Why is it so difficult for people like you to understand OFFICIAL data from bea.gov, bls.gov, and Treasury.org. You call it Fox information but the reality is you have been indoctrinated so well by the radical left that you are incapable of understanding the official data and call everything propaganda from Fox
False. Other way around. You see there are lies, damn dirty lies, and then there are statistics. I fully understand that the data is factually accurate, and I know where it comes from. I'm not disputing that. However Fox is presenting these numbers completely out of context without giving you the important information that actually matters. Jobs are created under virtually all presidents, and the economy grows more often than not regardless of who is in the white house. The important question is did it grow better under Obama or Trump, and the answer to that questions is unequivocally that it grew better under Obama.
The second important question to understand is what exactly did Trump do to influence the economy? And the answer is very little. The United States Economy is a massive entity that is largely self sustaining. There is almost nothing that a president could do which would cause it to immediately change it's current course. Even if Trump had passed some piece of important economic legislation on day one of his administration(which he didn't). It would take a minimum of 6 months before we'd see any measureable effects from that legisation.
Now, it's possible I suppose that the reputation of a president in and of itself could instill optimism or pecimism that could influence the economy a little bit even if he doesn't actually justify it via legislative action, but even if you believe that is the case the numbers tell us that the economy slowed down and trended worse this year than last year. So if Trump is having any effect on the Economy at all, it's a bad effect.
What part of the Obama results are inaccurate, the 1.8% GDP growth? the no year of 3% growth?
Actually, yes that is largely in accurate. You see when Obama took office we actually had -2.8% growth. However one year later we reversed that and had +2.5% growth for a total net gain of 5.3% in the span of one year. Unfortunately after that Republicans got back enough power in congress to filibuster all the the things Obama wanted to do to continue to improve the economy. As a reslut it took a bit longer than it should have to recover, but for the first two years in office when Obama had the power to fix the economy he did.
the record numbers of part time employees for economic reasons? the 9.3 trillion added to the debt?
Yes, those things were caused by a massive recession that Obama enherited from the previous Republican administration not to mention the tax cuts and wars that largely drove the deficit in the earlier years of Obama's administration. As I've repeatedly explained to you the US Economy is a massive entity, and it cannot simply be turned around on a dime regardless of how good or bad your economic policy is.
When president Obama took office he immediately passed legislation to end the recession. It still took about six months for us to start seeing the positive effects of that. Trump passed very little, yet as the year went on the economy continued to trend worse and worse.
the 9.4% U-6 rate he left Trump?
Obama was left a u-6 rate of 16% and climbing by the previous Republican administration. Once Obama put out the fire that Bush started the U-6 rate fell during every successive year of his administration. The 9.4% rate Obama had when he left office was better than Bush in had it in 2003, and better than what Bush and Regan left Clinton in 1992.
all of the unemployment measures have continued to fall at roughtly the exact same rate they were already falling when President Obama took office. Again, Trump passed no significant piece of legisltation to alter their trajectory which is why the economy did okay this year, but as time passes his influence will get greater and greater, and the economy will suffer as a result.