• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:#4341]Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade

Yes. There dads and uncles went to a store and purchased a firearm gor a child to use. Where I live..children can hunt at nine years old. How are they supposed to hunt if they don't have a firearm available. ?
Cripes..because an adult can purchase a firearm for a child to use under supervision is NOT the equivalent of a 6 year old walking I to a Walmart to buy a glock pistol!!!
Your kind of hyperbolic paranoia about guns is why you gun control advocates have no credibility.
Damn right I groom my kids!!!.
I own lots of firearms and hunting and shooting is a family tradition..not to mention a .means of protection where I live.
Why in the heck would I NOT be teaching my children how to be responsible and safe around firearms!!!????.
You want people to be responsible gun owners? They have to be taught!!!
Or do you want kids learning about firearms through watching movies made by baldwin???.
Sweet baby Jesus.
And there is a father in Highland Park, a Trump supporter and former candidate for mayor btw, who bought his underage son guns....guns that kid used to go and shoot people at a 4th of July parade....so, now he is in hot water.....yes, he may be in legal trouble and financial trouble over this.
 
You are actually going to portray ignorance of candidate Biden promising "Bingo, I am coming for your assault weapon" or spoon feed you the widely publicized attacks on pregnancy support centers and churches by groups like Jane's revenge? These are specific search engine arguments. The question is, are you going to towards educating yourself?
Just show your links.
 
And there is a father in Highland Park, a Trump supporter and former candidate for mayor btw, who bought his underage son guns....guns that kid used to go and shoot people at a 4th of July parade....so, now he is in hot water.....yes, he may be in legal trouble and financial trouble over this.
Let's see. The shooter was not underage. He was 21.
And he legally purchased his firearms.
And passed the background check from the dealer he picked them up from.
 
He was underage when the guns were purchased in 2019.
Um no
He legally purchased them from a gun dealer and went through a background check.
He was not " under age".
 
Just show your links.
Show your ability to do simple Internet searches. If it was some esoteric point you'd might be justified in your demand but you are just using a demand for links to deflect from the issue at hand.
 
Show your ability to do simple Internet searches. If it was some esoteric point you'd might be justified in your demand but you are just using a demand for links to deflect from the issue at hand.
The fact you aren't willing to back up your posts is telling.
See..you made an statement ..
So let's see where you got that statement and then go from there.
 
Show your ability to do simple Internet searches. If it was some esoteric point you'd might be justified in your demand but you are just using a demand for links to deflect from the issue at hand.

It's up to you to support it. Not make others look for things that might not even exist.
 
The fact you aren't willing to back up your posts is telling.
See..you made an statement ..
So let's see where you got that statement and then go from there.
The fact you cannot perform a simple Internet search but insist I must spoon feed you the facts is telling.

Do you really think when Biden announced his intention to seize assault weapons no media covered the story? Do you think the attacks by Jane's Revenge and others are mythical creations of fringe media?
 
It's up to you to support it. Not make others look for things that might not even exist.
I am not obligated to prove widely reported facts to satisfy demands of the petulant children.
 
The fact you cannot perform a simple Internet search but insist I must spoon feed you the facts is telling.

Do you really think when Biden announced his intention to seize assault weapons no media covered the story? Do you think the attacks by Jane's Revenge and others are mythical creations of fringe media?
Just back up your claims...
See..I doubt that Biden plans to personally come to my house and " seize my assault weapons"..
In fact I very much doubt he plans on sending atf to seize them.
But let's see your evidence.
Plus I have never heard of " Jane's revenge".
But I would love to see your evidence. Let's see how big they are..lets see what they have actually done and let's see your evidence that police saw it all and did nothing.
So let's see what you got other than claims.
 
Exactly.
From your link.
BIDEN: No, that's not walking into their homes, knocking on their doors, going through their gun cabinet, et cetera.

So he just states he is not coming to seize my assault weapons.
Not my contention. I am just hoping and wishing that you and Lursa and AZRWinger will knock it off already about links to assault weapons in a thread about Roe v. Wade. I mean, c'mon, please. It's like an elementary school playground in here.
 
Not my contention. I am just hoping and wishing that you and Lursa and AZRWinger will knock it off already about links to assault weapons in a thread about Roe v. Wade. I mean, c'mon, please. It's like an elementary school playground in here.
Welcome to dp forums.
 
Exactly.
From your link.
BIDEN: No, that's not walking into their homes, knocking on their doors, going through their gun cabinet, et cetera.

So he just states he is not coming to seize my assault weapons.
From the linked article
"
COOPER: So, to gun owners out there who say, well, a Biden administration means they're going to come for my guns?

BIDEN: Bingo. You're right if you have an assault weapon. The fact of the matter is, they should be illegal, period"

You got the link you were demanding yet deny the plain words of our President's attack on out 2A rights.
 
Not my contention. I am just hoping and wishing that you and Lursa and AZRWinger will knock it off already about links to assault weapons in a thread about Roe v. Wade. I mean, c'mon, please. It's like an elementary school playground in here.
Oh I agree, the juvenile demands for links to widely available information is elementary schoolyard tactics.
 
Just back up your claims...
See..I doubt that Biden plans to personally come to my house and " seize my assault weapons"..
In fact I very much doubt he plans on sending atf to seize them.
But let's see your evidence.
Plus I have never heard of " Jane's revenge".
But I would love to see your evidence. Let's see how big they are..lets see what they have actually done and let's see your evidence that police saw it all and did nothing.
So let's see what you got other than claims.
From Wikipedia

"Jane's Revenge is an American militant,[1][2][3] extremist,[4][5][6] pro-abortion rights group that has claimed responsibility for several acts of firebombing, vandalism, and arson, targeting crisis pregnancy centers and a Congressional office.[6] It was formed in May 2022 after a leak of the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson"


It's one thing to be ignorant, it's another to brag that because you don't know means it doesn't exist.
 
From the linked article
"
COOPER: So, to gun owners out there who say, well, a Biden administration means they're going to come for my guns?

BIDEN: Bingo. You're right if you have an assault weapon. The fact of the matter is, they should be illegal, period"

You got the link you were demanding yet deny the plain words of our President's attack on out 2A rights.
Cuz then they followed up and he stated that it didn't mean going house to house and seizing assault weapons.
No
police searches etc.
 
From Wikipedia

"Jane's Revenge is an American militant,[1][2][3] extremist,[4][5][6] pro-abortion rights group that has claimed responsibility for several acts of firebombing, vandalism, and arson, targeting crisis pregnancy centers and a Congressional office.[6] It was formed in May 2022 after a leak of the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson"


It's one thing to be ignorant, it's another to brag that because you don't know means it doesn't exist.
That's nice..and exactly how big are they and evidence that law enforcement stands by watching them commit violent forces.?
 
Says someone who can't find a quote from Joe Biden, LOL.

Was I asked to? And if it was to support someone else's statements no, why would I bother. It just shows they lied.

Are you lying here? Why wont you support it as asked?
 
Cuz then they followed up and he stated that it didn't mean going house to house and seizing assault weapons.
No
police searches etc.
Biden stated assault weapons should be illegal petiod. You asked for a link, mocked when asked to look it up, now you deny the plain meaning of his statement.

Too lazy to do a simple search but plenty of energy to scour the article for a lame promise to exercise restraint enforcing the surrender of a Constitutional right. Brilliant.
 
Back
Top Bottom