That's why you don't just rely on one source of information.You're right semantically, which means that your OP is wrong on the same grounds.
1) Giuliani did not receive the laptop, his lawyer received a hard drive with the supposed contents of the laptop. So your OP is wrong that a "laptop" was distributed, it was contents from that hard drive.
Giuliani never had the hard drive...only a copy like everyone else. (except the FBI)2) Giuliani eventually took possession of the hard drive, or at least a copy of it.
There is a lot of evidence, including witnesses and work orders with signatures.3) There is no evidence that Hunter Biden ever had the supposed laptop left at the Delaware shop.
I am not responsible for the education of you or any other poster.Rather stupid of you to "correct" the other poster without explaining the reasons.
My gawd, do you know what you just said?But that fact is he didn't commit any impeachable offenses.
Biden's crimes on the other hand, took place while he was VP - and after. God knows how he's paying off China while in office??
Truth be told, the only way to stop the Establishment and America's collapse into tyranny is to wipe Washinton D.C. and New York City off the map. All of those people, all the way down to secretaries and butlers need to be purged from society.
That would be a good start.
The only thing you disputed in my post was whether or not the supposed laptop was ever in Hunter's possession.That's why you don't just rely on one source of information.
The fact is, Maxey never had the laptop...only a copy of the hard drive.
Giuliani never had the hard drive...only a copy like everyone else. (except the FBI)
There is a lot of evidence, including witnesses and work orders with signatures.
Seriously...since the media gave up on the "Russia" nonsense, nobody disputes this is Hunter's laptop.
In April 2019, someone dropped off three water-damaged laptops with him for repair, Mac Isaac claimed. He couldn’t say for sure who dropped them off, because he is legally blind, but he said the person identified himself as Hunter Biden and signed a receipt with what appears to be Hunter’s name.
Then why bother telling someone they are wrong without showing them why? Most likely it's because you don't have the facts right either.I am not responsible for the education of you or any other poster.
It hardly matters. The ghoulish Right is after something on Joe Biden and they are not going to get it through this Hunter laptop nonsense.The only thing you disputed in my post was whether or not the supposed laptop was ever in Hunter's possession.
The only person to have witnessed the drop off of the laptop was the legally blind computer shop owner, and even he didn't know who it was.
The return of Hunter Biden’s laptop
A recent New York Times story has made it the subject of discussion again.www.vox.com
Then why bother telling someone they are wrong without showing them why? Most likely it's because you don't have the facts right either.
lol did it help you to get that off your chest? Does it help you believe it?
So you do think asking for a comment from the accused amounts to good investigative journalism.But...they did look into it. That's what those two articles show, isn't it? And there was even a NYTimes article. Of course you know the one: it was the article where it had conservatives running around screaming "The New York Times admits the laptop is real! The New York Times admits the laptop is real!" as if that was ever in dispute.
No, Trump did not commit any impeachable offenses.My gawd, do you know what you just said?
Trump did not commit any impeachable offenses?
Yes he did and it was clearly proven. Unfortunately the Senate Republicans (who had the majority) decided even before the impeachment began that they were not going to find Trump guilty, no matter what proof was shown. In all trials, if you have the jury bought and paid for, you will never be convicted. Talk about the Washington corruption that you are pushing forward, this is the #1 example of that.
As far as Biden, you are already convicting him much like the Republican Senators were finding Trump innocent, without actually listening to witnesses and proving that he did something wrong.
In one fell swoop you, yourself, are doing exactly what you are accusing Washington of doing...................collapsing into the tyranny of letting one man say what is and what isn't without using the law that has been established.
By the way and talking about tyranny:
Trump was a tyrant inasmuch as he wanted to be the law. He wanted to do what he wanted to do no matter if it was legal, no matter if it was against the benefit of the nation, no matter is there was overwhelming opposition. You talk about tyranny but you support a tyrant! How does that work?
At least the Democrats believe in Democracy, inasmuch as the try to work within the laws and parameters that the Constitution states.
Yes, there is corruption everywhere but it is far less when things cannot be done without a majority being in favor (Democracy) than when it is ONE man doing what he wants.
Are you blind to that?
I refuse to continue talking to a blind-by-choice person as you have shown yourself to be.No, Trump did not commit any impeachable offenses.
The whole Russiagate thing was absurd, and hopefully Comey and co. end up in prison... but as I said, that isn't how Washington works.
As for Biden, there is already enough information available to say that yes, he is guilty of many crimes.
I saw last night that YahooNews (very leftwing) reported that when a Chinese arms dealer was arrested, his first phone call was to Joe Biden's brother, lol... how does that happen??
You really need to stop watching the leftwing, Establishment propaganda, it's got you pretty messed up.
Good lord, you have TDS...I refuse to continue talking to a blind-by-choice person as you have shown yourself to be.
The evidence is overwhelming that Trump was guilty of not only what he was impeached for but for countless of other things that he did while in office that he was not officially charged with but was guilty of.
You talk about the Russia gate situation?
Why don't you explain these FACTS that are data history (no opinion involved)
1) when he couldn't get a loan from a U.S. bank he got the loans he needed from a Russian backed bank (Deutsche Bank)
2) he joined up with the Bayrock Group in 2001 and was with them for 7 years. Bayrock Group was Russian Based and with ties the Russian Mafia an Putin. It is wasn't for them, Trump would not have gotten back up economically.
3) He never criticized or said "anything" negative about Putin. Nonetheless, he abased every other world leader
4) He had Manafort be his campaign manager. Manafort was working for the Russians
5) He asked Russia to find him the 30,000 emails that Hillary had lost and the next day, Russia complied with his wishes
6) the people working close to Trump in the administration met with Russians and Putin 259 times. What is super fishy is that they lied about the meetings under oath
7) Putin wanted to have a Miss Universe in Moscow and Trump gave him his wishes
8) Trump has supported Putin at every step of the way and even called him a "genius" for his invasion of Ukraine
any you say "russiagate". Heck, Trump has been oozing Putin out of his pores for over 20 years.
Great God your mind is being controlled by a Manhattan conman.Good lord, you have TDS...
There's no point addressing anything on your list because it has nothing to do with his time in office.
He was impeached on demonstrably provable false charges, and the people who committed those crimes have been removed from office, but only a couple have been indicted.
The Steele dossier was a fabrication that was paid for by Hillary Clinton - that is not on dispute. Comey lied, McCabe lied, Strozk lied, etc.
Tell me, the "honey pot" they tried to run on Papadopoulos was hilarious right??!! Even a liberal Democrat has to admit that was funny
It doesn't get much more absurd than that, lol...
Who’s Pat Boone?Maybe you also believe Pat Boone is really about to make a movie.
hey, if it helps you sleep at night, you believe whatever you like ok?Nobody cares about Hunter Biden's laptop but the morons who still pout about Trump losing to a very old man.
That's obvious to anyone with a fully formed brain.
Real what?hey, if it helps you sleep at night, you believe whatever you like ok?
the rest of us will debate the possibilities with what we now have confirmation from the NY times, as being real.
please attempt to keep up, if its not too much trouble.Real what?
Back atcha.please attempt to keep up, if its not too much trouble.
Just another anti American supporting the anti American garbage Trump. Right wingers have become pathetic in this country.Good lord, you have TDS...
There's no point addressing anything on your list because it has nothing to do with his time in office.
He was impeached on demonstrably provable false charges, and the people who committed those crimes have been removed from office, but only a couple have been indicted.
The Steele dossier was a fabrication that was paid for by Hillary Clinton - that is not on dispute. Comey lied, McCabe lied, Strozk lied, etc.
Tell me, the "honey pot" they tried to run on Papadopoulos was hilarious right??!! Even a liberal Democrat has to admit that was funny
It doesn't get much more absurd than that, lol...
Real what?
So, it just appeared out of nowhere?Like the laptop being real, where previously it didn't exsist.
No, I'm an independent. I'm not a fan of Trump's bombast and antics, so I pay exactly zero attention to it. Just as I pay zero attention to the MSM.Great God your mind is being controlled by a Manhattan conman.
So, it just appeared out of nowhere?
Seems awful silly as a topic of discussion
No shit Sherlock. That's why it's silly.(Hint) It already existed, unlike some new reports.
(sigh) I'm afraid you are failing in your conclusion efforts.... MSM lied , because it was Hunters laptop.Back atcha.
A real laptop. So what?
If you think it makes your imagination real, you're sorely mistaken
hey, if it helps you sleep at night, you believe whatever you like ok?
the rest of us will debate the possibilities with what we now have confirmation from the NY times, as being real.
Well it’s simple, really. The logic chain goes something like this:Why would knowing that nobody cares about Hunter Biden (a private citizen) but Trump's loyalists help me sleep at night? I sleep well at night. I don't think about Trump's drooling idiot base.
You have what confirmation from the NY Times? Evidence that Joe Biden committed some crime? Link that please. I didn't see it.
Neither the OP nor any of my posts have stated that I now for a fact that Joe Biden is guilty of a crime. The assertion for that is being injected by desperate moron leftists who believe they need to get out in front of this and cuss out other posters in order to stomp this down before we (god forbid) DO FIND OUT something bad about the aholes currently in charge of this country.Why would knowing that nobody cares about Hunter Biden (a private citizen) but Trump's loyalists help me sleep at night? I sleep well at night. I don't think about Trump's drooling idiot base.
You have what confirmation from the NY Times? Evidence that Joe Biden committed some crime? Link that please. I didn't see it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?