- Joined
- Sep 22, 2005
- Messages
- 11,430
- Reaction score
- 2,282
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
A post-issue musing:
Ironic that people with AIDS were banned yet all other contageous and highly infectuous diseases were walking free and easily spread.
This ending of the ban is just in time for all the AIDS folks to come rushing to the US for free medical care once the healthcare bill is passed into law.
That was evidence.
How about you citing a pressing need of the US to admit these diseased individuals to support your case. There's absolutely no reason the doors to the US be thrown open to everyone, so present the case of needs the commands us to accept these people.
The fact that people who aren't allowed into the US can't infect people in the US is irrefutable and sufficient to justify denying diseased people entrance.
Explain why we need to admit diseased individuals.
Exactly, you can be exposed without volunteering....
Don't look now, but you are bolstering the arguement for banning....
Your veiled disdain for the U.S. is duly noted as well.....
Why do foreigners insist on passing judgement on our internal affairs?.....
:mrgreen:
So you like building straw men.
"Teachers" aren't "academics". You would know this if you talked to them.
Lawyers aren't academics. You would know this if you were willing to admit the disservice they do to this country.
Since I've been to school, I'm perfectly aware of what the "university culture" is, and all real Americans despise that nonsense. People with no real world experience, ie, academics, should not be looked up to by people who's problems aren't what you would call "academic".
Then again, I was not an impressionable little child when I went to college, but a military service vet.
In all seriousness, how many people get infected by needle sticks while working at the hospital as opposed to the other traditional methods of injecting HIV into a person, and why should we accept the clumsy immigrants who really are infected by accidental needle jabs when we can choose non-clumsy unjabbed uninfected medical professionals instead?
i have to say i agree here, unless the person already has family members in the u.s. at least this type of disease.Because it's a good idea, is why.
Is there some reason the US should have to allow diseased people in?
I'm sorry, I didn't recall seeing a gender on your profile & thought the avatar was a little girl, not a little boy.....My bad!....... :3oops:Two things; one, I am a male hence 'her' is incorrect to refer to me by
The fact that I detected your alien roots through your posts speaks volumes......- two, I am in fact a citizen of the US and have been for some time.
I'm sorry, I didn't recall seeing a gender on your profile & thought the avatar was a little girl, not a little boy.....My bad!....... :3oops:
The fact that I detected your alien roots through your posts speaks volumes......
You haven't assimilated as much as you think.....
assimilation doesn't mean hiding your roots. and all you did was look at spelling. congratulations.=Warspite;1058466255]An argument has to be able to stand on its own before you can bolster it.
Just because I don't view the world through rose coloured glasses doesn't mean I despise the US - quite the contrary in fact.
I'm sorry, I didn't recall seeing a gender on your profile & thought the avatar was a little girl, not a little boy.....My bad!....... :3oops:
The fact that I detected your alien roots through your posts speaks volumes......
You haven't assimilated as much as you think.....
assimilation doesn't mean hiding your roots. and all you did was look at spelling. congratulations.
Actually it was this snippet that unveiled it.....WARSPIT=
I forget how America despises academics sometimes - maybe if you imported more of them you'd have a decent healthcare system or understand why banning HIV positive legal immigrants is like trying to fireproof a burning house.
In other words, you've lost the argument but aren't man enough to be honest about it.
Now you are simply being obtuse because unless you are an idiot, you know exactly what I said and what it means.You mean if I tell them that the best way to avoid getting HIV is the best way to avoid, I'm not telling them the truth? Are you suggesting that I tell them an inferior method is better?
Lost the argument? This isn't school yard tag, I didn't realize we were in a competition, I thought we were trying to get to a truth or dispute a falsehood or simply espouse our opinion. It's quite childish to approach a conversation as if it were a contest and foolish to declare yourself the winner. Your sophomoric attempt at baiting me is clear.
Senator Edwards is a good example.Au contraire.
:rofl Don't be daft - lawyers do a "disservice"? Involving onesself in the law is one of the more noble and enlightened pursuits humans have yet invented.
Certainly not the first amendment to the US ConstitutionIf it weren't for lawyers you wouldn't be able to spout off about politics as freely as you can.
My parents immigration to the US in 1955, and they didn't get all the freebies offered to illegals today. They didn't speak English either, and no one from the govt came and took pity on them. I don't consider the amnesty approach by the Dems as much of a screening.I see, so "real Americans" are uneducated hicks then? No wonder much of the Enlightened world have the opinions of the US that they do.
Bully for you?
Having immigrated to this country, I can safely say you know little to nothing about the screening people go through in order to get in legally, let alone get a green card or naturalization. :
Uh, welcome to the DEBATE Politics Forum......:roll:
I think it's a strategy that liberals use sometimes. :lol:Oh I see, so then all I have to do is keep repeating some nonsense over and over, regardless of how ignorant, false or ridiculous until no one will debate with me and then declare myself the victor? No thanks.
Now you are simply being obtuse because unless you are an idiot, you know exactly what I said and what it means.
Au contraire.
:rofl Don't be daft - lawyers do a "disservice"? Involving onesself in the law is one of the more noble and enlightened pursuits humans have yet invented.
If it weren't for lawyers you wouldn't be able to spout off about politics as freely as you can.
I see, so "real Americans" are uneducated hicks then? No wonder much of the Enlightened world have the opinions of the US that they do.
Having immigrated to this country, I can safely say you know little to nothing about the screening people go through in order to get in legally, let alone get a green card or naturalization. :
i have to say i agree here, unless the person already has family members in the u.s. at least this type of disease.
An argument has to be able to stand on its own before you can bolster it.
"Little girl"? That is Tifa Lockhart from Final Fantasy VII excuse you.
I am a world citizen, assimilation is not my goal. That said, my lack of assimilation does not entail ignorance of my country of residence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?