• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

VP Harris mocked for being 'too scared' to do interview without Walz: 'She simply cannot be left unattended'

snakestretcher said:
CNN is broadcast in Britain, and I frequently see conservative commentators featured on discussion panels; David Urban is just one.

en.wikipedia.org

David Urban - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
Yes, there are a few but not nearly what you see with liberals on FOX. I also point out the attacks that NBC made upon the hiring of Ronna McDaniel. Yeah, those lefties have a real open and professional nature about them.
When Bill Maher starts talking about how bad teh left media and politicians have become you know it's gotten bad.
 
VySky said:
She's to afraid to do an interview by herself so she has to be supervised

And of course, the hard hitting Dana Bash will offer offer up softball questions

Its clear the Harris camp doesn't trust Kamala to go through a full hour of questions, so they are sending Walz so he can take up some of the time slot.

Oc course they have to ask him some questions which means less questions Kamala has to answer

Sorry Democrats, America can see right through this smoke screen.

=======================================

​



www.foxnews.com

VP Harris mocked for being 'too scared' to do interview without Walz: 'She simply cannot be left unattended'

Social media users called it "embarrassing" that Vice President Kamala Harris' first major interview would be done alongside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...


😴
 
Integrityrespec said:
Just laying out the history. FOX is must less biased that CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the left media. They have a mean spirited agenda and seem intent on getting to it. FOX for the most part is willing to interview anyone and everyone and keep it mostly professional. Even Sean Hannity is cordial in an interview. The left is bitter about something, maybe it's the affect of socialism and marxist tendency in their ideology. It's shameless,because those talking heads on TV aren't living the life of the common man and woman they seem to want to dictate too. They're rich and priveleged and don't have a clue as to what so many bad policies are having at the gas pump, grocery stores, and when middle america tries to purchase a home and looks at the crazy prices and mortgage rates.
Click to expand...
Ok.

I think the bias of Fox is well known at this point.
 
The AntiDonald said:
Perhaps because she's traveling and extremely busy. This is the typical MAGA playbook. Always complain and move the goal posts. Now she's doing the interview that you all have been railing on her about, but now it's not at the right time.

Is there anything that MAGA won't cry about?
Click to expand...
No goal posts have been moved? I never said her interview wasn’t “at the right time”? Do better
 
Integrityrespec said:
Yes, there are a few but not nearly what you see with liberals on FOX. I also point out the attacks that NBC made upon the hiring of Ronna McDaniel. Yeah, those lefties have a real open and professional nature about them.
When Bill Maher starts talking about how bad teh left media and politicians have become you know it's gotten bad.
Click to expand...
So what are you complaining about then? Considering McDaniel was chair of the RNC, her hiring merely serves to underline Fox's political bias. 'Fair and balanced'? Hardly.
 
VySky said:
Walz is going to get some of the time that we would rather see applied to Kamala

Problem is, she doesn't have an hour worth of answers, and to be fair, Dana doesn't have enough questions to ask that would make a beneficial 1-hour interview with Kamala

That is because no one knows what she stands for.
Click to expand...
Appreciate your faux concern about Kamala and Walz.
Shouldn't you be attending a Vance "rally". You might get him to 20 attendees :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Airyaman said:
When Trump first picked Vance, they did some mutual interviews. After that, it seems they don't like each other much anymore so Vance does separate events and interviews and gets to look awkward ordering food for his crowds of 10-20 people.
Click to expand...
I mean, when your VP candidate called you "Hitler", its awkward for both of them to be on the same stage.
 
VySky said:
You're kidding right?

Walz is taking away time from Harris we have been waiting for.

Of course Dana is going to ask him stupid VP type questions that most of us prefer were more important questions asked of Kamala.

It's clear as mud why they are doing this.
Click to expand...
I can smell the sweat on your posts. Chill, dude. 🤡
 
VySky said:
No, you should be concerned why they are sending Walz so Kamala doesn't have to answer so many questions she doesn't want to answer, or doesn't know the answer to.
Click to expand...
She needs a man with her to take the "tough" questions from CNN.
 
Perhaps Walz is appearing with her to help placate viewers who are afraid of a black woman being president.
 
NatMorton said:
Just a little reminder about where CNN's Dana Bash's sympathies may lie. From the June debate, about the only plausible explanation for her hand gestures at this moment was her signaling to a confused President Biden that he should be looking at Jake Tapper since he was the one asking Biden a question.

Click to expand...

Tell us exactly why we should be worried about this story. Biden is out. Harris is in. Harris is rapidly catching Trump and, in some places, passing him...

No one cares about your outdated, irrelevant history lesson.
 
NatMorton said:
Viewed cynically, it's a good strategy. Harris is not known for thinking quickly on her feet (or even on her ass). From what little I've seen from Walz he seems very good off the cuff.

Get ready for Tim to but in every time it sounds like a cackle might be welling up.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think he could be a big help in "saving" her. It's a great (and maybe necessary) strategy for her. This time, they can pull it off to because it's not unusual for VPs to be in first interviews but if he's in her next one (if there is one), then it will become a deserved joke about her inability and unwillingness to function without help.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Yes, there are a few but not nearly what you see with liberals on FOX. I also point out the attacks that NBC made upon the hiring of Ronna McDaniel. Yeah, those lefties have a real open and professional nature about them.
When Bill Maher starts talking about how bad teh left media and politicians have become you know it's gotten bad.
Click to expand...
This is you about the NBC McDaniel story.

1724855696365.webp

All the hosts objected to her because she was an outspoken election denier. In short, she's a Trump liar. They don't want that on their air.
 
The AntiDonald said:
Tell us exactly why we should be worried about this story. Biden is out. Harris is in. Harris is rapidly catching Trump and, in some places, passing him...

No one cares about your outdated, irrelevant history lesson.
Click to expand...
Would this "history" be more relevant if it were evidence the host of the upcoming debate were biased in favor of Trump?
 
NatMorton said:
Would this "history" be more relevant if it were evidence the host of the upcoming debate were biased in favor of Trump?
Click to expand...
Not to me it wouldn't. All this crap is just noise to me. I can't wait until this election is over.

In fact, I would fully expect a Trump biased host to send him smoke signals. We see it every time he does an interview with a MAGA friendly host. They give him softball questions and he still goes off script.
 
The AntiDonald said:
Frankly, I'm voting for a team. A team that works together. However they decide to do their interviews is fine with me.

For once, be honest. If Harris gave the longest, most substantive interview of any presidential candidate, would you change your vote?
We already know the answer to this.
Click to expand...

Then why are you asking the question?
 
Why are Kamala Harris and Tim Walz running from Kamala Harris' previous far left policies? Even more so, why are lefties, like the go greeners, the environmentalists not questioning her about the sudden change on her policies?
 
Integrityrespec said:
Yes, there are a few but not nearly what you see with liberals on FOX. I also point out the attacks that NBC made upon the hiring of Ronna McDaniel. Yeah, those lefties have a real open and professional nature about them.
When Bill Maher starts talking about how bad teh left media and politicians have become you know it's gotten bad.
Click to expand...

A news organization would compromise its integrity by hiring an election denier.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Why are Kamala Harris and Tim Walz running from Kamala Harris' previous far left policies? Even more so, why are lefties, like the go greeners, the environmentalists not questioning her about the sudden change on her policies?
Click to expand...

It's quite common to run to the right or left in primaries and then move to the middle in general elections.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom