• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Eyes Bank Pay Overhaul

winston53660

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
29,262
Reaction score
10,126
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration has begun serious talks about how it can change compensation practices across the financial-services industry, including at companies that did not receive federal bailout money, according to people familiar with the matter.

U.S. Eyes Bank Pay Overhaul - WSJ.com

Hmmmm I lean towards that this should be a shareholder responsibility. But I also think regulators actually need to regulate esp. things like credit default swaps.
 
Hmmmm I lean towards that this should be a shareholder responsibility.

Interesting, thanks for posting this.

I think it's a good idea, at the very least to investigate.

Shareholders were responsible any number of previous times things like this happened, and they failed. Of course, because they have no interest in playing to rules that constrain profit, or a long term stable economy. They have profits, often short-term, as their goal (and we know this and accept it).

All they are doing is looking at some near-universal bad practices, and putting them out of bounds. They are free to play the game using any strategy they want, excluding some known-bad strategies that lead to catastrophe. Shareholders and CEOs are then free to pursue profit, without as much concern that in doing so they will take the entire U.S. economy down with them.
 
Interesting, thanks for posting this.

I think it's a good idea, at the very least to investigate.

Shareholders were responsible any number of previous times things like this happened, and they failed. Of course, because they have no interest in playing to rules that constrain profit, or a long term stable economy. They have profits, often short-term, as their goal (and we know this and accept it).

All they are doing is looking at some near-universal bad practices, and putting them out of bounds. They are free to play the game using any strategy they want, excluding some known-bad strategies that lead to catastrophe. Shareholders and CEOs are then free to pursue profit, without as much concern that in doing so they will take the entire U.S. economy down with them.

If a bank is free from government bailout or any help, why is it any business of government to dictate how much they are compensated?
 
Back
Top Bottom