Re: What all atheists believe
An entity (entities) existing that "created" everything else that exists. A creator god.
If you have no evidence*, it's an imaginary, not real, concept. Fictional writers create imaginary concepts all the time, why is this so strange to you?
*Knowledge of reality ultimately requires evidence/observation of that reality. You have none, thus, its currently just an imaginary concept.
You haven't defined your position of whether there are any gods or not. You might want to start there.
Why should I? It's not critical to showing you the errors in your claims.
Most classic concepts of gods of gods are based on evidence/observation of reality. They are all imaginary concepts. Imaginary things are by definition, not real. Simple right?
Those that are based on reality, become indistinguishable from real things...the Sun, the Moon, the Nature, etc. And that's just semantics.
There may be more that exists that cannot be observed by humans...than exists that that can be.
I will repeat. What thing are you referring to that you know exists, but can't in principle be observed? You can't name it, because it's not real.
If you cannot identify such a thing from reality, then you are offering us yet another imaginary concept (not based on reality). Imaginary things don't exist Frank.
There may be dimensions of existence that we cannot even conceive of. If you think that humans, and what humans can perceive or otherwise sense, is all that can exist...not much I can do about that.
Where is the evidence of this "other dimension" concept? If there is no evidence, it's again...imaginary.
Or did you mean to claim these "others dimensions of existence" are real, and you can prove them?
Which is it Frank? If you don't know, then leave it to those who do, right?
Why do you keep running from a simple philosophy question Frank? Third time, trying to get you to respond without running:
Definition: Mog: I am making up an imaginary entity that doesn't exist.
Claim: A Mog does not exist.
Question: Is the above claim, a claim *about* reality?
The claim is either about reality, or its about not. Which is it Frank? You have the definition, and the claim, don't be frightened, you can correct yourself if all that occurs is an error.