• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Unanswered questions in regards to 9/11[W:762]

BmanMcfly said:
Lmao. .. I proved you wrong preemptively, and then you used that freshly proven wrong case to make the point.

Funny, I further am right because I knew you had nothing more than the naked assertion.

Then you wonder why people accuse you of trolling...
Click to expand...

****s up like that all the time LOL

its all innuendo, all show no go! LMAO
 
150+ posts in, do we have a list yet of the unanswered questions to which the answers could blow our whole understanding of what happened out of the water?
 
Mark F said:
150+ posts in, do we have a list yet of the unanswered questions to which the answers could blow our whole understanding of what happened out of the water?
Click to expand...

Yeah, the entire list would, in fact, probably the first one on the list if you list them in random order.
 
Unanswered questions in regards to 9/11

Mark F said:
150+ posts in, do we have a list yet of the unanswered questions to which the answers could blow our whole understanding of what happened out of the water?
Click to expand...

I can't help those that desire to remain willingly ignorant, or simply lack the intelligence to recognize it.

Mark F said:
That you don't know illustrates my point perfectly.
Click to expand...

You have a point?

I explained why an explanation was not valid, you replied with precisely that explanation that I had moments before explained was not valid and why it was not valid.

And of course oz comes in and gives a thumbs up to absolute fallacious nonsense, right on cue.
 
BmanMcfly said:
I can't help those that desire to remain willingly ignorant, or simply lack the intelligence to recognize it.



You have a point?

I explained why an explanation was not valid, you replied with precisely that explanation that I had moments before explained was not valid and why it was not valid.

And of course oz comes in and gives a thumbs up to absolute fallacious nonsense, right on cue.
Click to expand...

Your logic (as usual) was faulty. Not only that, you failed to offer a more plausible alternative, nor is it likely you ever will.
 
Mark F said:
Your logic (as usual) was faulty. Not only that, you failed to offer a more plausible alternative, nor is it likely you ever will.
Click to expand...

"When you can't address the argument, address the person"
 
NWO_Spook said:
Be specific or I could be writing essays for weeks, and I'm not really interested in doing that just for truthers who won't even read them. I'd rather watch golf.
Click to expand...

I will read whatever it is that you write, I promise. And asking me to be specific is odd considering what you said to me. You said "ignorant and juvenile." You tell me, sir.
 
Jango said:
I will read whatever it is that you write, I promise. And asking me to be specific is odd considering what you said to me. You said "ignorant and juvenile." You tell me, sir.
Click to expand...

Just revise the posts in this exchange. The 'ignorant and juvenile' tag was a response to this idiotic rant directed toward me:

Jango said:
So you do exactly what I said you do (a few weeks, perhaps months ago): you only think when the controllers of information move the peg. Outside of that, you're brain dead. "Nope, they said they didn't do it, so there ends my thinking because I have wholehearted faith in them and that they wouldn't lie to me."
Click to expand...

Which is, of course, ignorant and juvenile. Now do you understand? :roll: Christ this BS gets tedious.
 
Last edited:
NWO_Spook said:
Just revise the posts in this exchange. The 'ignorant and juvenile' tag was a response to this idiotic rant directed toward me:

Which is, of course, ignorant and juvenile. Now do you understand? :roll: Christ this BS gets tedious.
Click to expand...

was still an accurate assessment.
 
So...

Back to the OP.....

What unanswered questions in regards to 9/11 are there?

And do they undermine the core concepts* of what some call the "Official Conspiracy Theory"?

* Core concepts being 19 Bad Muslims hijack 4 airliners, crash 3 into buildings and the subsequent damage and fire results in the whole WTC complex and many surrounding buildings being destroyed.
 
Fledermaus said:
So...

Back to the OP.....

What unanswered questions in regards to 9/11 are there?
Click to expand...
1) I am not aware of any significant questions that are unanswered; AND
2) None of those opposing the accepted narratives - "truthers" if you wish - have identified a single significant question in this thread.

Fledermaus said:
And do they undermine the core concepts* of what some call the "Official Conspiracy Theory"?
Click to expand...
Obviously those questions cannot undermine core concepts - or any concepts - if there are no questions.

Fledermaus said:
* Core concepts being 19 Bad Muslims hijack 4 airliners, crash 3 into buildings and the subsequent damage and fire results in the whole WTC complex and many surrounding buildings being destroyed.
Click to expand...
Good enough scope as a starter. Might be better to include specifically that there was no additional MHI - but your OP - your call.
 
ozeco41 said:
1) I am not aware of any significant questions that are unanswered; AND
2) None of those opposing the accepted narratives - "truthers" if you wish - have identified a single significant question in this thread.

Obviously those questions cannot undermine core concepts - or any concepts - if there are no questions.

Good enough scope as a starter. Might be better to include specifically that there was no additional MHI - but your OP - your call.
Click to expand...

I have been wondering what can of worms this might open. But it remains worm free.....
 
Fledermaus said:
I have been wondering what can of worms this might open. But it remains worm free.....
Click to expand...
They are all scared of being specific - part of this current fad of relying on lies through vague false generalisations.

If you don't say something specific you cannot be corrected...

...whilst lying in your teeth that you have corrected alleged errors by debunkers. Said "errors" also being beyond their abilty to specify.

So foggy fog is foggy - and I cannot be arsed to parse through the layers of deception and outright lies. And I ignore the personal attacks - sure sign that the person resorting to PA (a) knows they are out gunned; AND (B) has no case.

Same goes for multi layer projections.

The old paradox from Philosophy 101:
"Epimenides said all Cretans are liars."

"Epimenides was a Cretan"

Substitute "all debunkers" for "all Cretans" and replace "Epimenides" with the name of your favourite truther.

Sadly any hope of serious discussion around here is gone. The days of "genuine truthers" now ancient history - like about 2010...
.... although I did meet one new "genuine truther" about one year back on JREF.
 
BmanMcfly said:
What is it from the core to the window ?? 20-40 meters? 1- 2 windows... so, it widened by what, 2° max?

Wait a second... thus is your claim... why am I tasked with proving it?

I'm saying that explanation does not cut it... so, either you haven't made your case strong enough, or you are wrong in your analysis...


Anyway, what I was getting at




View attachment 67172296
- Square outline to demonstrate just how much tilt
- black lines within the circle show that another floor has been hit by the ROOSD floors
- Orange lines are where those floors are no longer there, since the "debris" has already passed through the floors higher.

Then, about 1 second later...

View attachment 67172297

Look where the orange lines were from the last image, the debris shoots out just before the outer walls started blowing out .

When you look for this effect in the video form, it shows far more clearly than I can describe with 2 pictures and text.
Click to expand...


in addition to yours. how about this ignored jewel



check out the bottom of the building blowing out and the interference.
 
So...

Back to the OP.....

What unanswered questions in regards to 9/11 are there?

And do they undermine the core concepts* of what some call the "Official Conspiracy Theory"?

* Core concepts being 19 Bad Muslims hijack 4 airliners, crash 3 into buildings and the subsequent damage and fire results in the whole WTC complex and many surrounding buildings being destroyed.
 
Fledermaus said:
So...

Back to the OP.....

What unanswered questions in regards to 9/11 are there?

And do they undermine the core concepts* of what some call the "Official Conspiracy Theory"?

* Core concepts being 19 Bad Muslims hijack 4 airliners, crash 3 into buildings and the subsequent damage and fire results in the whole WTC complex and many surrounding buildings being destroyed.
Click to expand...

Bumpity bump
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom