• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:241]Trump Was Enraged by Funeral Cost for ‘F–king Mexican’ U.S. Soldier: Report

Questerr

Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 28, 2019
Messages
55,218
Reaction score
38,605
Location
San Antonio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
More absolute contempt Trump has for the military and servicemembers. Dismisses a dead US soldier as “a ****ing Mexican” and refuses to pay for her funeral after telling her family that he would, and later he laments not having “the kind of generals Hitler did”. He really wants to be a dictator.

 
And this is all anyone needs to know:

When informed that the total costs amounted to $60,000, Trump was incensed. “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a ****ing Mexican!” he reportedly told his then Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. “Don’t pay it!”

Trump reportedly complained later in the day that these “****ing people” are “trying to rip me off.”
 
With the "suckers and losers" comment and the "I like people who don't get captured" (when talking about McCain being shot down in enemy territory).
Oh wow I didn't realize Vanessa was captured. Where was she held as a POW?
 
According to contemporaneous notes and interviews obtained by The Atlantic
Oh wow sounds reliable!

It is:

Overall, we rate The Atlantic Left-Center Biased due to editorial positions and High for factual reporting based on excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact-check record.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Credibility Rating: HIGH
 
According to contemporaneous notes and interviews obtained by The Atlantic


It is:

Overall, we rate The Atlantic Left-Center Biased due to editorial positions and High for factual reporting based on excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact-check record.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Credibility Rating: HIGH
Why doesn't The Atlantic cite its supposed sources?
 
More absolute contempt Trump has for the military and servicemembers. Dismisses a dead US soldier as “a ****ing Mexican” and refuses to pay for her funeral after telling her family that he would, and later he laments not having “the kind of generals Hitler did”. He really wants to be a dictator.

His cult simply doesn't care.
 
Why doesn't The Atlantic cite its supposed sources?
I guess you don't understand how journalism works, do'ya? People are only willing to speak under confidentiality agreements. Without those, no insiders would risk the retribution of exposure. But rest assured, investigative reporting is only published when backed by sufficient corroboration.

Watch the movie, "All The President's Men" for some insights into the process.
 
Why doesn't The Atlantic cite its supposed sources?
Because it doesn't have to. It's a credible source.

Back to the discussion. This is from The Atlantic:


...Guillén, the daughter of Mexican immigrants, grew up in Houston, and her murder sparked outrage across Texas and beyond. Fort Hood had become known as a particularly perilous assignment for female soldiers, and members of Congress took up the cause of reform. Shortly after her remains were discovered, President Donald Trump himself invited the Guillén family to the White House. With Guillén’s mother seated beside him, Trump spent 25 minutes with the family as television cameras recorded the scene.

In the meeting, Trump maintained a dignified posture and expressed sympathy to Guillén’s mother. “I saw what happened to your daughter Vanessa, who was a spectacular person, and respected and loved by everybody, including in the military,” Trump said. Later in the conversation, he made a promise: “If I can help you out with the funeral, I’ll help—I’ll help you with that,” he said. “I’ll help you out. Financially, I’ll help you.”

Natalie Khawam, the family’s attorney, responded, “I think the military will be paying—taking care of it.” Trump replied, “Good. They’ll do a military. That’s good. If you need help, I’ll help you out.” Later, a reporter covering the meeting asked Trump, “Have you offered to do that for other families before?” Trump responded, “I have. I have. Personally. I have to do it personally. I can’t do it through government.” The reporter then asked: “So you’ve written checks to help for other families before this?” Trump turned to the family, still present, and said, “I have, I have, because some families need help … Maybe you don’t need help, from a financial standpoint. I have no idea what—I just think it’s a horrific thing that happened. And if you did need help, I’m going to—I’ll be there to help you.”...

`````````````````````````

There's no doubt trump promised to provide money to pay for the funeral.
 
Back
Top Bottom