• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Uzbekistan addressed a problem of ‘incorrect’ delimitation!

B

boom

New member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Look, last time you can tumble in Central Asia Mass Media the clearance policy – the theme of artificial boundary marked in Soviet Union era in this region. Uzbek representatives think that Tashkent is most injured of it. They say that some part of historical territories are part of modern Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. More interesting that Tashkent supposes that Kirghizia and Tajikistan are artificial countries that were created by curtailment squares of neighboring countries! By this way Uzbekistan lays territorial claims to all republics of Central Asia. In truth the tense atmosphere in Kirghizia provoked these moods.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom