Mark F
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,814
- Reaction score
- 3,835
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Throughout history the average person has been a serf - completely blindsided by the Machiavellian schemes the oligarchies that ruled them ran down on them. It's the common thread of history.
Only for brief periods have societies arisen where the ruling class or government was constrained by law, and the people relatively free. The Roman Republic before it abandoned the rule of law and embraced the rule of tyrants was the best example, but of course that was shortlived, as history will record that America was shortlived.
As Annie Machon points out though, history is written by the victors - had Germany won the war, the burning of the Reichstag would be recorded in the history books as a terrorist act committed by Marxist revolutionaries. When in fact it was one of the more famous false flags in history.
And so it goes with 9/11. As of now the victors, the oligarchy which controls our society, our institutions, and our government, are the ones who are writing the storyline.
Read enough history and study how power is accrued, maintained, and wielded, and it doesn't take long before the pattern of false flags, palace intrigue, and Machiavellian schemes become the obvious norm. As I said, it is history over and over again.
If you are not well read enough in history, that does not make you a buffoon any more than my being well read in history makes me a genius. What it says is that you are ignorant of these things and I am informed. The hope for you, and the hope for society and posterity is that enough people will become informed and be able to push back against our overlords and restore liberty and take back control of our government for the people - under the rule of law, not the rule of men.
What, am I married to the guy?? Do I have to defend his mismatched socks??
I probably disagree with Tarpley on just about every other subject under the sun other than false flags; but on the subject of false flags - the guy encyclopedic. I'm a chemist, and 2 of the most brilliant chemists I know are dyed in the wool Marxists - doesn't make them any less brilliant at chemistry.
Blah, blah blah, more evasions and derails. Have any intention of addressing any of the concerns I have raised about your highly implausible and incomplete hypothesis?
How about addressing the many false claims you have made and upon which your tale relies?
- Hani Hanjours "incredible feats of flying acrobatics" that were in fact both pedestrian and sloppy.
- The missing 'Pentagon trillions' that weren't
- The '85 confiscated video's showing the Pentagon being hit' that don't
- Buildings collapsing "in free-fall" or even "near free-fall" (whatever the heck that is supposed to mean) that didn't
- "Molten steel smoldering in the rubble pile after two months" for which neither you or anyone else it seems can provide any proof (the video you referred me to showed a bent beam, not a molten pool), nor explain how it relates to collapse initiation
- The BBC's mistaken identity report of hijackers still alive
Etc, etc, etc, etc,...
I notice that frequently when these flaws are pointed out to you that your response is to pretend the discussion never happened and quietly move on rather than acknowledge the correct information and modifying your hypothesis where necessary. That is the behavior of a believer, not a seeker of truth.