why don't you read your own post, #714, and apply the whole 'caustic and baiting ' thing to yourself......It would help if you were a little less caustic in your response and stop with the baiting. I do believe that i do know what would have happened without TARP, union contracts wouldn't have been bailed out, states would have had to come up with their own funding, some businesses would have failed and others would have taken them over and none of that would have been on the taxpayer dime. The fact that the largest banks were forced into TARP is quite telling
Documents Reveal How Paulson Forced Banks To Take TARP Cash - Business Insider
Now, if Obama could just get EVERYBODY to stop looking for a job, we could get the unemployment rate down to 0 percent!
People dropping out of the workforce altogether isn't the solution, folks.
Gee, thanks for that cogent analysis.
Otherwise known as the truth.
You should try it.
Otherwise known as the truth. You should try it.
Now, if Obama could just get EVERYBODY to stop looking for a job, we could get the unemployment rate down to 0 percent!
People dropping out of the workforce altogether isn't the solution, folks.
What a surprise that you left out the final statement
Either you are lying again or you're blind as a bat, I didn't leave out the final statement.
By the way, your guy Mitt Romney took it on the chin last night. Little Ricky Santorum beat the pants off him. Romney is supposed to be the most electable? :lamo
There were 257K private sector jobs created in January, you'll have to go back to March 2006 to see that many jobs created in one month.
That makes no sense at all.
That's cause we didn't need to create that many jobs years ago.
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
2002 | -151 | -159 | -65 | -96 | -80 | 12 | -95 | -56 | -12 | 108 | -14 | -170 |
2003 | 57 | -157 | -199 | -34 | 19 | -39 | -2 | 32 | 161 | 143 | 37 | 108 |
2004 | 170 | 32 | 299 | 223 | 310 | 94 | 41 | 102 | 152 | 327 | 27 | 133 |
2005 | 95 | 231 | 145 | 346 | 143 | 261 | 280 | 187 | 84 | 96 | 304 | 140 |
2006 | 315 | 285 | 258 | 165 | 7 | 80 | 158 | 145 | 86 | 5 | 189 | 166 |
2007 | 229 | 57 | 172 | 46 | 121 | 61 | -4 | -73 | 20 | 61 | 75 | 47 |
2008 | 41 | -136 | -112 | -215 | -216 | -231 | -259 | -294 | -425 | -480 | -797 | -658 |
2009 | -839 | -725 | -787 | -802 | -312 | -426 | -296 | -219 | -184 | -232 | -42 | -120 |
2010 | -40 | -27 | 141 | 193 | 84 | 92 | 92 | 128 | 115 | 196 | 134 | 140 |
2011 | 119 | 257 | 261 | 264 | 108 | 102 | 175 | 52 | 216 | 139 | 178 | 220(P) |
2012 | 257(P) | |||||||||||
P : preliminary |
That makes no sense at all.
Private Sector Jobs:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 -151 -159 -65 -96 -80 12 -95 -56 -12 108 -14 -170 2003 57 -157 -199 -34 19 -39 -2 32 161 143 37 108 2004 170 32 299 223 310 94 41 102 152 327 27 133 2005 95 231 145 346 143 261 280 187 84 96 304 140 2006 315 285 258 165 7 80 158 145 86 5 189 166 2007 229 57 172 46 121 61 -4 -73 20 61 75 47 2008 41 -136 -112 -215 -216 -231 -259 -294 -425 -480 -797 -658 2009 -839 -725 -787 -802 -312 -426 -296 -219 -184 -232 -42 -120 2010 -40 -27 141 193 84 92 92 128 115 196 134 140 2011 119 257 261 264 108 102 175 52 216 139 178 220(P) 2012 257(P) P : preliminary
GM doesn't employ three million people but what Obama did was give money to the states so they could bailout union contracts without going to the people of the state to get the money. in other words it was nothing more than a union bailout and there is no proof that any jobs were saved by TARP that couldn't have been saved by the states themselves. Obama knew that the states wouldn't do it because those union jobs were on the line and if the states had to explain that to the electorate those unions would have been forced to take major cuts
Gm had 68,500 employees, plus 5,860 G M dealerships in the U.S. on September 20, 2009,about. Chrysler Employees, 51623,plus 3,181 dealers. Each dealer has around 200 employees.
9041 total dealers combined. =1,808,200 total employees of the dealers + Gm 68,500 employees+ Chrysler 51623Employees.for a grand total of=1,928,323.
Are you telling me I couldn’t come up with a mill and change, from ALL OF THE SUPPLIERS of both of these United States car companies? :2wave:
Gm had 68,500 employees, plus 5,860 G M dealerships in the U.S. on September 20, 2009,about. Chrysler Employees, 51623,plus 3,181 dealers. Each dealer has around 200 employees.
9041 total dealers combined. =1,808,200 total employees of the dealers + Gm 68,500 employees+ Chrysler 51623Employees.for a grand total of=1,928,323.
Are you telling me I couldn’t come up with a mill and change, from ALL OF THE SUPPLIERS of both of these United States car companies? :2wave:
Where is the link to your information?That makes no sense at all. Private Sector Jobs:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 -151 -159 -65 -96 -80 12 -95 -56 -12 108 -14 -170 2003 57 -157 -199 -34 19 -39 -2 32 161 143 37 108 2004 170 32 299 223 310 94 41 102 152 327 27 133 2005 95 231 145 346 143 261 280 187 84 96 304 140 2006 315 285 258 165 7 80 158 145 86 5 189 166 2007 229 57 172 46 121 61 -4 -73 20 61 75 47 2008 41 -136 -112 -215 -216 -231 -259 -294 -425 -480 -797 -658 2009 -839 -725 -787 -802 -312 -426 -296 -219 -184 -232 -42 -120 2010 -40 -27 141 193 84 92 92 128 115 196 134 140 2011 119 257 261 264 108 102 175 52 216 139 178 220(P) 2012 257(P) P : preliminary
Yet more bad news for righties today as first time unemployment benefits fell again as the economy continues to grow.
Good news for America is bad news for Conservatives.
Where is the link to your information?
What you don't seem to understand is that "Your" president has done nothing to generate these numbers yet you take credit for them. It is sad to see someone as smart as you believe that it is the role of the Federal Govt. to grant you rights. This Progressive movement is killing us and when you finally realize it, it will be too late
I think it's cute how in your world, a Republican president isn't to blame when unemployment rises but a Democrat president is; and how a Republican president gets the credit when jobs are gained but a Democrat president doesn't. Fortunately, I'm confidnt that most folks here see right through your partisan disconnect.
By the way, how is Progressivism killing you?
Your question wasn't directed at me.
Answer: If the economy collapsed this year, will you admit that it's Obama's fault?
Here's an answer the wingnuts won't like....."It depends on what actually happens"
Here's a direct link ...There is no direct link to the information.
Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Total Private Employment - CES0500000001
Use more formatting options to get 1-Month Net Changes
How is that killing you?Progressivism is trying to create a strong central govt. contrary to the Founders vision of a SMALL central govt. where the power is vested in the states. Telling the Church what they have to do, requiring individuals to buy healthcare, social engineering and granting individual rights aren't the role of the Federal Govt. "Your" President is putting into place the European model. One of these days you are going to realize that you don't have all the answers nor does the Central Govt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?