Ron Mars
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,194
- Reaction score
- 170
- Location
- Central Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Huh? The US is no longer going to participate in the air strikes in Libya? WTF?
The US will only conduct strike missions "to back up the allies in case of need" but not participate on a regular basis apparently. I support the President on Libya but this is a major mistake that may very well doom his stated policy.
What do you guys think about this?
U.S. to pull strike jets from Libya mission
By Slobodan Lekic - The Associated Press
Posted : Monday Apr 4, 2011 8:36:38 EDT
BRUSSELS — The U.S. military was pulling its warplanes from front-line missions Monday and shifting to a support role in the Libyan conflict, officials said.
Britain, France and other NATO allies will now provide the fighter jets for intercept and ground-attack missions that enforce a no-fly zone over this North African country.
The hand-over is expected to take place later Monday, a NATO official said.
“There won’t be a capabilities gap,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of regulations.
Another official, who could not be named for the same reason, said the U.S. would continue to play a major role in the operation, with one of the largest national contingents. Most U.S. planes will perform support tasks, leaving offensive tasks to their NATO allies.
In Washington, Defense Department spokesman Navy Capt. Darryn James said U.S. activity will formally end at 2200 GMT (6 p.m. EDT). U.S. aircraft currently account for 90 of the 206 planes deployed by NATO in the Libyan conflict.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates told Congress last week the U.S. would continue to provide assets that others don’t have in sufficient numbers. These will likely include AWACS air surveillance planes, electronic reconnaissance aircraft and aerial refueling tankers.
American air power — including Air Force AC-130 gunships and A-10 Thunderbolts, and Marine Corps AV-8B Harriers — will still be available to back up the allies in case of need.
Western jets have been hitting the forces of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi for more than two weeks. They initially targeted anti-aircraft missile defenses and quickly crushed a government offensive by destroying a large number of tanks, armored vehicles, artillery and other vehicles advancing into rebel-held areas.
But military experts say Gadhafi’s forces have rapidly reorganized since then, shedding their heavy armor and relying on light forces to repeatedly ambush the lightly armed rebels.
NATO said its aircraft flew 154 sorties over Libya on Sunday, the fourth day since the alliance assumed full control over the mission from the U.S.-led international force. It described 58 of those flights as “strike sorties.”
NATO does not release information on the number of targets bombed.
In the first four days of the NATO operation, alliance aircraft have flown a total of 701 sorties, the statement said.
Flights by fighters and attack jets accounted for 40 percent of that total. The rest are by AWACS surveillance aircraft, aerial refueling tankers, maritime patrol planes, search and rescue helicopters, and other support aircraft.
Associated Press writer Pauline Jelinek in Washington contributed to this report.
U.S. to pull strike jets from Libya mission - Navy News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Navy Times
So much for the US doing NATO's heavy lifting, lol. I see this as a good thing.
I wish I could agree SB.
Gaddafi will see it as a good thing too but for different reasons.
BTW, your new avatar is great!
They must be gearing up for military action in other parts of Africa where the slaughter of thousands is an affront to our American values and the president will vow to step in because we MUST...
Gaddafi's got other things to worry about. Between people in his camp defecting and his financial resources drying up, he knows his days are numbered, American strike aircraft in the equation or not.
In other unrelated news, Gaddafi feels free to show himself in public without the worry he might eat a missile.
President 0bama has got to change the direction in Libya or it will be lost.
Gaddafi salutes supporters in Tripoli
RABAT (Reuters) – Libyan state television Monday showed live footage of leader Muammar Gaddafi saluting supporters from a jeep that drove outside his fortified compound of Bab al-Aziziyah in Tripoli.
A written newsflash read: "The brother leader among his supporters."
Gaddafi briefly waved to his backers through the roof of his vehicle as bodyguards tried to prevent his supporters from mobbing him.
His appearance came as one of his envoys shuttled around southern Europe in an effort to convince the international community a negotiated end to the fighting was possible.
Gaddafi salutes supporters in Tripoli - Yahoo! News
I sure hope that's right SB.
Gaddafi is a survivor and will not leave unless he's forced out.
What's the matter with the French, why can't they change the direction in Libya?
What's the matter with the French, why can't they change the direction in Libya?
Why can't ANYONE change the direction in Libya? Because there is a disconnect between stated goals and stated means. The international community wants Gaddafi out of Libya. In reality however, a no-fly zone is a pretty piss-poor way to effect regime change.
Why can't ANYONE change the direction in Libya? Because there is a disconnect between stated goals and stated means. The international community wants Gaddafi out of Libya. In reality however, a no-fly zone is a pretty piss-poor way to effect regime change.
0bama could change the direction if he decided to take decisive action. He could do that today.
If the US accepts a situation where Gaddafi remains in power it will be a disaster for the President and the country.
This is why if you are going to get involved in wars, you need a damn plan. Obama should not have called for Qadaffi's removal if he didn't actually plan to actually do get it done. If he had instead consistently promoted a message of "we are only stopping the slaughter not getting involved in local politics" this would actually make sense. Still, the overall result is little more than a missed opportunity rather than a complete disaster so I'll give Obama credit on that front at least.
In other unrelated news, Gaddafi feels free to show himself in public without the worry he might eat a missile.
President 0bama has got to change the direction in Libya or it will be lost.
Gaddafi salutes supporters in Tripoli
RABAT (Reuters) – Libyan state television Monday showed live footage of leader Muammar Gaddafi saluting supporters from a jeep that drove outside his fortified compound of Bab al-Aziziyah in Tripoli.
A written newsflash read: "The brother leader among his supporters."
Gaddafi briefly waved to his backers through the roof of his vehicle as bodyguards tried to prevent his supporters from mobbing him.
His appearance came as one of his envoys shuttled around southern Europe in an effort to convince the international community a negotiated end to the fighting was possible.
Gaddafi salutes supporters in Tripoli - Yahoo! News
Why does he have to change direction in Libya? Why is Libya even our problem? Maybe we should quit pissing through money on these foreign wars and focus on our own problems.
Cote d'Ivoire is next lol.
0bama could change the direction if he decided to take decisive action. He could do that today.
If the US accepts a situation where Gaddafi remains in power it will be a disaster for the President and the country.
Because 0bama made it our problem and established a policy that Gaddafi must leave.
Should he backpeddle now it will be viewed as weakness and indecision.
No one will take him seriously. That's a disaster for him and the country.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?