[W#271][W:914] Charlie Kirk Reportedly Shot in Utah: Live Updates

[Hamish Howl]

This is where we’re heading. No more debating. Winning elections is all that matters.

Welcome to the last 50 years of American politics.

 

[jaeger19]

What did the guy who arrogantly said he was the "science" say about masks at the start of Covid? Don't look it up because I remember it. "Masks MAY stop a few viruses, but they do NOT provide the level; of protection people think they do." The thing is, he never said he was referring to a cloth mask. Cloth masks were never worn by humans before, unless you go back to the plague. So, he was referring to MEDICAL masks as not working. HE was the "science" you so arrogantly refer to.

Sweet baby Jesus.
You know years ago, before Covid I argued vehemently on the forum AGAINST vaccine mandates . Let people make their own choices I said. When people are informed they make the right decision I said. Better than the government that might be corrupted by big pharma I said.”
I argued with Lursa , and a number of others .
( some still on the forum”,)

Then came Covid and posts like YOURS. Like the one you just posted and I realized they were right and I was wrong. There is a significant portion of the public that WISHES TO REMAIN SELECTIVELY STUPID.
And they need to be ordered what to do when their actions endanger others.

Let’s break down your last post that illustrates this WILLFUL STUPIDITY.

It’s been explained to you that there are TWO reasons for mask wearing.

ONE is for self protection. And wearing a mask alone particularly a surgical mask offers very limited protection for the wearer because the mucosa of the eyes are exposed. Without gloves any touching of the mask can transit to the face etc
( sound familiar? Lmao)
Wait you don’t get it. THIS IS WHAT FAUCI WAS REFERRING TO “ self protection”.

THE SECOND WAY MASKS WORK is for protecting other in other words SOURCE CONTROL.
If you unknowingly have Covid but are wearing a mask, even a cotton mask you have significantly less chance of infecting other people.

 

[jaeger19]

Your argument was trashed days ago.

I also asked you to name a Kimmel joke about Biden. Maybe you can do that since you can't quote Charie Kirk in full.

“The late night host roasted President Biden one last time during Thursday’s (Jan. 16) episode as Biden prepared to step down from the White House in just days.


“The speech was 18 minutes long which is also the amount of time it takes him to pee,” Kimmel joked.
He described the farewell address as “more like a stern talking-to.” As Kimmel explained it, Biden mainly touched on “threats to democracy, including the decline of American journalism, the dangerous seeds of oligarchy, where too much power and influence is in the hands of a wealthy few.”

But the speech ultimately amounted to this, Kimmel said: “Basically his message was, I’m getting the hell out of here, you probably should, too.”

Kimmel also noted that the president will be leaving office the lowest approval rating of his term at 36%.

“The good news is he won’t remember any of it,” he joked.

 

[Ouroboros]

It's never happened simply because it makes no sense. That's why it came from your head and not reality.

I agree that it makes no sense for Hollywood Libs to defend the Lie of Jimmy Kimmel, but it does make sense that their pressure influenced Disney/ABC through claims that subscribers ought to cancel their Disney accounts, among other things.

 

[Ouroboros]

False again. You repeated words from your own imagination. In reality, I've said I don't know if Robinson is leftwing or rightwing. Meaning I believe he could turn out to be either. It would be helpful if you'd debate with others and not with yourself.

What criteria would convince you that Robinson was leftwing or rightwing? Would it be the testimony of the shooter himself? But if so why would you trust the testimony of a piece of shit? If he would kill, why would he blanche at lying?

 

[Ouroboros]

Prove it, dont just keep regurgitating your grievances.

Another distraction? Why not just prove I was wrong? You know you would if you could



I see you followed my "cue" like a charm

Keep on sealioning. I already trashed your arguments and you had nothing in response but this sealioning.

 

[Ouroboros]

“The late night host roasted President Biden one last time during Thursday’s (Jan. 16) episode as Biden prepared to step down from the White House in just days.


“The speech was 18 minutes long which is also the amount of time it takes him to pee,” Kimmel joked.
He described the farewell address as “more like a stern talking-to.” As Kimmel explained it, Biden mainly touched on “threats to democracy, including the decline of American journalism, the dangerous seeds of oligarchy, where too much power and influence is in the hands of a wealthy few.”

But the speech ultimately amounted to this, Kimmel said: “Basically his message was, I’m getting the hell out of here, you probably should, too.”

Kimmel also noted that the president will be leaving office the lowest approval rating of his term at 36%.

“The good news is he won’t remember any of it,” he joked.

I'd still be more impressed if it came from Lursa, who's the one who made the claim re Kimmel. That's the only way she can work through her allergy to full quotes.

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

I picked this post, one of many concerning the identification of Righties with guns, since it's funny now that they've shown that TR's gun club was full of Lefties. Note the gun club's name.

MSN

And....Lefties don't care for Fascism. Or Government Tyranny.

I'd say fascists have good cause to be concerned? Would you agree with that? I wonder how many more will be doing public rabble rousing speaking engagements?

These are interesting times we're living in.

 

[Jagged]

I agree that it makes no sense for Hollywood Libs to defend the Lie of Jimmy Kimmel, but it does make sense that their pressure influenced Disney/ABC through claims that subscribers ought to cancel their Disney accounts, among other things.

Too bad for you, he didn't lie. That too stems from your own imagination.

 

[Jagged]

What criteria would convince you that Robinson was leftwing or rightwing? Would it be the testimony of the shooter himself? But if so why would you trust the testimony of a piece of shit? If he would kill, why would he blanche at lying?

If I saw him supporting a political party in the past, that might help. If he was associated with a group politically, that also might help. But him being gay doesn't prove it. His mother saying he was becoming more leftwing doesn't either.

 

[jaeger19]

I'd still be more impressed if it came from Lursa, who's the one who made the claim re Kimmel. That's the only way she can work through her allergy to full quotes.

Oh that’s right . You aren’t concerned with objective facts .
My bad.

 

[jaeger19]

Yet Libs are comfortable typing Cons at every turn. Aren't you the one who argued that it was somehow logical to suppose that TR was a Con because he knew how to use guns? If not, I'm sure you've said things equally stereotypical.

Says the guy whose favorite saying is mad libs”?
People in glass houses.

 

[rahl]

Oh look, you got a like from @trixare4kids for lying about what I said. Watch as I expose you two as tweetle-dee and tweetle-dumb.

Yes, I answered your moronic strawman days ago, in post #223 in the thread about how Goebbels ended the careers of 5 comedians for making fun of the nazis.

Will showing how you've been lying about me not answering a question you asked repeatedly that I actually did answer get you to stop? No, of course not. You won't stop lying and trolling.

I just don’t understand why you keep lying. There is a written record kept on this forum. So when you continue to lie it’s really weird. B

 

[Phys251]

I picked this post, one of many concerning the identification of Righties with guns, since it's funny now that they've shown that TR's gun club was full of Lefties. Note the gun club's name.

MSN

Your stupid deflection doesn't answer my questions.

 

[Lursa]

Whatever 'quote' or info you are referring to, you'll need to post it. Or you're just making up that there's something relevant missing. The fact that YOU CAN quote the actual quote in full...and refuse to...shows you're wrong about my argument. Because if you could prove me wrong, you know you would

Keep on sealioning. I already trashed your arguments and you had nothing in response but this sealioning.

More moaning and woe. Prove it, dont just keep regurgitating your grievances. Quote where you succeeded at any 'trashing.'

Why not just prove I was wrong? You know you would if you could

I see you followed my "cue" like a charm

 

[Lursa]

I'd still be more impressed if it came from Lursa, who's the one who made the claim re Kimmel. That's the only way she can work through her allergy to full quotes.

So predictable (Cue: "na huh! You didnt know of any!" Another imaginary grievance *tsk tsk*)

 

[Lursa]

Oh that’s right . You aren’t concerned with objective facts .
My bad.

He wants people to jump thru hoops for him when he cant even work competently with the quotes I've provided in the past. He has to distract from those after creating his personal little dumpster fires. Which he proudly keeps bumping, under the guise of victimhood.

People have different needs for gratification...he's happy to display his here.

 

[Jagged]

I just don’t understand why you keep lying. There is a written record kept on this forum. So when you continue to lie it’s really weird. B

Your lies never cease, do they?

You claimed I didn't answer your question. That's a lie as I did answer it. And I told you which post of mine contained my answer to your question. Who knows why you persist lying about that? Trolling?

 

[What if...?]

Cheering on murder is definitively psychopathic.

So, supporting our troops at war is psychopathic?

War is murder after all.

We are a murderous species that only has a problem with some murder while cheering on other murder.

As a person who believes we live multiple lives on our way to the godhead I don’t really have a problem with murder. Getting murdered would obviously be one of the lessons one needs to learn.

Christianity still has more blood on Its hands than Islam, doesn’t it? Certainly more than Buddhism.

 

[What if...?]

ONE persons opinion. No more valuable than Kirks was. Should Dowd be assassinated becasue someone didn’t agree with his “opinion”? There is absolutely NO excuse for the political assassination, nor the cheering of such by some. Our Country is headed in a very bad direction.

I’m not sure “assassination” is the right term.

It rings y’all’s bells and gets you all hyped up.

But I’m not sure one can assassinate an edge lording internet influencer.

Murder, yes.

 

[Trump]

I’m not sure “assassination” is the right term.

It rings y’all’s bells and gets you all hyped up.

But I’m not sure one can assassinate an edge lording internet influencer.

Murder, yes.

Charlie Kirk was a major architect of Trump cabinet and major player in winning the youth vote for Trump. Do more research

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/15/rfk-kirk-architect-merger-trump-00564197

Charlie Kirk: How a teenage activist became such a close Trump ally

Kirk's loyalty towards the first family put him at the very centre of Donald Trump's Maga movement.

www.bbc.com

 

[rahl]

Your lies never cease, do they?

You claimed I didn't answer your question.

That isn’t a claim. You haven’t answered it. That is a fact.

That's a lie as I did answer it.

This is a lie.

And I told you which post of mine contained my answer to your question.

There was no answer to my question in that post.

Who knows why you persist lying about that? Trolling?

Why do you keep lying about answering when you know you didn’t?

 

[TamleeB]

I’m not sure “assassination” is the right term.

It rings y’all’s bells and gets you all hyped up.

But I’m not sure one can assassinate an edge lording internet influencer.

Murder, yes.

Actually, “assassination” is the exact correct term. Here…this might help you out.

Assassination | Meaning, Definition, Examples, Victims, Word Origin, & History | Britannica

Assassination, the killing of a public figure, such as a government leader or other prominent person, for political purposes. This might be done to seize power, to start a revolution, or to undermine a regime or its critics. Such politically motivated murders have taken place in all parts of the...

www.britannica.com

 

[Jagged]

That isn’t a claim. You haven’t answered it. That is a fact.

This is a lie.

There was no answer to my question in that post.

Why do you keep lying about answering when you know you didn’t?

Damn, you're seriously quadrupling down on lying?? Here you are asking me the question you claim I didn't answer.

So you agree Kimmel was fired by a private company, and Trump nor the government had anything to do with it, because they have no such authority over a private company.

And here I am, answering the question you repeatedly, and falsely, claimed I didn't answer.

Nope, I don't agree with that.

I would hope this would get you to stop lying, but I suspect you can't stop trolling.

 

[rahl]

Damn, you're seriously quadrupling down on lying?? Here you are asking me the question you claim I didn't answer.

​

And here I am, answering the question you repeatedly, and falsely, claimed I didn't answer.

​

I would hope this would get you to stop lying, but I suspect you can't stop trolling.

So you reject reality, as Trump nor the government fired Kimmel. A private company did.

You are so bad at this.