"Dr. Cyril Broderick, A Liberian scientist and a former professor of Plant Pathology at the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry says the West, particularly the U.S. is responsible for the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Dr. Broderick claims the following in an exclusive article published in the Daily Observer based in Monrovia, Liberia. He wrote the following:The US Department of Defense (DoD) is funding Ebola trials on humans, trials which started just weeks before the Ebola outbreak in Guinea and Sierra Leone. The reports continue and state that the DoD gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a Canadian pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research. This research work involved injecting and infusing healthy humans with the deadly Ebola virus. Hence, the DoD is listed as a collaborator in a “First in Human” Ebola clinical trial (NCT02041715, which started in January 2014 shortly before an Ebola epidemic was declared in West Africa in March."snip
"
Is it possible that the United States Department of Defense (DOD) and other Western countries are directly responsible for infecting Africans with the Ebola virus? Dr. Broderick claims that the U.S. government has a research laboratory located in a town called Kenema in Sierra Leone that studies what he calls “viral fever bioterrorism”, It is also the town where he acknowledges that is the “epicentre of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.” Is it a fact? Is Dr. Broderick a conspiracy theorist? He says that “there is urgent need for affirmative action in protecting the less affluent of poorer countries, especially African citizens, whose countries are not as scientifically and industrially endowed as the United States and most Western countries, sources of most viral or bacterial GMOs that are strategically designed as biological weapons.” He also asks an important question when he says “It is most disturbing that the U. S. Government has been operating a viral hemorrhagic fever bioterrorism research laboratory in Sierra Leone. Are there others?”
They're not there to treat ebola patients directly.Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?
Not Global Research :lol:Who do you trust?
Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?
Best to read the article in its' entirety.
U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist
U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist | Global Research
How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away?
Why do we have Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone?
Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?
There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the story, and a precedent.
Who do you trust?
[/INDENT]Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?
Best to read the article in its' entirety.
U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist
U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist | Global Research
How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away?
Why do we have Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone?
Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?
There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the story, and a precedent.
Who do you trust?
Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?
[/INDENT]
I'll never believe that without a lot of ironclad proof.
Why would the USA spread a disease that could potentially kill millions of Americans?
I'll never believe that without a lot of ironclad proof.
Why would the USA spread a disease that could potentially kill millions of Americans?
They're not there to treat ebola patients directly.
Not Global Research :lol:
Is it possible that Guatemala is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak? The answer to both is yes, but people who aren't conspiracy theorists don't deal with far-fetched possibilities but actual facts and evidence from reputable sources. Most of the article deals with something that happened almost seventy years ago.
The Liberian doctor is more than likely wrong. However, the possibility does exist. Governments have done awful things with awful things many, many times in our collective history.
Best to read the article in its' entirety.
U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist
U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist | Global Research
How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away?
Why do we have Bio-Weapons labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone?
Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans?
There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the story, and a precedent.
Who do you trust?
Is it possible the US is directly or indirectly behind this outbreak?
[/INDENT]
The Liberian doctor is more than likely wrong. However, the possibility does exist. Governments have done awful things with awful things many, many times in our collective history.
Yes! That is the point, and a liitle proof provided with collective history to back it up. Those that categorically state NO!, truly mean, I hope NO!, because they believe in the White House on the Hill propaganda as fact.
I love this! The point isn't whether the accusations are actually true or not, the point is zOMG EBIL US GOVERNMENT AND STUPID SHEEPLE!!11!!! :lamo
No, not even close. The question was asked if it is possible. Apparently you do not know what 'possible' means.
I do know what possible means. But as I said before, "possible" doesn't matter, because almost anything is possible. Yes, it is possible that the US started the Ebola outbreak. It is also theoretically possible that it was started by ISIS, Russia, Guatemala, Coca-Cola, Global Research, DaveFagan, and pretty much anyone. If there is no evidence that something that is "possible" is also "true" or even "likely," then the only discussion of said "possibility" will be had by people who already have their own opinion on the matter. Only people who already think that the US government is sinister are talking about the far-fetched possibility of the US having started this Ebola epidemic.
I do know what possible means. But as I said before, "possible" doesn't matter, because almost anything is possible. Yes, it is possible that the US started the Ebola outbreak. It is also theoretically possible that it was started by ISIS, Russia, Guatemala, Coca-Cola, Global Research, DaveFagan, and pretty much anyone. If there is no evidence that something that is "possible" is also "true" or even "likely," then the only discussion of said "possibility" will be had by people who already have their own opinion on the matter. Only people who already think that the US government is sinister are talking about the far-fetched possibility of the US having started this Ebola epidemic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?