rebelbuc
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 574
- Reaction score
- 235
- Location
- New Orleans
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
For some reason, many conservatives think taking care of the planet we live on is a bad idea. I don't get it.
We're still waiting for a legitimate link. Stop drinking the cool aid and reading Democrat talking points. Use your brain and logic and it becomes clear how the AGW alarmists have an agenda... and can't prove their claims on a level playing field of true science.
The Heidelberg Appeal
The Heidelberg Appeal was publicly released at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro. By the end of the 1992 summit, 425 scientists and other intellectual leaders had signed the appeal. Since then, word of mouth has prompted thousands more scientists to lend their support. Today, more than 4,000 signatories, from over 100 countries have signed it, including more than 70 Nobel Prize winners. In spite of this spontaneous and growing support from the world's scientific community, the Heidelberg Appeal has received very little media attention.
Neither a statement of corporate interests nor a denial of environmental problems, the Heidelberg Appeal is a quiet call for reason and a recognition of scientific progress as the solution to, not the cause of, the health and environmental problems that we face. The appeal expresses a conviction that modern society is the best equipped in human history to solve the world's ills, provided that they do not sacrifice science, intellectual honesty and common sense to political opportunism and irrational fears.
Why do you think that they refuse to release code and data... and find creative ways to make the graphs say what the IPCC political-pseudo science witch doctors tell them to say?
Remember that some of the e-mails talk about controlling the peer review process of the 'proper' journals to keep out dissenting views. So no publication of contrasting views = total agreement of the experts.
A University of Minnesota professor managed to publish his findings that heavy storm cycles for the last 100,000 years have had a very steady and flat cycle - not trending upwards as the global warming crowd predicts in ALL of their models. Two of the professors who are currently under investigation in 'climategate' were instrumental in the professor losing his tenure, his position at the University, AND all professional credentials. Some of the released e-mails seem to refer to this conspiracy to silence a legitimate scientific research that managed to get published that casts some doubts on a small portion and claim by the Global Warming crowd.
Who is investigating who?
Yep, Add a British accent to anything and it sound so wonderfully condescending doesn't it now? Face it, GW hoax is exposed as the global taxation scheme it always was...Now, if you really want to think that man is responsible for temp changes or that we can control it then I suggest you pick an element that is more prevalent than CO2 for God's sake. :roll:
j-mac
For one, I believe the American People will begin to investigate the acceptance of this global warming claim, it's foundation, who's been profiting by it....and how it hasn't been proven, that it's not science.
.....Confirming the earlier scandal about cherry-picked data, the e-mails show CRU scientists conspiring to evade legal requests, under the Freedom of Information Act, for their underlying data. It's a basic rule of science that you don't just get to report your results and ask other people to take you on faith. You also have to report your data and your specific method of analysis, so that others can check it and, yes, even criticize it. Yet that is precisely what the CRU scientists have refused......
Oh, the American people are investigating the "acceptance". Now I know the specifics. :2razz:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?