• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Vote to Censure Bush to be Introduced in Senate

Gee, I'm shocked. Imagine, politicians playing politics.

To quote Willie Wonka (the first film iteration), "Don't. Wait. Stop."
 
I like to quote movies so I'm going to quote Bill Murray in Ghostbusters,
"I'm a little fuzzy on this whole good bad thing."


Dictionary.com defines censure as "An official rebuke, as by a
legislature of one of its members."

Using the literal translation, Congress holds no right of censure over
the President. Why? Because there is no reciprocal right of censure
for the President. The President can censure one of his staff or his
cabinet. The Congress can censure one of it's members. The Judicial
Branch could, could mind you, censure one of it's members. The Congress
can not censure the President of the United States.

Where are these rules of censure written? If it is mere political posturing
which means little or nothing, then why waste precious time?

I'm having a heckuva time trying to find any rules regarding a "right
of censure" held by Congress over the President.
 
XShipRider said:
I like to quote movies so I'm going to quote Bill Murray in Ghostbusters,
"I'm a little fuzzy on this whole good bad thing."


Dictionary.com defines censure as "An official rebuke, as by a
legislature of one of its members."

Using the literal translation, Congress holds no right of censure over
the President. Why? Because there is no reciprocal right of censure
for the President. The President can censure one of his staff or his
cabinet. The Congress can censure one of it's members. The Judicial
Branch could, could mind you, censure one of it's members. The Congress
can not censure the President of the United States.

Where are these rules of censure written? If it is mere political posturing
which means little or nothing, then why waste precious time?

I'm having a heckuva time trying to find any rules regarding a "right
of censure" held by Congress over the President.
Although censure is not defined in the Constitution, the Constitution itself does give Congress the right to set its rules. Censure was used once before, on Andrew Jackson. Also, there is nothing really to prevent the executive branch from issuing a censure of a member of Congress. It has never been done before, thats all. Doesnt mean a president couldnt set a precedent and just do it. :)
 
danarhea said:
Although censure is not defined in the Constitution, the Constitution itself does give Congress the right to set its rules. Censure was used once before, on Andrew Jackson. Also, there is nothing really to prevent the executive branch from issuing a censure of a member of Congress. It has never been done before, thats all. Doesnt mean a president couldnt set a precedent and just do it. :)

I agree there is nothing to stop the President from issuing a letter of
censure. What is the point to the practice if it means nothing, holds
no weight, has zero implications?

I'm going to guess -- politics.
 
Back
Top Bottom