- Joined
- Aug 24, 2013
- Messages
- 14,803
- Reaction score
- 11,542
- Location
- Red Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
We agree. It's our president and secretary of state you need to be telling this to, not us.I will ask USA, Please stop disturbing other country. Think about your country's issues, which concerns me more than interfering to other countries political which obliviously make situation worse than before.
As soon as we have AlQ and AlN in charge of Syria, our plan (dividing up Turkey) will be put into action.
We agree. It's our president and secretary of state you need to be telling this to, not us.
We agree, but you need to tell that to them too - because they're not listening to us.I totally agree with you. But dont forgot, its you people who elected your president. So you people have power to change the fate of your country. am I wrong
I totally agree with you. But dont forgot, its you people who elected your president. So you people have power to change the fate of your country. am I wrong
We couldn't stop Bush from attacking Iraq. What makes you think we can stop Obama from attacking Syria?
We agree, but you need to tell that to them too - because they're not listening to us.
I totally agree with you. But dont forgot, its you people who elected your president. So you people have power to change the fate of your country. am I wrong
We agree, but you need to tell that to them too - because they're not listening to us.
Actually don't agree. We may agree that the timing of Obama is terrible and he's made the situation worse, but we should "disturb" other countries if it's in our national interest.
What is the national interest, and what is the endgame of any attack? What defines success?
I didn't say I'm for an attack, but I'm not going to agree with someone that says we should not disturb other countries generally. That's ridiculous.
What is the national interest, and what is the endgame of any attack? What defines success?
I didn't say I'm for an attack, but I'm not going to agree with someone that says we should not disturb other countries generally. That's ridiculous.
I just asked some simple questions as what would be accomplished...
Why is it "ridiculous" to suggest the USofA should stay out of other countries business????
What "right" do we have to stick our noses in their stuff?
You quoted me and asked irrelevant questions to my post. And I don't care to answer your questions when we probably agree on not attacking...waste of my time.
Western values are not shared by ME countries. If there is no gain to be had, I see no purpose other than galvanizing those who would already to see the west fail, which is what would happen. You should know better than anyone that the current leadership doesn't have the gonads to be effective in a strike.
Good evening 2m...
Good evening, AP.:2wave:
I have no comment on anyone's gonads. I think The Economist gets it about right.
Does anyone think that once we start, we'll not become involved in a much bigger way?
No, of course not. Why would anyone ever think that?
US plans for '3 days of attack' on Syria
I do not support this kind of action in any way, shape, or form.
Does anyone think that once we start, we'll not become involved in a much bigger way?
I see a domino effect happening here, and I don't like it one bit.
[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]
I don't get how anyone could support this kind of action. seriously, how many people actually believe that a sovereign nation woukd just allow themselves to be attacked without bringing about some sort of retribution.
that is unlesd the intention is to have Syria retaliate and use that retaliation as justification for an all out invasion. that woukd then open the door to a regiobal war that woukd engulfe iran and all surroundibg natiins as a minimum.
Stay classy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?