[W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

[Fishking]

...while touting the virtues of his ****ed up Quiver Filling religion. Why do you deny that?

Yes...he didn't say anything about his Quiver Full stuff in that post. I do think that belief system is problematic that creates unhealthy dynamics. Women are more than breeders, kids are more than a number.

 

[MaryP]

I didn't realize the law was so harsh about having child porn on your computer. No bail?
They're going to try to keep him from having contact with his seven kids. Were some of the pics his kids?

 

[Demon]

A starting point: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiverfull

Oh my, very informative, and yes - creepy. Thanks for the link, and I may do some more looking into that...

 

[Demon]

Was he the guy who blamed victims for their rapes or the one saying it was OK to rape a wife? Maybe it was both.

I do remember someone saying there was nu such thing as marital rape. Not sure which one said it though.

And.....I see @Questerr answered that!

 

[Demon]

I grew up in an immigrant catholic community where nearly every family was five-kids strong. Funny thing is. None of them were ten-kids strong. Nature seemed to always end the run at six or so. These Quiver idiots are going out of their way to reach into the teens.

And it looks like teens might not be young enough. At least for Josh.

 

[SkyFox76]

I didn't realize the law was so harsh about having child porn on your computer. No bail?
They're going to try to keep him from having contact with his seven kids. Were some of the pics his kids?

Well if he gets bail he'll be living somewhere without kids. As it should be.

From the court document:

Duggar allegedly possessed this material, some of which depicts the sexual abuse of children under the age of 12.

His wife better start thinking about the kids she's got and this being his second issue with minors. Maybe daddy will send him to imaginary therapy again.

 

[Luce]

A starting point: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiverfull

That's awesome. They're basically saying "Our omnipotent god can be thwarted by a piece of latex."

 

[JMB802]

I didn't realize the law was so harsh about having child porn on your computer. No bail?
They're going to try to keep him from having contact with his seven kids. Were some of the pics his kids?

I doubt his kids, I think the ultra-religious hypocrites are very good at compartmentalizing. Although I would worry about him being around children of family and friends.

 

[SkyFox76]

Other than people who are mentally imbalanced who smirks for a mugshot? He looks like he's been on a two month binge.

 

[Demon]

Other than people who are mentally imbalanced who smirks for a mugshot? He looks like he's been on a two month binge.

View attachment 67331287

Maybe he's thinking "you caught me, but you can't erase all those child porn image goodies from my mind"

 

[MaryP]

He looks stoned.

 

[Candyman]

He looks stoned.

Either that or the photographer's kid just walked by in the background...

 

[SkyFox76]

I guess I missed some of his other stuff.

I knew about molesting two of his sisters but didn't realize there were 3 other girls. Then in the same year that got exposed, he got busted for cheating on his wife where he then admitted to having an addiction to pornography.

Like I said, his wife needs to get those kids and head as far away as she can from this loser. And his parents need to accept they played a role by the way they raise those kids. The whole thing is whacked.

 

[MaryP]

I doubt his kids, I think the ultra-religious hypocrites are very good at compartmentalizing. Although I would worry about him being around children of family and friends.

Some pedos draw the line at their own kids. He didn't do that with his own sister, though, did he?

 

[uptower]

Ignorance is not my concern.

True Dat, but let's look at it objectively.

A guy sees a thread about someone he's "never heard of" getting arrested, bothers to pop in and say "I've never heard of him" repeatedly and get into an argument about why it's important about it andkerps coming back to remind us he's "never heard of him".

Are these really the actions of someone who doesn't have a dog in the fight? Sounds more like someone who knows damn well who the guy is, that he was once a darling of the evangelical right and its "family values" and now wants to downplay an example of its hypocrisy.

 

[Luce]

I do remember someone saying there was nu such thing as marital rape. Not sure which one said it though.

And.....I see @Questerr answered that!

Mashmount, IIRC. Might have been EMN, though.

 

[Demon]

Mashmount, IIRC. Might have been EMN, though.

Odd that its so hard to place with one person, isn't it? I even thought of Robert in Freemont.

 

[MaryP]

I guess I missed some of his other stuff.

I knew about molesting two of his sisters but didn't realize there were 3 other girls. Then in the same year that got exposed, he got busted for cheating on his wife where he then admitted to having an addiction to pornography.

Like I said, his wife needs to get those kids and head as far away as she can from this loser. And his parents need to accept they played a role by the way they raise those kids. The whole thing is whacked.

She very well might not. I had a lot of these cases, and getting the mom to believe, to protect the kids, is often the hardest part. Their emotional investment in the relationship overrides all sense. Like Bastard Out of Carolina. Only creepier.

 

[Grand Mal]

Some pedos draw the line at their own kids. He didn't do that with his own sister, though, did he?

And others start with their own children. Pedophiles have to be kept away from all kids. And possessing child porn removes the presumption of innocence from the equation when protecting children from abuse is a consideration, in my opinion.

 

[MaryP]

And others start with their own children. Pedophiles have to be kept away from all kids. And possessing child porn removes the presumption of innocence from the equation when protecting children from abuse is a consideration, in my opinion.

Makes sense, I guess.

 

[Candyman]

Oh your post can **** right off. They are not a typical Christian family. They are closer to a Christian cult offshoot than anything else.

Settle down, Carole.

Typical
Sanctimonious
Christian
Family

You know, the kind of Christians that think they're so morally superior to everyone else that they can lecture everyone on how their beliefs are the only true beliefs and everyone else is going to Hell. Shit like that. Funny how fast they scramble for cover when one of their own turns out to be a straight up pedophile.

 

[JMB802]

Oh your post can **** right off. They are not a typical Christian family. They are closer to a Christian cult offshoot than anything else.

I wonder who they supported for President? hmmmm

 

[reflechissez]

I wonder who they supported for President? hmmmm

Hard to say.

 

[bomberfox]

I think when you have 20 kids the odds are pretty much stacked in favor of at least one of them being a creepy sleazeball

Arent these the quiverfull types? I remember a certain Duggar family.

 

[calamity]

True Dat, but let's look at it objectively.

A guy sees a thread about someone he's "never heard of" getting arrested, bothers to pop in and say "I've never heard of him" repeatedly and get into an argument about why it's important about it andkerps coming back to remind us he's "never heard of him".

Are these really the actions of someone who doesn't have a dog in the fight? Sounds more like someone who knows damn well who the guy is, that he was once a darling of the evangelical right and its "family values" and now wants to downplay an example of its hypocrisy.

In the age of google....yeah, I'm not buying his BS.