- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 25,357
- Reaction score
- 11,557
- Location
- Post-Trump America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
“A president who would all but call Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand a whore is not fit to clean the toilets in the Barack Obama Presidential Library or to shine the shoes of George W. Bush,” USA Today explained.
What's with the W. love? That dude was a monster.
I'm just going to put this here. This is how I've felt about Trump from the start:
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tr...y-editorial-blistered-our-unstable-president/
My 2018 Trump gone prediction is looking ever closer to reality.
Democrats say Trump's tweets about Sen. Gillibrand are sexist, crude - Chicago TribuneLightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
No more of a monster than Obama, maybe less so.
Here is the Trump tweet:
Democrats say Trump's tweets about Sen. Gillibrand are sexist, crude - Chicago Tribune
Does anyone see the word "whore" (slut, prostitute, etc.) anywhere in that tweet?
I'm certain I've seen that kind of language used before against people of all political persuasions by opponents labeling anyone who will do anything to get their agenda accomplished.
Of course, leave it to the anti-Trump elements to push the "sexist" angle...since the "collusion" angle isn't going all that well. :coffeepap:
Come on. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows EXACTLY what he meant. You choose to put your head in the sand is your problem.
Here is the Trump tweet:
Democrats say Trump's tweets about Sen. Gillibrand are sexist, crude - Chicago Tribune
Does anyone see the word "whore" (slut, prostitute, etc.) anywhere in that tweet?
I'm certain I've seen that kind of language used before against people of all political persuasions by opponents labeling anyone who will do anything to get their agenda accomplished.
Of course, leave it to the anti-Trump elements to push the "sexist" angle...since the "collusion" angle isn't going all that well.
The "impeach him by any means necessary" activism is in full swing. :coffeepap:
We get it, the media hates Trump. Is this just going to continue to be the "Media Hate Trump Olympics" where they compete to show how much blatant bias they have?
I'm just going to put this here. This is how I've felt about Trump from the start:
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tr...y-editorial-blistered-our-unstable-president/
My 2018 Trump gone prediction is looking ever closer to reality.
We get it, the media hates Trump. Is this just going to continue to be the "Media Hate Trump Olympics" where they compete to show how much blatant bias they have?
I'm just going to put this here. This is how I've felt about Trump from the start:
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tr...y-editorial-blistered-our-unstable-president/
My 2018 Trump gone prediction is looking ever closer to reality.
What's with the W. love? That dude was a monster.
What's with the W. love? That dude was a monster.
Come on. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows EXACTLY what he meant. You choose to put your head in the sand is your problem.
I'm just going to put this here. This is how I've felt about Trump from the start:
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tr...y-editorial-blistered-our-unstable-president/
My 2018 Trump gone prediction is looking ever closer to reality.
W had a good heart.
He was just dumber than a sledload of ****.
No, people with a clear political bias will see what they want to see.
I see a standard political slam that has been around in one form or another since I was a kid, used against both male and female politicians.
Not something that is especially "sexist" when used against a woman. :shrug:
How many of us have said much the same thing about various government officials (and brown-nosing co-workers) over the years? :coffeepap:
P.S.:
I am amazed by the hypocritical outrage displayed by people (some in this Forum) who have no problem calling political opponents every dirty name in the book in blatant ad hominin attacks; but claim the moral high ground at the slightest use of such tactics...targeting their "allies." :roll:
I'm just going to put this here. This is how I've felt about Trump from the start:
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tr...y-editorial-blistered-our-unstable-president/
My 2018 Trump gone prediction is looking ever closer to reality.
I'm just going to put this here. This is how I've felt about Trump from the start:
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tr...y-editorial-blistered-our-unstable-president/
My 2018 Trump gone prediction is looking ever closer to reality.
The Loony-Tune, left-wing USA Today ALWAYS torches Trump. So what's new?
Just another day with the liberal snowflakes and their like-minded cohorts getting their panties in a bunch.
What's with the W. love? That dude was a monster.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?