- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 104,979
- Reaction score
- 95,779
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Actually it would be more correct to say "Those individuals have a natural ability to produce an antibody that works against _[fill in the blank]_ - even though they might not actually have those antibodies in their system at any given moment due to the fact that they haven't received the right "trigger" to initiate the production of those antibodies.".
fair enough. Well said.
That means that there is such a thing as "natural immunity" (bearing in mind that "immunity" varies in degree) - especially if "immunity" is defined as "an ability to defeat infection PRIOR to showing clinically significant signs of the infection".
That was exactly my point! Lucky them!
But we need to keep in mind there are other factors involved in familial living situations, so there's a shitload of variables.
I have no idea of the research or conclusions drawn since early-on in the pandemic. It's a fascinating subject. And who knows? Perhaps by now it's even been disproven, due to us earlier overlooking another unknown variable?