Yes, those are the papers for the case that was dismissed after the judge ruled the plaintiff failed to raise any valid claims.Oh darn, owned by your own link...
Got anything else?
Yes, those are the papers for the case that was dismissed after the judge ruled the plaintiff failed to raise any valid claims.Oh darn, owned by your own link...
Already discussed why the case was dismissed. Nothing to do with its merit.Yes, those are the papers for the case that was dismissed. Got anything else?
That allegation is ancient history. The case was dismissed in 2016 and was determined to have been orchestrated by disgraced attorney Norm Lubow and anti-Trump activist Steve Baer.
Already discussed why the case was dismissed. Nothing to do with its merit.
Just pointing out that you’ve now alluded to reporting the forum on several occasions.And?
Lol - it had everything to do with its merit. There were no facts there. Case dismissed.Already discussed why the case was dismissed. Nothing to do with its merit.
LOL. I see what you did there.Noem has a way of dealing with dogs![]()
Well, if people didn’t get so carried away in partisanship that they openly make terroristic threats against Federal law enforcement and elected officials and commit slander, defamation, and libel then it wouldn’t be necessary to point out. I don’t know what your point is other than maybe you thinking DP should be a cesspit of that unlawful garbage.Just pointing out that you’ve now alluded to reporting the forum on several occasions.
So you admit to one at Butler, I quoted 2 others and now this thread.
That's not why the case was dismissed. The judge made no ruling on the evidence itself.Lol - it had everything to do with its merit. There were no facts there. Case dismissed.
Can you show an “openly” “terroristic threat”? What, exactly, has been “unlawful”?Well, if people didn’t get so carried away in partisanship that they openly make terroristic threats against Federal law enforcement and elected officials and commit slander, defamation, and libel then it wouldn’t be necessary to point out. I don’t know what your point is other than maybe you thinking DP should be a cesspit of that unlawful garbage.
As for this thread - it should be moved to the CT subforum.
Come on, Allan. Cheap shotHistory is relevant today in light of the fact Trump won't release the files of his "best friend for 10 years" Jeffrey Epstein
Link to all this please. I'd like to see the judge's ruling for the dismissal and the judge's determination that it was orchestrated by Lubow and Baer.
Here we have it in a nutshell, folks.It doesn't matter if the claims are real…
Slander is spoken words. You don't know a thing about it.The slander, defamation, and libel of accusing people of being “child rapists.” Particularly in the context of false allegations that were publicly debunked almost 10 years ago.
You should learn to control yourself by not posting hot garbage that was debunked almost ten years ago and continuing to promote it after being provided proof of same. At this point you are repeating a serious accusation of a crime knowing that it is absolutely false. And you know what that is.Slander is spoken words. You don't know a thing about it.
You shouldn't be threatening the forum itself or specific members for expressing opinions about news stories.
I can say I believe Trump is a sexual predator. That is protected speech in both our constitutions.
I provided court evidence.You should learn to control yourself by not posting hot garbage that was debunked almost ten years ago and continuing to promote it after being provided proof of same.
You’re engaging in defamation and libel. You posted a court filing proven to be false and dismissed almost 10 years ago. You were provided proof of same and continue running with the false accusation.I provided court evidence.
You've not debunked anything in fact your links are a 'self-goal' as the folks at FIFA would call it.
You’re engaging in defamation and libel
It was never "proven to be false". The judge made no ruling on the veracity of the allegations.You posted a court filing proven to be false
Wrong. "California case was dropped for failing to state a proper claim under the law it cited."Lol - it had everything to do with its merit. There were no facts there. Case dismissed.
False on both points. See post 5.It was never "proven to be false". The judge made no ruling on the veracity of the allegations.
It does if it's not filed properly, which is what happened.If a case has merit, it doesn't get dismissed.
That allegation is ancient history. The case was dismissed in 2016 and was determined to have been orchestrated by disgraced attorney Norm Lubow and anti-Trump activist Steve Baer.
Some sick people will continue with spreading such stuff as the TDS has taken over the brain.
Show one ****ing ruling where it plainly says the 'accusations are false'. Because that is not how it went down at all.You should learn to control yourself by not posting hot garbage that was debunked almost ten years ago and continuing to promote it after being provided proof of same. At this point you are repeating a serious accusation of a crime knowing that it is absolutely false. And you know what that is.