But did you consider that her gender might HELP change perceptions? I doubt Martin Luther King would have been as influential as he was if he were white. But he became the most prominent face of Black America to many white people...and many of them found him (and by extension, black people) to be much less scary than they imagined.
Sometimes it takes strong figures who belong to precisely the groups who are most oppressed. Many Muslim nations have shown this is possible. For example, Pakistan has become decidedly more liberal toward women's rights since Benazir Bhutto was prime minister in the early 90s.
But are we aware of all the religions out there?
For all we know, there could be some random hermit in the rain forrest who started his own religion which only he believes in...do we have to search them all out and send envoys to every one?
If we're going to "talk" to the Ummah and exclude those types, we're inviting those types to fly some more planes into some more buildings.Are those the types we really want to engage in talks?
Hardly. It also hardly requires a scholar of Islam to know that certain groups within the "Muslim world" place women in what we would consider second-class status.
Remember that in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, women are not allowed to drive.
Remember that Northern Sudan enforces a strict interpretation of Shari'ah, and as recently as 2007 sentenced women to death by stoning for adultery.
Remember that the bottom of the 2009 Social Institutions and Gender Index is predominantly Muslim.
Remember that the Taliban, during the time of their control of Afghanistan, denied women the right to even leave the house without a male to escort them, denied them education, and even access to healthcare.
Outreach is about changing perceptions--changing the perceptions especially of one's putative enemies. Where is the need greater for shifting perceptions--among fairly moderate Egyptians or among fundamentalist Afghans and Pashtuns?
If the outreach message is going to be rejected by those putative enemies because of the gender of the messenger, how much can realistically be accomplished?
An envoy to the Ummah who will not be allowed to speak to the entirety of the Ummah is hindered in what she can accomplish.
How is what he said about the issue saying what you say it is saying?
If we're going to "talk" to the Ummah and exclude those types, we're inviting those types to fly some more planes into some more buildings.
I don't think you are suggesting we are somehow asking to be attacked. I would in this case suggest that there are certain organizations we do not want to negotiate with except on our terms.
I think we're asking to be attacked. Do you actually believe that Islamic extremists have the ability to see things from an American Liberal point of view?
Those, "certain organizations", aren't interested in negotiating on anyone's terms.
All the more reason not to have a religious envoy, at all. Hence the reason for the seperation of church and state.
I mean, this is redicualous. Should we have had an envoy to the communists? Or, the Nazis? Hell no, we shouldn't have, just like we shouldn't for Islam. This is PC insanity.
And, once again, The Taliban and Friends do not represent the entire Muslim world.
I agree.
The post of mine you responded to was intended to be tongue-in-cheek.
And there is no Druid World, other than WoW.
I imagine there's a few hippies, socially challenged college kids, and assorted other Uniterian fat chicks that might take exception to that statement. :lol:
I don't see all those billions of Muslims lifting a finger to do anything about, "The Taliban and Friends".
apdst said:Muslims hate America, hence the reason PBO didn;t want to be seen giving support to the Iranian protestors; hence the Iranian government trying to scapegoat the United States for helping the Iranian protestors.
apdst said:Don't forget, most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis.
So Saudi Arabia, with a population of 24 million, represents the 1.5 billion Muslim population?I don't see all those billions of Muslims lifting a finger to do anything about, "The Taliban and Friends". Muslims hate America, hence the reason PBO didn;t want to be seen giving support to the Iranian protestors; hence the Iranian government trying to scapegoat the United States for helping the Iranian protestors. Don't forget, most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis.
And those who didn't accept him shot him, just as they shot Medgar Evers and other civil rights leaders.But did you consider that her gender might HELP change perceptions? I doubt Martin Luther King would have been as influential as he was if he were white. But he became the most prominent face of Black America to many white people...and many of them found him (and by extension, black people) to be much less scary than they imagined.
Talking to some and not others is not exactly showering those "others" with heaps of praise. Talking to some and not others is not exactly friendly and sociable to those "others".I cannot believe you actually said that. Not talking to some one is not inviting them to attack us.
And those who didn't accept him shot him, just as they shot Medgar Evers and other civil rights leaders.
It's easy to remember Dr. King's dramatic speeches on behalf of equality, just as it's easy to remember Brown v Board of Education of Topeka Kansas. It's less easy to remember Selma, March 7, 1965, when 600 civil rights marchers were beaten and tear-gassed at the Edmund Pettus Bridge. It's less easy to remember the US Marshalls that had to escort James Meredith to his classes. It's less easy to remember the soldiers in Little Rock.
There is much more to the history of the Civil Rights movement in this country than Dr. King's "I have a dream" speech, and not all of that history is pretty or moving or inspiring. Some of it, perhaps even most of it, is pretty damn ugly.
No, they do not. But they are part of the Muslim world. They are a vocal part of the Muslim world. They are a part of the Muslim world that is quite determined not to be ignored.And, once again, The Taliban and Friends do not represent the entire Muslim world.
Talking to some and not others is not exactly showering those "others" with heaps of praise. Talking to some and not others is not exactly friendly and sociable to those "others".
Presenting an envoy to the whole of the Ummah who is only going to engage the "moderate" (i.e., already quasi-friendly) portions of the Ummah is getting pretty close to an implicit statement that the rest are not part of the Ummah.
There are two guaranteed ways to piss people off: 1) include them in groups they dislike, and 2) exclude them from groups they like.
Seems to me an envoy to the Ummah ought to have an agenda besides pissing off parts of the Ummah.
It addressed exactly what Kandahar said.Nice post. Too bad it did not address what Kandahar said.
Condi Rice was Secretary of State, not envoy to the Muslim world.She does have an agenda besides pissing off anyone.
We are still the US. We still promote women to positions of power. Condi Rice was able to do her job, and i suspect this woman will be able to as well.
It addressed exactly what Kandahar said.
Dr. King was significant in advancing civil rights in this country, but the path by which civil rights were advanced was quite violent and bloody at several junctures, and there were quite a few who were determined to resist the change that others desired.
Dr. King did a lot. He did not do it all, and he did not do any of it alone.
Moreover, if our own culture of political correctness is so rigid and unyielding that we cannot acknowledge the very real cultural cross currents that will impact an outreach effort to other cultures, just how in the hell are any of us supposed to hear those other cultures?
Everybody wants "outreach" and "talks". Great. Fine. Wonderful. Are you willing to hear the Sudanese defend their applications of Shari'ah? Are you prepared to listen to Saudis defend the prohibition against women driving? Are you prepared to hear the defense of the burqua and the hijab?
If you cannot listen to those things, whatever you think you might be doing, the one thing you are not doing is "talking".
Condi Rice was Secretary of State, not envoy to the Muslim world.
No, they do not. But they are part of the Muslim world. They are a vocal part of the Muslim world. They are a part of the Muslim world that is quite determined not to be ignored.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?