[W:241]Trump Was Enraged by Funeral Cost for ‘F–king Mexican’ U.S. Soldier: Report

[Cosmo]

Again, a credible source. Stop trolling this thread.

Do you support trump's racism?

Do you support trump's reneging on his offer to pay for the funeral?

Do you support unicorns and sentient hockey pucks from the Andromeda Galaxy?

 

[Cosmo]

Well, this is something reported in a magazine

OH WOW A MAGAZINE MUST BE TOTALLY TRUE!

 

[Pyrite]

@Pyrite:
Again, a credible source. Stop trolling this thread.
Do you support trump's racism?
Do you support trump's reneging on his offer to pay for the funeral?

Do you support unicorns and sentient hockey pucks from the Andromeda Galaxy?

In other words, yes, you do support trump's racism and his reneging on his promise to pay for the funeral.

Why is that? Are both the anti-Mexican-American racism and the cheating/reneging things you would do?

 

[ElChupacabra]

OH WOW A MAGAZINE MUST BE TOTALLY TRUE!

OH WOW A MAGAZINE MIST BE TOTALLY FALSE!

Sounds equally dumb, and even worse when emphasized by all caps, no?

Of course you continue to insist on a point I'm not making, and haven't addressed the one I actually made.

 

[Cosmo]

OH WOW A MAGAZINE MIST BE TOTALLY FALSE!

I didn't say it was false, I said it was unsubstantiated. I don't expect someone like you to comprehend the difference.

 

[Showtime586]

Oh wow sounds reliable!

Are you denying that Trump has a history of making these types of remarks?
Are you also denying that Trump refused to pay for the funeral AFTER promising to do so?

 

[Showtime586]

^^More really stupid stories for the easily deceived or duped.^^


Alex Pfeiffer, a spokesperson for Trump, said in a statement to the Atlantic that Trump never referred to Guillén as a “f---ing Mexican.”
“President Donald Trump never said that,” he said. “This is an outrageous lie from The Atlantic two weeks before the election.”

Trump Raged at Slain Soldier’s Funeral Bill: ‘$60K to Bury a F***ing Mexican’

Donald Trump raged when he learned the funeral bill for Vanessa Guillén—the U.S. soldier who was sexually harassed and horrifically murdered by a male soldier at Fort Hood in 2020—cost $60,000, a bombshell report revealed Tuesday.That outburst came after Trump invited Guillén’s loved ones to the...

news.yahoo.com

View attachment 67538991
Donald Trump met with Gloria Guillén, the mother Vanessa Guillén, in 2020.


We all know why this has been published. The Latino vote is going big for President Trump so they are running shit like this.........

Trump meets with Latino leaders after new poll shows him 11 points ahead of Harris in key voting bloc​

Trump holds roundtable with Latino leaders at Trump National Doral in Miami​

Trump meets with Latino leaders after new poll shows him 11 points ahead of Harris in key voting bloc

Former President Trump held a roundtable with Latino leaders in Miami after a new poll showed he is significantly leading Vice President Harris in the key voting bloc.

www.foxnews.com

Was Alex P in the room at the time?

 

[multivita-man]

Oh wow sounds reliable!

It's consistent with statements he's made in public and with what numerous others with access to the president have said about him. Live in denial as you wish, but there are consequences for it. This shitty part is the rest of us have to pay for you perpetually wearing your blinders. God damn right I resent it, too.

 

[Showtime586]

He offered publicly to pay for the funeral and thus far has refused. Her parents verified that. So, you were saying?

@Cosmo will run from that question.....lol

 

[ElChupacabra]

I didn't say it was false, I said it was unsubstantiated. I don't expect someone like you to comprehend the difference.

If you read what I wrote and actually thought about it, you'll see how your response makes no sense, but perhaps "someone like you" can't comprehend the point. Nowhere did I say the story was true, I actually questioned whether it was. However, in your need to provide a knee-jerk response, all of this escaped you.

 

[Cosmo]

Are you denying that Trump has a history of making these types of remarks?

What's this? Some clumsy leftist way of trying to shift the burden of proof?

 

[Cosmo]

@Cosmo will run from that question.....lol

Run from what? Another baseless claim? Provide proof, please. Then I will discuss it.

 

[ElChupacabra]

It's consistent with statements he's made in public and with what numerous others with access to the president have said about him. Live in denial as you wish, but there are consequences for it. This shitty part is the rest of us have to pay for you perpetually wearing your blinders. God damn right I resent it, too.

Lest we forget:

He’s not a war hero. He is a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.

 

[Cosmo]

If you read what I wrote and actually thought about it, you'll see how your response makes no sense, but perhaps "someone like you" can't comprehend the point. Nowhere did I say the story was true, I actually questioned whether it was.

Good, if so, then you're making progress, so why the petulant response?

 

[ElChupacabra]

Good, if so, then you're making progress, so why the petulant response?

None of my responses were petulant. They were addressing the completely off base remarks you were making since none of them addressed what I actually said.

 

[Showtime586]

What's this? Some clumsy leftist way of trying to shift the burden of proof?

Can you not answer a simple question without having to deflect?
I see that you are also in the group of "clueless" Trumpians that foolishly believe that all anti-Trumpers are leftists.

 

[Utility Man]

Your anonymous source is reliable because...Donald Trump?

Nope, merely pointing out that you are defending trump, and he is a known reliable (dangerous) source of misinformation.





But hey, maybe it's a coincidence that he and his supporters hate certain people......



......certainly they wouldn't degrade those who sacrifice for our country, right.....



.....especially since they care so very much about all lives, yeah.

 

[Cosmo]

None of my responses were petulant. They were addressing the completely off base remarks you were making since none of them addressed what I actually said.

This entire thread is based on a baseless claim by some "magazine." Can't you accept that? Why the need to drone on and on about magazines?

Can you not answer a simple question without having to deflect?
I see that you are also in the group of "clueless" Trumpians that foolishly believe that all anti-Trumpers are leftists.

Of course I can answer it, but why would I? It would just enable your leftist attempt to shift the burden of proof.

Nope

Good I'm glad you've abandoned trying to substantiate this baseless claim.

 

[MamboDervish]

Oh right named sources aren't a thing. Got it!

Never said that. Try again?

 

[ElChupacabra]

This entire thread is based on a baseless claim by some "magazine." Can't you accept that? Why the need to drone on and on about magazines?

You seem to struggle with the fact I never said it was true or false and made a completely different point.

Of course I can answer it, but why would I? It would just enable your leftist attempt to shift the burden of proof.

Because it's a question that would help establish your intellectual consistency. As it relates to this thread, it would determine which baseless claims you would accept and which ones you wouldn't.

Good I'm glad you've abandoned trying to substantiate this baseless claim.

Since I don't know whether it's true or not I leave it at that, but that wasn't my point.

 

[Cosmo]

Never said that. Try again?

What else does "People are only willing to speak under confidentiality agreements" mean?

You seem to struggle with the fact I never said it was true or false and made a completely different point.


Because it's a question that would help establish your intellectual consistency. As it relates to this thread, it would determine which baseless claims you would accept and which ones you wouldn't.

Notice how the left, when exposed as basing their entire thread on a baseless anonymous claim, immediately moves towards character assassination.

Since I don't know whether it's true or not I leave it at that, but that wasn't my point.

 

[ClaraD]

What does this have to do with the discussion?

Oh OK so nothing to do with the "suckers and losers" line of argument pushed by the leftists here.

He called her a ****ing Mexican. Do you agree with him?

 

[ClaraD]

Where is this offer? Where is the refusal? Let's get some facts first.

He did it publicly. The parents said he hasn’t paid it. Are you calling her parents liars?

 

[dockside]

Why doesn't The Atlantic cite its supposed sources?

If you knew anything about journalism ethics, you wouldn't have to ask this question. Unless the source give permission to the journalist to cite his name, the journalist must keep it confidential. That's because, if you haven't been able to figure it out, if a journalist revealed the source of some information which might make the source a target, there would be far fewer people with information who would talk to a journalist. Think "Watergate" and "Deep Throat" as good examples. Nixon or his cronies would not have hesitated to make life miserable for Deep Throat if they had known his identity. With the violence which appears to be permissible now, it would be even worse for whistleblowers or other knowledgeable sources.

 

[Cosmo]

He called her a ****ing Mexican. Do you agree with him?

He did it publicly. The parents said he hasn’t paid it. Are you calling her parents liars?

If he did it publicly just post the video.

If you knew anything about journalism ethics, you wouldn't have to ask this question. Unless the source give permission to the journalist to cite his name, the journalist must keep it confidential. That's because, if you haven't been able to figure it out, if a journalist revealed the source of some information which might make the source a target, there would be far fewer people with information who would talk to a journalist. Think "Watergate" and "Deep Throat" as good examples. Nixon or his cronies would not have hesitated to make life miserable for Deep Throat if they had known his identity. With the violence which appears to be permissible now, it would be even worse for whistleblowers or other knowledgeable sources.

What violence is "permissible now?" What are you talking about?