• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ukraine rolls out its 1st Mad Max Assault Unit after the Russians

Juin

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
20,966
Reaction score
7,043
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
.


The pro Kyiv side of the aisle poured scorn when reports appeared of Russian motorcycle assault units. Emblematic of an attitude in the west to dismiss as junk, or useless anything Russian. Taking a step aside, it doesnt even take a soldier to see what motorcycle units can bring to combat. And it is not even new. Germans employed motorcycle units- kradschutzen truppen- throughout WWII. Effectively too. Afghan Ruffians and other Ruffians in the African Sahel have been known to use motorcycles as well.

Its a good thing Ukrainians dont take lessons from their DP supporters. Ignorant of the disdain DP experts have for motorcycles, they went ahead and rolled out their own motorcycle unit. Clearly they studied the Russians and saw the merits of motor cycles.

It will be interesting to hear the opinion of those who sneered at Mad Max Assault Units



<<<<

The Armed Forces of Ukraine have formed their first motorized assault company using motorcycles within the 425th Skala Assault Regiment.​


This unit trains in tactics for moving in large groups of motorcycles, each carrying two fighters armed with AKS-74U rifles, allowing them to shoot while on the move.

Exercises include operations under smoke cover, possibly deployed by drones, aiming for rapid capture of enemy positions, reducing enemy reaction time. Additionally, the motorcycles have specific roles, such as transporting electronic equipment, evacuating wounded, and carrying ammunition.

This strategy is already known from the use of Russian troops, who have developed similar tactics in recent years, involving operations with dozens or even hundreds of motorcycles for fast, maneuverable assaults. The Russians train these groups to operate on fronts up to 600 meters, advancing up to 1.5 km, and to hold positions for several days until reinforcements arrive. The groups are functionally organized, with motorcyclists specialized in electronic warfare, medical evacuation, mine laying, and chemical support.

The goal of these motorized units is to exploit mobility to make rapid advances in open terrain, complicating the enemy’s response and ensuring efficiency in assault operations.
<<<<



 
"Please, westerners, tell us how to defeat these evil plans!"

:rolleyes:

I know and care not what OP chooses to refer to as "Mad Max assault units" beyond that it refers to some kind of improvised machinery and equipment used to attack. And to that end, I'd say Ukraine has been doing a hell of a lot better than Russia, whose only solutions - apart from doing their best to reverse-engineer Ukraine's drone game - is to throw metal and meat at foes fighting for their souls.

It worked to the tune of 20,000,000 bodies defending Stalingrad. Is there that dedication for stealing land from raped, tortured, and murdered Ukranians?
 
It's not an aisle. It's a manhole cover.

The Russian side is below that.
 
The pro Kyiv side of the aisle poured scorn when reports appeared of Russian motorcycle assault units.

There is a qualitative difference between using motorcycles in situations that offer tactical advantage, and using motorcycles out of necessity due to a lack of APC's and other options.

Ukraine is the former. Russia is the latter.
 
"Please, westerners, tell us how to defeat these evil plans!"

:rolleyes:

I know and care not what OP chooses to refer to as "Mad Max assault units" beyond that it refers to some kind of improvised machinery and equipment used to attack. And to that end, I'd say Ukraine has been doing a hell of a lot better than Russia, whose only solutions - apart from doing their best to reverse-engineer Ukraine's drone game - is to throw metal and meat at foes fighting for their souls.

It worked to the tune of 20,000,000 bodies defending Stalingrad. Is there that dedication for stealing land from raped, tortured, and murdered Ukranians?



Do you have a military opinion on the effective use of motorcycles in war? The Bandera side of the forum poopooed it as desperation and suicidal when it was news of Russian Mad Max assault units spotted at various places. Do you have anything to contribute?
 
"Please, westerners, tell us how to defeat these evil plans!"

It worked to the tune of 20,000,000 bodies defending Stalingrad. Is there that dedication for stealing land from raped, tortured, and murdered Ukranians?
The first problem is that the land is stolen by Ukraine itself , and not by Russia.
 
It was ceded by the USSR to the Ukraine SSR.

That isn't theft.

Stop lying.
It wasn't "ceded". No matter how it is called by Western propagandists (the one whom you are parroting) the whole process was ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The Soviet constitution mandated holding the referendum and asking the people whether they are OK to go to different republic. And no referendum on an transfer of Crimea or Donbass was held.
So it does not matter how do you like to call it, it is totally illegal and legally void.
So all the land presents made to Ukraine by illegal actions of soviet government equal to plain theft.
 
There is a qualitative difference between using motorcycles in situations that offer tactical advantage, and using motorcycles out of necessity due to a lack of APC's and other options.

Ukraine is the former. Russia is the latter.
They are both doing it. Evolution of battlefield tactics which are far different than previous wars. Drones have changed everything. This is in some ways similar to what machine guns did when introduced in WW I. The battlefield is now under massive surveillance and big slow moving things like tanks are vulnerable to much cheaper and agile weapons systems. Not many places to hide except underground. Concentrations of men or vehicles draws attention very quickly.
 
It wasn't "ceded". No matter how it is called by Western propagandists (the one whom you are parroting) the whole process was ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The Soviet constitution mandated holding the referendum and asking the people whether they are OK to go to different republic. And no referendum on an transfer of Crimea or Donbass was held.
So it does not matter how do you like to call it, it is totally illegal and legally void.
So all the land presents made to Ukraine by illegal actions of soviet government equal to plain theft.

It was ceded.

Stop the stupid revisionist nonsense.
 
"Please, westerners, tell us how to defeat these evil plans!"

:rolleyes:

I know and care not what OP chooses to refer to as "Mad Max assault units" beyond that it refers to some kind of improvised machinery and equipment used to attack. And to that end, I'd say Ukraine has been doing a hell of a lot better than Russia, whose only solutions - apart from doing their best to reverse-engineer Ukraine's drone game - is to throw metal and meat at foes fighting for their souls.

It worked to the tune of 20,000,000 bodies defending Stalingrad. Is there that dedication for stealing land from raped, tortured, and murdered Ukranians?
Not even close. I mean they are constantly falling victim to shit we learned to counter in the 40s with our Shermans.
 
He keeps telling us what this was always about. It wasnt about nazis or banderites. Its all about reclaiming land.
Which is Russian in fact. And yes. Is occupied by banderies and nazis. Correct.
 
It wasn't "ceded". No matter how it is called by Western propagandists (the one whom you are parroting) the whole process was ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The Soviet constitution mandated holding the referendum and asking the people whether they are OK to go to different republic. And no referendum on an transfer of Crimea or Donbass was held.
So it does not matter how do you like to call it, it is totally illegal and legally void.
So all the land presents made to Ukraine by illegal actions of soviet government equal to plain theft.
Plain theft by the soviet government LOL!
 
The soviet union ceded it. You can stop lying now but i dont expect anything different from you.
It may be more useful if you stop pushing nonsense. It was not "ceded". Ukraine wasn't a separate country to begin with and it could not accept any "ceded" lands. Nonsense.
 
Actually there was a referendum in every ukrainian oblast.


We even have the vote totals broken down by each Oblast. Please lie less. After the ousting of Yanukovych, Ukraine held two elections before eventually deciding on Zelensky in the second.
 
It was stolen even during Soviet period. Ukraine captured it illegally upon breaking away from Russia in 1991.
Ukraine captured their own country? Odd.
 
By Ukrainian soviet authorities, The traitor Khrustchev for example.
Lol! Krustchev wasnt even premier in the 90s. The ****?! I mean this floundering of yours shows me i might have won my greatest victory here on DP. Yeltzin was the guy who finalized it.
 
Back
Top Bottom