• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Enriches Companies Defying Its Policy on Iran

Sir Loin

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
3,249
Reaction score
1,055
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
U.S. Enriches Companies Defying Its Policy on Iran - NYTimes.com
Excerpt:

The federal government has awarded more than $107 billion in contract payments, grants and other benefits over the past decade to foreign and multinational American companies while they were doing business in Iran, despite Washington’s efforts to discourage investment there, records show.

That includes nearly $15 billion paid to companies that defied American sanctions law by making large investments that helped Iran develop its vast oil and gas reserves


For years, the United States has been pressing other nations to join its efforts to squeeze the Iranian economy, in hopes of reining in Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Now, with the nuclear standoff hardening and Iran rebuffing American diplomatic outreach, the Obama administration is trying to win a tough new round of United Nations sanctions

But a New York Times analysis of federal records, company reports and other documents shows that both the Obama and Bush administrations have sent mixed messages to the corporate world when it comes to doing business in Iran, rewarding companies whose commercial interests conflict with American security goals.
Many of those companies are enmeshed in the most vital elements of Iran’s economy. More than two-thirds of the government money went to companies doing business in Iran’s energy industry — a huge source of revenue for the Iranian government and a stronghold of the increasingly powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, a primary focus of the Obama administration’s proposed sanctions because it oversees Iran’s nuclear and missile programs.
Other companies are involved in auto manufacturing and distribution, another important sector of the Iranian economy with links to the Revolutionary Guards. One supplied container ship motors to IRISL, a government-owned shipping line that was subsequently blacklisted by the United States for concealing military cargo.

Beyond $102 billion in United States government contract payments since 2000 — to do everything from building military housing to providing platinum to the United States Mint — the companies and their subsidiaries have reaped a variety of benefits. They include nearly $4.5 billion in loans and loan guarantees from the Export-Import Bank, a federal agency that underwrites the export of American goods and services, and more than $500 million in grants for work that includes cancer research and the turning of agricultural byproducts into fuel

In addition, oil and gas companies that have done business in Iran have over the years won lucrative drilling leases for close to 14 million acres of offshore and onshore federal land

In recent months, a number of companies have decided to pull out of Iran, because of a combination of pressure by the United States and other Western governments, “terrorism free” divestment campaigns by shareholders and the difficulty of doing business with Iran’s government. And several oil and gas companies are holding off on new investment, waiting to see what shape new sanctions may assume

The Obama administration points to that record, saying that it has successfully pressed allied governments and even reached out directly to corporate officials to dissuade investment in Iran, particularly in the energy industry. In addition, an American effort over many years to persuade banks to leave the country has isolated Iran from much of the international financial system, making it more difficult to do deals there.
And the kazoo band played on...............
 
This is a reminder that when we use trade embargos as an instrument of foreign policy, it does indeed harm our target but only if it harms us as well. The consequences need not be equally born, one side or the other may feel the impact more, but both sides will be affected.
 
I don't think the $107B number is the relevant one here - I'd much rather see the amount of money that was being invested in Iran. If one company made a $20m investment in some project in Iran back in 97, but subsequently received $20b in federal contracts for unrelated projects, then that would present a fairly misleading picture.

FWIW, here's a list of the violators according to the lawmakers who sent the letter to Obama:

According to the Congressional Research Service, the following companies are likely in violation of the Iran Sanctions Act:

Totalfina Elf (France)
ENI (Italy)
Bow Valley (Canada)
Royal Dutch Shell (Netherlands)
Norsk Hydro (Norway)
Lukoil (Russia)
GVA Consultants (Sweden)
Sheer Energy (Canada)
LG (South Korea)
Statoil (Norway)
Inpex (Japan)
China National Offshore Oil Company (China)
Sinopec (China)
Daelim (South Korea)
SKS Ventures (Malaysia)
Petrobras (Brazil)

In addition, the following firms have pending deals or preliminary agreements that would violate the Iran Sanctions Act:

IRASCO (Italy)
LNG Ltd. (Australia)
China National Offshore Oil Company (China)
Royal Dutch Shell (Netherlands)
Repsol (Spain)
Turkish Petroleum Company (Turkey)
OMV (Austria)
Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (Venezuela)
Sinopec (China)

50 U.S. Lawmakers Urge President Obama to Enforce Current Sanctions against Iran as Vienna Talks Stall | Congressman Mark Kirk ? 10th District, Illinois
 
I don't think the $107B number is the relevant one here - I'd much rather see the amount of money that was being invested in Iran. If one company made a $20m investment in some project in Iran back in 97, but subsequently received $20b in federal contracts for unrelated projects, then that would present a fairly misleading picture.

FWIW, here's a list of the violators according to the lawmakers who sent the letter to Obama:

50 U.S. Lawmakers Urge President Obama to Enforce Current Sanctions against Iran as Vienna Talks Stall | Congressman Mark Kirk ? 10th District, Illinois

Most of those companies seem to be involved in the oil business. Good luck attacking big oil.
 
Back
Top Bottom