• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:133]Explainer-What charges could Trump face over efforts to overturn the 2020 election?

NWRatCon said:
The absolute flop-sweat desperation of some of these posts is hilarious. No sense of how trials work, how the Constitution works or applies, or how deep the trouble is. This is not complicated from a prosecution standpoint. It really isn't. I've only tried a couple, but they are a breeze. On these facts? Slam dunk. Those defenses? Irrelevant. Especially if there are cooperating witnesses.
Click to expand...

I've seen your replies from the Rittenhouse case and I'm not impressed. How could you be so wrong then, but a slam dunk in this case?
 
Linuxcooldude said:
I've seen your replies from the Rittenhouse case and I'm not impressed.
How could you be so wrong then, but a slam dunk in this case?
Click to expand...
Do you think the dotard Donald will be found "Not Guilty" on all counts...
Someone is definitely "WRONG", but it is NOT @NWRatCon ...
-Peace
1696933108056.webp​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom