• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Jobless Rate Unexpectedly Declines to 8.6%


Wow, not only didn't you present facts, but you switched subjects. Do you know conservative, he posts here. We're discussing j's bogus list. :coffeepap
 

j, while I laugh at your sources, with the WSJ opinion page, an opinion, being the only credible source, proving you drink the koolaid like I say, none of it consititutes a take over. Insurance is still a private busines, the banks still function independently, the auto industry is not owned by the government. You are again inaccurate and have to go to koolaid drinkers to post links. Sad as that is, you will never convince anyone using these sources. Sorry.
 

There are no credible sources. Not one. They all have a point of view and an agenda. Sad, but true.
 
There are no credible sources. Not one. They all have a point of view and an agenda. Sad, but true.

Again, point of view or bias is not what matters. I tell j this often. Accuracy does. Those sources often if not always are inaccurate, and often comically so.
 
Again, point of view or bias is not what matters. I tell j this often. Accuracy does. Those sources often if not always are inaccurate, and often comically so.

....and I'm sure there are many that dispute the accuracy of your "facts". It's the way of politics.

You do NOT get to be the decider of what is or is not accurate.
 
....and I'm sure there are many that dispute the accuracy of your "facts". It's the way of politics.

You do NOT get to be the decider of what is or is not accurate.

Facts are facts. Sorry. Disputing them would be silly. It is often how we interpret them that is the problem. Some wrongly claim that a regulation is a take over or running a business. This is factually incorrect.

But yes, any thinking person can distinquish between silly ass opinion and facts. I do get to call these sites on this.
 

Facts are facts.

Really? Not in politics.
 
See, this is the problem with attempting to have a conversation with someone that practices transference, and projection in their heavily laden koolaid opinions, derived from such sources as MSNBC, and DailyKOS, MediaMatters...etc. Couple that with the overboard arrogance of thinking themselves some sort of educrat and you get this. No source good enough (unless it agrees with their agenda, as is the case with WSJ in the recent tax cut debacle, or dailybeast for Christ sake), No pundit who's opinion they can agree with unless it is Cris Matthews, or Amy Goodman, No argument that measures up to their own warped, skewed, talking point pap that means nothing unless you agree with them.

Boo, is utterly a waste of time, but generally good to hone skills with if you like going round and round in circles.


j-mac
 

First, I don't use dailyKOS, media matters, or political entertainers on any of the networks. That is your modus of operation, so you're projecting a bit here.

No, present no pundit. Present actual evidence. That's all I'm asking.
 
I have never read the "Daily Kos", and the exchange between j-mac and Boo Radley about said blog got me curious. I looked it up, clicked on a link at random within the publication, and came up with this:

Rick Perry for President?

Vote in This Urgent Poll

Scroll down to vote


Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
From the conversation, I gathered that the Daily Kos had to be a left wing publication of some sort. Now, can we conclude from that the left wing is interested in a Perry candidacy?

I can see where it would, as Perry would be a lot easier to beat than Romney.

Just wondering.
 

Now that's funny, I don't care who you are. :2funny:
 

Hmmm....that's odd, took you to Newsmax eh....Here maybe I can help...

Daily Kos :: News Community Action

Or could this just be more dishonest mockery?


j-mac
 
Yes, even in politics there are facts. yes, there are.

Yes, indeed, there certainly facts, facts that you want to ignore

 
First, I don't use dailyKOS, media matters, or political entertainers on any of the networks. That is your modus of operation, so you're projecting a bit here.

No, present no pundit. Present actual evidence. That's all I'm asking.


Talk to the hand dude....You are becoming just ridiculous as far as debate goes. As Barney Frank once derided one of his own constituents, "Sir, I would have better luck arguing with a coffee table." You are not open to anything that doesn't agree with your own opinion, so have fun with that.


j-mac
 

Meaning you can't do what was requested. You only have koolaid drinking pundits, and you share the same cup. Enjoy. :coffeepap
 
Meaning you can't do what was requested. You only have koolaid drinking pundits, and you share the same cup. Enjoy. :coffeepap


What ever gets you through the night dude. I think you know better than that, but your own projection here is amazing, and what is further amazing, is that you are so blind as to not even see it.....heh, heh...My guess is that you won't be able to move on without responding to this, which is just plain sad dude....I can only thank my lucky stars that my children are in collage here in SC.


j-mac
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…