Its amazing that you keep telling the lie that Obama added 4.6 to the debt as if he spent that much, when he actually hasn't. But you and other conservatives will keep telling it. At least we know who is dishonest. :roll:Isn't it amazing, we have heard about the "do nothing" Congress and what obstructionists Republicans are yet we get these kind of numbers. How about it Obama supporters, with a do nothing Congress and an improving economy what exactly has Obama done to generate the numbers we saw for January 2012? Do any of you have any idea what is going to happen to debt service when the interest rates are forced to be raised due to upcoming inflation?
In 3 years Obama has added 4.6 trillion to the debt which is now 15.2 trillion, 2012 projections are another 1.1 trillion so Obama will add more debt in than the entire Debt of the country up to 2006. Bush debt 4.9 trillion in 8 years, Obama 5.7 trillion in 4
Deficits have grown over 4 trillion in 3 years, what's dishonest about that?Its amazing that you keep telling the lie that Obama added 4.6 to the debt as if he spent that much, when he actually hasn't. But you and other conservatives will keep telling it. At least we know who is dishonest. :roll:
Its amazing that you keep telling the lie that Obama added 4.6 to the debt as if he spent that much, when he actually hasn't. But you and other conservatives will keep telling it. At least we know who is dishonest. :roll:
How much of that spending is due to his initiative and not Bush's? The wars, Part D etc.You're right; he's actually had three years where the spending was around $3.8T, so he's spent $11.8T.
Its amazing that you keep telling the lie that Obama added 4.6 to the debt as if he spent that much, when he actually hasn't. But you and other conservatives will keep telling it. At least we know who is dishonest. :roll:
How much of that spending is due to his initiative and not Bush's? The wars, Part D etc.
Right back atcha ... which Obama policies spent some 9 trillion since he's been in office?Isn't it amazing, we have heard about the "do nothing" Congress and what obstructionists Republicans are yet we get these kind of numbers. How about it Obama supporters, with a do nothing Congress and an improving economy what exactly has Obama done to generate the numbers we saw for January 2012? Do any of you have any idea what is going to happen to debt service when the interest rates are forced to be raised due to upcoming inflation?
In 3 years Obama has added 4.6 trillion to the debt which is now 15.2 trillion, 2012 projections are another 1.1 trillion so Obama will add more debt in than the entire Debt of the country up to 2006. Bush debt 4.9 trillion in 8 years, Obama 5.7 trillion in 4
Plus you must also consider the lost FIT revenue due to the recession.
Deficits have grown over 4 trillion in 3 years, what's dishonest about that?
Blaming Obama for 100% of it.Deficits have grown over 4 trillion in 3 years, what's dishonest about that?
Right back atcha ... which Obama policies spent some 9 trillion since he's been in office?
Blaming Obama for 100% of it.
I see, so now Obama is responsible for spending before he even became president?You're right; he's actually had three years where the spending was around $3.8T, so he's spent $11.8T.
Obama took office in January 2009 but did not set the budget for January 2009.
Obama did not cause the recession nor the drop in revenue that goes with it.
Obama did not create the bulk of our current tax and regulatory situation.
Etc.
Just looking at the change in debt from point A to point B is a foolish oversimplification of the issue.
I'm not blaming Obama for all the debt incurred, but he has done absolutely nothing to slow down spending in his 3 years. I'm simply stating facts.Obama took office in January 2009 but did not set the budget for January 2009.
Obama did not cause the recession nor the drop in revenue that goes with it.
Obama did not create the bulk of our current tax and regulatory situation.
Etc.
Just looking at the change in debt from point A to point B is a foolish oversimplification of the issue.
How much of that spending is due to his initiative and not Bush's? The wars, Part D etc.
Where is the TARP payback?
I see, so now Obama is responsible for spending before he even became president?
I'm not blaming Obama for all the debt incurred, but he has done absolutely nothing to slow down spending in his 3 years. I'm simply stating facts.
Bush signed TARP.
Got it, Bush was in office from October 1, 2008 to January 21, 2009 and added trillions to the debt in less than 4 months. Obama department heads didn't spend a dime including the stimulus, GM/Chrylser takeover, Afghanistan supplementals? That is liberal logic
No, CONGRESS has done nothing. The only thing Obama could do is veto spending bills. And much of the spending is driven by entitlements anyway.
No, he didn't say that. He asked if Obama is responsible for spending before he became president. And your constant use of ideology is ridiculous.
Yes, he did, it was a loan that has been mostly paid back. Where is that payback showing up in the 2009 deficit?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?