- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 36,429
- Reaction score
- 27,026
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Do you know how many infants worldwide have Hepatitis B? Hint: It is in the millions.
So what diseases don't threaten them?
Do you know how many infants worldwide have Hepatitis B? Hint: It is in the millions.Kids should not be vaccinated against a disease that is of no real risk to them…or should we automatically vaccinate kids against all transmissible diseases?
Yes, there is. Cloth masks are not as effective as surgical masks or N95 respirators, and should not be used by health care workers, but they are useful.There is no proof non virus masks stop or slow the spread of viruses.
Hello? Slowing the spread is the whole point.Social distancing slows the spread…it can not stop it because ultimately people want to mix with other people…it simply delays the inevitable.
sighMasks had no or very little role to play in stopping the spread of the virus…mask wearers died ffs. Young people rarely got sick…but it’s obvious that older , ill people, that were at risk from Covid should have kept away from younger people unless they were willing to take the risk of infection.
Kids don’t die of Covid unless they are already seriously ill… vaccinating them to protect old folks ( vaccination is no guarantee of stopping infection btw) is clearly immoral to everyone apart from leftists.Need to see the whole article but he say MAY be not IS in your quote
Edit seems he is in the minority
Scientists condemn 'dangerous' claims children are better off catching Covid naturally than having vaccine
Experts told i there is a huge health risk to implementing herd immunity for young people and the risk associated with not vaccinating them is far greaterinews.co.uk
As usual , you are wrong…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8391141/Did-UKs-coronavirus-crisis-peak-lockdown.html
There is no proof non virus masks stop or slow the spread of viruses. If you are going to call me a liar for saying that ( which you would not to my face) at least have the backbone to link to proof of the contrary.
Social distancing slows the spread…it can not stop it because ultimately people want to mix with other people…it simply delays the inevitable. Masks had no or very little role to play in stopping the spread of the virus…mask wearers died ffs. Young people rarely got sick…but it’s obvious that older , ill people, that were at risk from Covid should have kept away from younger people unless they were willing to take the risk of infection.
Vaccinating kids that are not at risk from a disease…especially when vaccination does not prevent infection , is sick.Do you know how many infants worldwide have Hepatitis B? Hint: It is in the millions.
So what diseases don't threaten them?
You seem confused on the science and on moralityKids don’t die of Covid unless they are already seriously ill… vaccinating them to protect old folks ( vaccination is no guarantee of stopping infection btw) is clearly immoral to everyone apart from leftists.
You’re wrong..latest evidence suggests people wearing masks are more at risk…probably because they feel safe and take more risks.Per your link.... MAY HAVE BEEN.
AND....
You are lying IRT masks. While not perfect they help stem the spread from infected to uninfected. Link after link, study after study have been presented.
But feel free to keep bleating your mantras.....
You are a leftist so have absolutely no idea about science or morality….you politicise both which obviously indicates low intelligence and immorality.You seem confused on the science and on morality
I am not a leftist.You are a leftist so have absolutely no idea about science or morality….you politicise both which obviously indicates low intelligence and immorality.
You’re wrong..latest evidence suggests people wearing masks are more at risk…probably because they feel safe and take more risks.
Stop keep calling me a liar or I‘ll start calling you a retard.
Vaccinating kids that are not at risk from a disease…especially when vaccination does not prevent infection , is sick.
I am not a leftist.
You remain confused on science and morality
You’re wrong..latest evidence suggests people wearing masks are more at risk…probably because they feel safe and take more risks.
Stop keep calling me a liar or I‘ll start calling you a retard.
There is nothing confusing about the fact that vaccinating children who are not at risk from Covid for a tiny risk to adults is sick. You seem big on moral bankruptcy.You seem confused on the science and on morality
You write some pretty retarded stuff…probably due to your utter cowardice with regard to Covid…you’d probably vaccinate your own grandkids in case of a small risk to yourself. I never lie…here’s is proof mask wearing leads to greater infection…Some studies say colloidal silver is a cure all. I'll go with the experts on the mask thing.
Oh, and "they feel safe and take more risks" isn't an indication masks don't work.
Fire away triggered one.
And I haven't called you a liar. I have pointed where you have repeated lies.
What a retarded thing to write…it is clear to everyone but retards that children are at no serious risk from Covid…so to inject them to save your own skin from a tiny risk is sick…Thinking you know something that physicians and public health experts don't know is not just sick, it's stupid. For one, in regards to Covid, you have to be 12 or older to be vaccinated. Secondly, unless you are a physician or have a doctorate in virology, you need to defer public health decisions to those that do have that education and training.
You write some pretty retarded stuff…
probably due to your utter cowardice with regard to Covid…
you’d probably vaccinate your own grandkids in case of a small risk to yourself.
I never lie…
here’s is proof mask wearing leads to greater infection…
https://scitechdaily.com/surprising...e-infected-with-covid-19-than-those-who-dont/
There is nothing confusing about the fact that vaccinating children who are not at risk from Covid for a tiny risk to adults is sick. You seem big on moral bankruptcy.
What a retarded thing to write…it is clear to everyone but retards that children are at no serious risk from Covid…so to inject them to save your own skin from a tiny risk is sick…
Retards trust authority…
https://www.history.com/news/the-infamous-40-year-tuskegee-study
Yeah you are definitely confused about science and moralityThere is nothing confusing about the fact that vaccinating children who are not at risk from Covid for a tiny risk to adults is sick. You seem big on moral bankruptcy.
It doesn't scare me at all...it's just obvious they don't need vaccination from a disease that does them no harm. Also vaccination does not necessarily stop transmission. Leave those the kids alone as Pink Floyd once said.Vaccinating children scares you?
Why?
Anything that is a serious risk to kids should be vaccinated against...Covid ain't one of them...it's basically no risk and catching it provides better protection than vaccination for most kids.FFS, vaccine isn't syphilis. Nor were the studies anything like COVID treatment.
What a stupid, stupid thing to inject.
Vaccines brought about eradication or control of Polio, Tetanus, Rubella, Whooping Cough, etc.
How stand you on vaccinating children for them?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?