• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:55] Tulsi Gabbard Releases Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’ On Trump

The NYT is a mouthpiece for the intelligence agencies.


You paint the entire Trump/Russia investigation as solely relying upon the Steel dossier. That just is not true. The FBI and other intelligence agencies had their own intelligence pointing to a Russia/Trump link and the absolute conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Trump.

But this is all orchestrated to distract from Trump and Epstein and you fell into the trap.
 
A CIA official is accusing someone else of lying? That's rich
Trump accuses others of lying all the time. That's rich-and also laughably hypocritical.



 
A CIA official is accusing someone else of lying? That's rich
The issue, that you are trying to deflect, is whether Tulsi Gabbard and the White House were lying when they claim that it was an attempt to sabotage President Donald Trump.

Susan Miller, a retired CIA officer who helped lead the team that produced the report about Russia’s actions during the 2016 campaign, told NBC News the report was based on credible information that showed Moscow sought to help Trump win the election. That's the bottom line. She also said there was no conspiracy between the two.
 
You paint the entire Trump/Russia investigation as solely relying upon the Steel dossier. That just is not true.
Not quite. Strawman noted. It was a big part of it. They never would have gotten the FISA warrants on Carter Page without the Steele Dossier.

The Steele Dossier was also used for:

-Crossfire Hurricane investigation
-briefing of President elect Trump Jan 6th 2017
-Intelligence Community Assessment
-Mueller Investigation
-Senate Intelligence Committee briefing 2018
-Liar Schiff read it into the Congressional Record
The FBI and other intelligence agencies had their own intelligence pointing to a Russia/Trump link and the absolute conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Trump.
The predicate to start Crossfire Hurricane was extremely weak. I have a feeling they will declassify more about this too.


1000008904.webp

But this is all orchestrated to distract from Trump and Epstein and you fell into the trap.
This has been in the works for a while.
 

Attachments

  • 1000008904.webp
    1000008904.webp
    45.7 KB · Views: 1
Twitter posts aren't equivalent to credible news organization. That's why one can't use Twitter posts as an OP in Breaking News.
 
Here's the truth.
de031951ea954ced3145d983bee5f736a2ea554b00383845d298808ed07f8270.png
When people can not back up their positions with reasoned arguments and simply rely on inflammatory allegations with zero siubstance then one has two choices-ignore and put the person on ignore and the second is respond.

I will do both.


Hee hee I call Michelle a man hee hee

1753629762327.webp


Well at least someone has balls you refer to.
 
Twitter posts aren't equivalent to credible news organization. That's why one can't use Twitter posts as an OP in Breaking News.
"Credible news organization"

Like the the news organizations that told us Joe Biden was fine cognitively and only had a stutter?

The only people who still think the corporate media are credible are Democrats.
 
You need to be more specific. What page do you think establishes a motive other than election security?
 
Obama was after Trump ever since, and probably even before, the Correspondents' Dinner roasting he delivered.
For those who don't remember.

Wow. Trump smears Obama for years about his birth, without evidence, without anything. Obama takes it in stride, with a sense of humor (which the Donald utterly lacks), and gives a gentle ribbing in return at a comedic event. And that is evidence that he is "after" Trump? And when Trump finally admitted that Obama was born in the US, did he even apologize? Of course not, because it nothing more than a poorly constructed hoax all along.
 
Wow. Trump smears Obama for years about his birth, without evidence, without anything. Obama takes it in stride, with a sense of humor (which the Donald utterly lacks), and gives a gentle ribbing in return at a comedic event. And that is evidence that he is "after" Trump? And when Trump finally admitted that Obama was born in the US, did he even apologize? Of course not, because it nothing more than a poorly constructed hoax all along.
Hillary created the Obama birther conspiracy.
 
Oh? Here's the ICA. Which parts of it are from the dossier?

The Steele Dossier was included in the ICA as a 2 pages annex despite CIA analysts and officials that criticized it's poor sourcing and corroboration. Brennan's response to those analysts was:

“Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?” after he was told it “failed to meet basic tradecraft standards.”
 
You're talking about the Real Clear Investigations article. If you had checked my previous posts in this thread, you would see by the content that I had seen and read it, and there is nothing that is "real clear" in it at all. It cherry-picked certain exchanges in Henry's testimony and put them in an order to make it seem he said something that he hadn't said. If you truly want to know what was said, then you should read the transcript of his testimony—particularly pages 74 through 77 and Representative Swalwell's follow-up questioning on pages 78 through 80.

That's not accurate. Henry said they didn't have evidence Russia exfiltrated the data.
 
Hillary created the Obama birther conspiracy.
You just are repeating lies, damaging whatever reputation that you hae.

There is no evidence to support the claim Clinton started the birther movement

 
The Steele Dossier was included in the ICA as a 2 pages annex despite CIA analysts and officials that criticized it's poor sourcing and corroboration. Brennan's response to those analysts was:

“Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?” after he was told it “failed to meet basic tradecraft standards.”
I gave you a link to the ICA. There's no annex in there regarding the dossier.

Annex A: Russia -- Kremlin's TV Seeks To Influence Politics, Fuel Discontent in US*

Annex B: ESTIMATIVE LANGUAGE

So show me where in there I can find it.
 
You just are repeating lies, damaging whatever reputation that you hae.

There is no evidence to support the claim Clinton started the birther movement

Two supporters of Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign reportedly shared the claim that then-rival Barack Obama was not born in the United States and thus was not eligible to be president.

One was a volunteer in Iowa, who was fired, Clinton’s former campaign manager said Friday. The other was Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal, according to a former McClatchy Washington Bureau chief.

 
Back
Top Bottom