• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:33] Peter Strzok illegally altered 302 in order tom reopen Flynn case after FBI closed it

And then it was released in the Meuller Report. Horowitz did an investigation, Durham being used for pure hack politics.

An FBI lawyer is under criminal investigation for allegedly altering a document related to the surveillance of onetime Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz uncovered the document as part of his investigation into alleged Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuses, which concluded in September, and has been in contact with Durham. The Connecticut-based prosecutor's administrative review, overseen by Attorney General William Barr, turned into a criminal investigation this fall, giving Durham the power to impanel a grand jury and hand down indictments.


FBI lawyer under criminal investigation for altering document related to Carter Page surveillance
 
The whole investigation has to be completed before the DOJ can charge someone? Did Mueller break this rule?

The DOJ does not file charges the first day it finds evidence of a crime. It waits until finishing the entire investigation pertinent to that crime.
 
“To be clear, we now know by the production of new text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok that there in fact exists an original 302 document created by SSA 1 from his own notes of the January 24, 2017 ambush interview of Gen Flynn,” said Powell. “Further, we know in fact that SSA 1’s original 302 document went to Stzrok who rewrote it substantially, but tried not to “completely re-write it so as to save [redacted] voice” and then was shared by Stzrok with a “pissed off” Page who revised it substantively yet again, crafting the narrative to charge Gen Flynn with a crime he did not commit.”

Powell: More Evidence Shows FBI Set Up Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. No Evidence He Committed A Crime. - Sara A. Carter

This kind of deliberate crime committed by a top Justice Department official in a seditious effort to destroy the elected President of the US is reprehensible and this crook needs to go to prison.

Strange how Trump's DOJ never seems to prosecute people that Trumpists claim committed crimes. Hell, Sessions could have convened a grand jury re: Hillary if she'd actually done anything wrong. He didn't because he knew she didn't actually do what you lot claimed. For the same reason, Barr won't be prosecuting Strzok for whatever it is you/your source claims he did.

See, there's a problem: you have to convince a jury to convict.
 
The DOJ does not file charges the first day it finds evidence of a crime. It waits until finishing the entire investigation pertinent to that crime.

Is this based on your vast experience with the DOJ or just more excuse making?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Strange how Trump's DOJ never seems to prosecute people that Trumpists claim committed crimes. Hell, Sessions could have convened a grand jury re: Hillary if she'd actually done anything wrong. He didn't because he knew she didn't actually do what you lot claimed. For the same reason, Barr won't be prosecuting Strzok for whatever it is you/your source claims he did.

See, there's a problem: you have to convince a jury to convict.

Mueller is well aware of that fact. That is why he indicted Russians who he never planned to come to America to be tried to charge with stealing DNC emails and giving them to Assange. He never proved that allegation but he does not have to prove it if Russians never show up for trial, giving leftist liberals all the room to need for declaring Mueller's unverified speculations and unproven allegations to be proven facts. If one of the Russians ever did show up for trial all Mueller had to do to avoid having to try to prove his allegations would be to drop the charges. Pretty slick on Mueller's part.

DOJ abruptly drops once-heralded prosecution of Russian troll farm initiated by Mueller | Fox News

Of the 13 Russians and three Russian companies charged by Mueller in the social media disinformation effort, Concord was the sole defendant to enter an appearance in Washington’s federal court and contest and the allegations. Mueller's 37-page indictment said the actions detailed by prosecutors dated back to 2014. (Mueller later brought separate charges in the summer of 2018 against other entities related to a hack of Democrats' emails.)
 
Back
Top Bottom