Grokmaster
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,613
- Reaction score
- 2,735
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
More of the LYING ASS DOUBLE TALK from the **** TALKING LEFT, as Pres.Trump seeks to replace Gen.Mattis, for their policy differences...declared a "CRISIS FOR OUR DEMOCRACY"....and "PROOF OF HOW WEAK TRUMP HAS MADE AMERICA"....by the same LYING ASS LEFT who IGNORED Obama's going through FOUR SECRETRIES OF DEFENSE, ALL OF WHOM WHE WERE CRITICAL OF HIS LACK OF LEADERSHIP (balls) in DEFENSE MATTERS.
A "little reminder" for the Hypocrisy as a Lifestyle Choice left....
Obama on the defense again as another defense secretary speaks
President Obama has not had an easy time with his secretaries of defense.
Two of his defense secretaries wrote books critical of his administration after they left office, and his third was essentially fired. On Tuesday, the White House scrambled to clarify remarks by Obama’s fourth defense secretary, Ashton B. Carter, who said over the weekend that Iraqi forces who collapsed in their defense of Ramadi lacked the “will to fight” Islamic State militants.
Carter’s pronouncement, unusual for its bluntness, angered senior Iraqi officials in Baghdad and seemed to suggest that the president’s strategy, built around supporting Iraqi forces with training and airstrikes, was failing. “Airstrikes are effective, but neither they nor really anything we do can substitute for the Iraqi forces’ will to fight,” Carter said in an interview with CNN. He added that the Iraqi government force, which “vastly outnumbered” the Islamic State attackers, simply refused to fight in Ramadi.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...7b4e9a8f7ac_story.html?utm_term=.edc306b89c22
"Yeah, but!!!!! Obama!"
Have you even read what Mattis wrote? Do you have any idea what the repercussions are of this?
No, you don't.
Keep slurping up the Kool-ade.
Obama inherited his first SECDEF, two left on good terms, and one was fired for incompetence.
None resigned because they lost faith (if there was any to begin with) in the president’s competence.
Oh look!! Beefart with an attack on me, ( living rent-free inside his head) , again...
Yes, I read Mattis' letter; they DISAGREED on some policy issues. Obama went through FOUR Sec's of DEFENSE two of whom WROTE BOOKS RIPPING HIS BALL-LESS FECKLESS NON-LEADERSHIP.
Where was the "CRISIS TO OUR DEMOCRACY" then, HYPOCRITE?
Can the OP remind us which of Obama's SecDefs resigned specifically over policy?
Nope, just attacking your moronic post.
Who the hell cares about Obama's secretaries (over an 8 year period)? Focus on the disaster that is Mattis essentially warning us that Individual 1 is a nutcase, you can do that....come on...focus.
More of the LYING ASS DOUBLE TALK from the **** TALKING LEFT, as Pres.Trump seeks to replace Gen.Mattis, for their policy differences...declared a "CRISIS FOR OUR DEMOCRACY"....and "PROOF OF HOW WEAK TRUMP HAS MADE AMERICA"....by the same LYING ASS LEFT who IGNORED Obama's going through FOUR SECRETRIES OF DEFENSE, ALL OF WHOM WHE WERE CRITICAL OF HIS LACK OF LEADERSHIP (balls) in DEFENSE MATTERS.
A "little reminder" for the Hypocrisy as a Lifestyle Choice left....
Obama on the defense again as another defense secretary speaks
President Obama has not had an easy time with his secretaries of defense.
Two of his defense secretaries wrote books critical of his administration after they left office, and his third was essentially fired. On Tuesday, the White House scrambled to clarify remarks by Obama’s fourth defense secretary, Ashton B. Carter, who said over the weekend that Iraqi forces who collapsed in their defense of Ramadi lacked the “will to fight” Islamic State militants.
Carter’s pronouncement, unusual for its bluntness, angered senior Iraqi officials in Baghdad and seemed to suggest that the president’s strategy, built around supporting Iraqi forces with training and airstrikes, was failing. “Airstrikes are effective, but neither they nor really anything we do can substitute for the Iraqi forces’ will to fight,” Carter said in an interview with CNN. He added that the Iraqi government force, which “vastly outnumbered” the Islamic State attackers, simply refused to fight in Ramadi.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...7b4e9a8f7ac_story.html?utm_term=.edc306b89c22
Don't try to confuse him with facts and context, he is too busy being on the daily angry RAGE!
More of the LYING ASS DOUBLE TALK from the **** TALKING LEFT, as Pres.Trump seeks to replace Gen.Mattis, for their policy differences...declared a "CRISIS FOR OUR DEMOCRACY"....and "PROOF OF HOW WEAK TRUMP HAS MADE AMERICA"....by the same LYING ASS LEFT who IGNORED Obama's going through FOUR SECRETRIES OF DEFENSE, ALL OF WHOM WHE WERE CRITICAL OF HIS LACK OF LEADERSHIP (balls) in DEFENSE MATTERS.
A "little reminder" for the Hypocrisy as a Lifestyle Choice left....
Obama on the defense again as another defense secretary speaks
President Obama has not had an easy time with his secretaries of defense.
Two of his defense secretaries wrote books critical of his administration after they left office, and his third was essentially fired. On Tuesday, the White House scrambled to clarify remarks by Obama’s fourth defense secretary, Ashton B. Carter, who said over the weekend that Iraqi forces who collapsed in their defense of Ramadi lacked the “will to fight” Islamic State militants.
Carter’s pronouncement, unusual for its bluntness, angered senior Iraqi officials in Baghdad and seemed to suggest that the president’s strategy, built around supporting Iraqi forces with training and airstrikes, was failing. “Airstrikes are effective, but neither they nor really anything we do can substitute for the Iraqi forces’ will to fight,” Carter said in an interview with CNN. He added that the Iraqi government force, which “vastly outnumbered” the Islamic State attackers, simply refused to fight in Ramadi.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...7b4e9a8f7ac_story.html?utm_term=.edc306b89c22
Interesting point. However, 4 wrong doesn't make a right, right?
Oh, poor little Beefart...all in a twitter overt the EXPOSED HYPOCRISY of the **** TALKING LEFT, and now MAKING UP BULL**** about what MATTIS actually said.
Mattis said NO SUCH THING.
He said he and the President disagreed on policy matters...which is why the President asked him to step down as well he should have.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/mattis-saw-coming-msnbc-conservative-says-defense-secretarys-departure-sends-chilling-message/Conservative pundit Bill Kristol told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that the retirement of Defense Secretary James Mattis sends a “chilling” message about the decision-making process inside the White House.
The retired U.S. Marine Corps general sent a strong rebuke of President Donald Trump and his foreign policy in his letter announcing his decision to leave the administration, and Kristol said the departure was a big deal.
“It so dwarfs everything else that’s happening right now,” Kristol said.
Kristol said the Mattis retirement came as a surprise to the military and the secretary’s own friends, even after Trump made the unexpected decision to remove U.S. troops from Syria.
“I spoke with a retired general just a couple days ago who is close to Mattis and discreet about his conversations with Mattis, but has been in touch with Mattis throughout,” Kristol said. “He said he’s going to hang in there, Jim really thinks it’s important for the country. Jim doesn’t have a big ego, but he thinks he’s there, he think he’s doing good. He will take a lot of blows and hang in there to prevent worse things from happening.”
Kristol said his decision to retire shows that he no longer believes he can do good inside the White House.
“For me the resignation is so important because it’s not simply that he’s disgusted about the Syria decision or disappointed by it, though he is, or even appalled by it,” he said. “This means that Mattis thought he could not stop a lot of other bad decisions from happening down the road.”
Don't try to confuse him with facts and context, he is too busy being on the daily angry RAGE!
You know, for someone who thinks he’s on the winning side of the argument, you are wound tighter than a fruit roll up.
Oh yes...anyone exposing the Left's duplicitous BULL**** , must be "raging".
Perhaps the TWO who wrote the books CRITICIZING Obama's defense policies disagreed with him on policy...ya think...since we're CITING FACTS.
We see who is CONFUSED.
This person should be ignored here. Just ranting to rile up people on DP. Not worth the effort to respond. IMO
This person should be ignored here. Just ranting to rile up people on DP. Not worth the effort to respond. IMO
Yes, you are raging, and screaming and yelling. And, as usual, you are embarrassing yourself like with your "entrapment" rage thread and all the other word salad screamfests.
Start enjoying Christmas.
View attachment 67246442
No...you are desperately RUNNING from the OP topic, as usual. Now go cry to the mods....again.
This person should be ignored here. Just ranting to rile up people on DP. Not worth the effort to respond. IMO
Moderator's Warning: |
No...you are desperately RUNNING from the OP topic, as usual. Now go cry to the mods....again.
Please provide excerpts from the books you claim ripped Obama (the guy who got Bin Laden) to shreds. As your perception of facts/reality differs greatly from most peoples, evidence is required.Oh really? That would explain their writing books RIPPING former president Mommy Pants to SHREDS over his ball-less lack of leadership in defense matters.
That’s more your thing.Feel free to keep making up whatever you need to believe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?