was chosen overwhelmingly by voters in a weekend runoff election, said in an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday that Guatemala is too poor to tend to its own people, let alone those from other countries.
The agreement signed in July by the outgoing administration of President Jimmy Morales would require migrants from other countries who cross into Guatemala to apply for asylum here rather than in the U.S.
“In order to be a safe country, one has to be certified as such by an international body, and I do not think Guatemala fulfills the requirements to be a third safe country. That definition doesn’t fit us,” said Giammattei, a 63-year-old doctor.
COMMENT:-
It looks like this is yet another "deal" that has absolutely no substance (and never was intended to have any), BUT since negotiations over the "secret protocols" are still ongoing, I rather suspect that it is possible that one of the things that is under discussion is how much money the US government will be paying to the Guatemalan government every month to cover the costs of dealing with the people who are being "retained" in Guatemala (and how soon after the first missed payment "the deal" expires).
But, then again, everyone knows that I'm a cynic.
They can't do that! A newly-elected President can't renege on an agreement made by his predecessor!
Can he?
We could ask Trump.They can't do that! A newly-elected President can't renege on an agreement made by his predecessor!
Can he?
More money would grease the squeaky wheel?
We took in Syrian refugees too. That was then, this is now.
Why doesn't Canada take in 100,000 Honduran refugees?
Canada has taken in about 60,000 Syrian refugees since 2015 (I think). Seamlessly. And we can't handle the number of refugees crossing from the USA already. So you'll have to solve this yourselves.
Because they are smarter than that is my best guess.
They can't do that! A newly-elected President can't renege on an agreement made by his predecessor!
Can he?
How come Canada doesn't take this flood of refugees in? I thought you were supposed to be the nice guys?
Just give the word and we'll send you 100,000 of them.
The president of Guatemala is trying to shake us down for money.
We took in Syrian refugees too. That was then, this is now.
Why doesn't Canada take in 100,000 Honduran refugees?
Sure he can, I guess. It's irrelevant because our president can damn sure cut off the $300 million a year that we give to Guatemala. I bet that'll change their tune.
Canada has taken in about 60,000 Syrian refugees since 2015 (I think). Seamlessly. And we can't handle the number of refugees crossing from the USA already. So you'll have to solve this yourselves.
The solution is to bus them all to the Canadian border and tell them: "Ve al norte y Canadá te cuidará"
Sure you can. You're the beacon of humanitarianism in North America, aren't you? You've got more space than we do, and 1/10th of the population. You've got the room, and you've got the moral superiority.
So, we can start sending them through any time.
Or is your objection to Honduran refugees actually something else?
Where they will be greeted with
"Welcome to Canada. Please produce your passports and visas (if required). Anyone who does not have both a passport and a visa (if required) will not be admitted to Canada and will have to return to the United States of America. If you intend to make a claim for refugee status, and if you are entering Canada from the United States of America, your claim is barred by the terms of Canadian and American law so you will be denied entry to Canada and you will have to return to the United States of America."
"Bienvenue au Canada. Veuillez produire vos passeports et visas (si nécessaire). Les personnes qui ne possèdent pas à la fois un passeport et un visa (si nécessaire) ne seront pas admises au Canada et devront retourner aux États-Unis d'Amérique. Si vous avez l'intention de demander le statut de réfugié et si vous entrez au Canada en provenance des États-Unis d'Amérique, votre demande est interdite par les dispositions des lois Canadiennes et Américaines, de sorte que l'entrée au Canada vous sera refusée et que vous devrez revenir aux États-Unis d'Amérique."
The possibility that the people attempting to force others across the Canadian border with the United States of America will be arrested and charged with "Unlawful Confinement", "Kidnapping", "Assault", and/or "Illegal Possession of a Firearm" cannot be completely ruled out.
Not legally you can't.
If you don't like the laws that your own government insisted be passed, then why not get your own government to change the laws of the United States of America?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?