• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:55] Tulsi Gabbard Releases Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’ On Trump

Sorry, I don't take reading assignments. If you can't muster a response of your own, then don't bother posting.
You have again admitted you are bluffing your way through this topic. Gert this clear-your uncited subjective opinions mean sweet phack all and if you can't back your opinions up with any objective evidence run along. This is not a forum where you come, spew crap and then complain if someone asks you to prove what you say with some sort of basis.

You think this forum is a toilet for you to sit on and share your crap with.
 
What a remarkably stupid thing to say when you follow it up with this:

You cant really be serious now. Screen recorders are a dime a dozen.

So now it's screen recorders? Your thought now is to rapidly scroll through the log creating VIDEO and then take the video and covert it to text document? Is that your new idiotic strategy to solve a problem no hacker has? :rolleyes:

Put that to the test. Go start up a screen recording, scroll through a long text document and then try to use any other software to convert that video into OCR compatible format so that you can recreate that document in it's original format.

Caveat: You will need to use software that was available in 2016

Good luck!

Your problem is thats not at all what I'm describing at all, and yours so desperate to be seen as a voice of expertise that youre trying too hard to grand stand in front of the rest of MAGA.

Here's an actual process; run a screen capture program on your own computer, and set it to record one monitor. Remote in using your software of choice and link the remote display to the monitor that is being recorded.

From there its a simple task to access the emails and format the view to your liking, then either run an autoclicker or a script that matches the key inputs to whatever the email program uses to shift between emails. Itd be a simple trial and error process to accommodate for latency.

Once you got what you need, remote out and end the screen recording, then run the video file through a video-to-picture program to produce images out of each frame; I do this myself with YouTube videos for drawing references.

Voila! You have effectively screenshots of emails without needing to download or transfer any files since your capture software is only active on your machine and the video file it creates is stored locally.

Did the Russians use this method? Not idea, and while I guess you can argue if they're technically screenshots, its a completely plausible way to get a bunch of information withoit needing to do any actual data transfer from the remotely access server.

Again, your explanation above if absolute nonsense. Nothing works the way you think it does and you only type the nonsense because you don't know how stupid your theory actually is.

This is not a method anybody uses because a hacker that has full access to the server with the desired data DOWNLOADS the data. There is no purpose for this system you have proposed.
 
Sorry, I don't take reading assignments. If you can't muster a response of your own, then don't bother posting.
Yes, you are obviously not a reader. Since we're now pretending we can tell each other what to do- How about you post when you've chosen to be less ignorant...and, I do mean leave the site for good.
 
There was an investigation.
The results of which indicated zero inclination by FBI investigators/leadership to believe Traitor Trump, himself, colluded with the Russian government/Putin.
 
Looks like you're completely unaware that many of her missing emails were recovered, despite her email server being out of commission.
'recovered' is misleading.
Hillary (and her team) only delivered the emails which they wanted to deliver, a point of recurring contention between them the judge in the case.

So yes, it could have been possible for Russia to find some.
This more so, and more likely the case, from the Russians having already hacked Hillary's private email server while it was in operation, than anything else.

And again, they tried just hours after Trump's encouragement.
This your demanded conclusion which you are so desperately clinging to.
Is there any proof that it was the Russians which sent those phish emails?

Nonsense.

hack

to gain illegal access to (a computer network, system, etc.)
How does a phish email 'gain illegal access to (a computer network, system, etc.)'?
Especially if you don't click the link?
Answer: It doesn't. All emails, including phish emails, are just data, and are not, in and of themselves 'active'. Phish emails are 'activated' when a user licks the link they contain, possibly downloading compromising SW.
 
FFS the denail is thick with you. But hey, you voted for a pedophile and a convicted felon. You must be so proud.
The American people voted for an American patriot as their president. They didn't want a non-natural born Citizen (Kamala) as their usurper.
 
Tulsi told us that whistleblowers provided documents. that means that government employees saved original documents in real time and recently became whistleblowers. Obama and Biden’s people did everything they could to scrub all Russia hoax documents but it was too late as whistleblowers had already saved copies of the original documents and they are witnesses. They saw that the intelligence assessments were being ignored as it was happening before and after false claims were being made in the press.
 
Update!

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Releases Reports PROVING Barack Obama DIRECTLY Gave the Order to Publish Russia Collusion Hoax Knowing There Was NO EVIDENCE to Back It Up – Full Document Release Below​



 
So now it's screen recorders? Your thought now is to rapidly scroll through the log creating VIDEO and then take the video and covert it to text document? Is that your new idiotic strategy to solve a problem no hacker has? :rolleyes:

Put that to the test. Go start up a screen recording, scroll through a long text document and then try to use any other software to convert that video into OCR compatible format so that you can recreate that document in it's original format.

So real question man; do you just not know there exists the ability to turn frames of a video to common image formats? Do you not know you can cycle through individual emails in an inbox with simple key strokes?

Caveat: You will need to use software that was available in 2016

All of the technology I've described already existed before 2010.

Again, your explanation above if absolute nonsense. Nothing works the way you think it does and you only type the nonsense because you don't know how stupid your theory actually is.

This is not a method anybody uses because a hacker that has full access to the server with the desired data DOWNLOADS the data. There is no purpose for this system you have proposed.

This whole conversation started because you disputed the idea Henry had put forward about the lack of clear evidence of data exfiltration that information could still have been captured using screenshots.

You disputed first with a red herring about how a server log looks (which you then admitted was irrelevant because based on the formatting in the leaks) then you completely garbled the actual process I was describing, and now youre just trying to pretend to be an expert.
 
Update!

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Releases Reports PROVING Barack Obama DIRECTLY Gave the Order to Publish Russia Collusion Hoax Knowing There Was NO EVIDENCE to Back It Up – Full Document Release Below​



Tyler Durden says …! 🤣😄🤣😄🤣😄🤣
 
Update!

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Releases Reports PROVING Barack Obama DIRECTLY Gave the Order to Publish Russia Collusion Hoax Knowing There Was NO EVIDENCE to Back It Up – Full Document Release Below​



Lol.

Do you have a credible source?
 
A plurality of Americans are responsible for again electing the worst president in our country’s history.

Harris was born in Oakland, CA. Derp.
She was born to two non citizens. She is not a natural born Citizen. Anchor babies are not natural born Citizens. Trump is the best president in modern times.
 
So you're bent out of shape because some Russian approached the Trump campaign claiming to have dirt on Clinton
They did more than that.
but are willing to ignore that Clinton, through her lawyers, put together the Steele dossier,
So? The creation of the Steele Dossier was not an illegal act. They also never used it for anything.


concocted the Alpha Bank story
Then Sussman kept it out of the press.



and got the entirety of the IC to run the "Russiagate" narrative through a fully complicit cabam of media facilitators. Your political passions just might be coloring your sense of reality.
I mean if you want to color a Presidential campaign working really hard to obtain stolen material for a hostile foreign government as a “narrative”… it’s a weird way to put it… but you do you.
 
Which makes what you said bullshit and innuendo. Examining the other side, they actually received and used Russian assistance in the form of the Steele Dossier. The primary source was a Russian, which always seems to fly under the consciousness of every Democrat in the country.
Yep. They did opposition research and didn’t use it.

The horror.
 
She was born to two non citizens. She is not a natural born Citizen. Anchor babies are not natural born Citizens. Trump is the best president in modern times.
All people born in the US, except those born to people under diplomatic immunity are natural born citizens.

And "anchor baby" is a slur, fighting words.

anchor baby


[ang-ker bey-bee]

Phonetic (Standard)IPA

noun​

Disparaging and Offensive.
  1. a term used to refer to a baby born to an undocumented mother in a country where the baby becomes a citizen at birth


Do you also call people n***ers and kikes?
 
'recovered' is misleading.
Hillary (and her team) only delivered the emails which they wanted to deliver, a point of recurring contention between them the judge in the case.


This more so, and more likely the case, from the Russians having already hacked Hillary's private email server while it was in operation, than anything else.


This your demanded conclusion which you are so desperately clinging to.
Is there any proof that it was the Russians which sent those phish emails?


How does a phish email 'gain illegal access to (a computer network, system, etc.)'?
Especially if you don't click the link?
Answer: It doesn't. All emails, including phish emails, are just data, and are not, in and of themselves 'active'. Phish emails are 'activated' when a user licks the link they contain, possibly downloading compromising SW.
Recovered is the right word. They were recovered from other devices and from other peoples' emails she corresponded with.

There's no evidence her server was ever successfully hacked.

Yes. GRU.

Installing malaria. Phishing is used to gain illegal access to a computer, network, system. The very definition of the word, "hack."
 
Back
Top Bottom